Cover not available
Article published In:
Cognitive Approaches to Mind, Language, and Society: Theory and description
Edited by Mario Serrano-Losada and Daniela Pettersson-Traba
[Cognitive Linguistic Studies 11:1] 2024
► pp. 130–157

What frequencies tell us of the foodstuffs used as source domain to conceptualize attractive people in Peninsular Spanish

ORCID logo | Universidad Complutense de Madrid
This paper offers a study of the foodstuffs used by speakers of Peninsular Spanish when referring to an attractive individual. Two online forums were scanned to automatically search for linguistic realizations of the metaphor an attractive individual is appetizing food. A corpus of 860 short texts was compiled, which contains the food terms used in context. The frequency distribution of the type of food and the variable of gender was measured. Results indicate a preference to exploit the metaphor through salty food products and that the foodstuffs used are highly dependent on the variable of gender. Contrary to previous studies (e.g., Caitlin Hines 2000; Irene López Rodríguez 2007, 2008), the frequency of sweets and desserts is not higher with female referents. The findings do not agree with prior assumptions about the foodstuffs used in Peninsular Spanish to conceptualize attractive people and the cultural stereotypes associated with them.
Keywords: food, metaphor, gender, cultural stereotypes, Peninsular Spanish
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2. appetizing food to conceptualize attractive individuals
    • 2.1Food: An ideal source domain for metaphorical conceptualization
    • 2.2The relation between appetizing food and attractive individuals is experientially grounded
    • 2.3Cultural and contextual constraints for the conceptualization of attractive individuals as appetizing food
  • 3.Gender-stereotyped food and beliefs encoded in food metaphors
  • 4.Methodology and data
    • 4.1Methodological approach and procedure
    • 4.2Data
  • 5.Results and discussion
    • 5.1Frequency distribution
    • 5.2Cross-tabulation results
    • 5.3Discussion
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 6 June 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00115.gar
References (62)
References
Adams, C. J. (1991). The sexual politics of meat: A feminist-vegetarian critical theory. New York: ContinuumGoogle Scholar
Ahrens, W. (2015). Sensory taste preferences and taste sensitivity and the association of unhealthy food patterns with overweight and obesity in primary school children in Europe – a synthesis of data from the IDEFICS study. Flavour, 4 1, Article 8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Androutsopoulos, J. (2008). Potentials and limitations of discourse-centred online ethnography. Language@internet, 5 1, Article 9. [URL]Google Scholar
(2014). Computer-mediated communication and linguistic landscapes. In J. Holmes & K. Hazen (Eds.), Research methods in sociolinguistics: A practical guide (pp. 74–90). Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Baider, F. H., & Gesuato, S. (2003). Masculinist metaphors, feminist research. Metaphorik.de, 5 1, 6–25.Google Scholar
Baroni, M., & Bernardini, S. (2004). BootCaT: Bootstrapping corpora and terms from the web. Paper in Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’04) . Lisbon, Portugal, May 2004.
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22 (4), 577–660. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bartels, A., & Zeki, S. (2000). The neural basis of romantic love. NeuroReport: For Rapid Communication of Neuroscience Research, 11 (17), 3829–3834. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004). The neural correlates of maternal and romantic love. NeuroImage, 21 (3), 1155–1166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berridge, K. C. (2003). Pleasures of the brain. Brain and Cognition, 52 (1), 106–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boutaud, J.-J., Becuţ, A., & Marinescu, A. (2016). Food and culture. Cultural patterns and practices related to food in everyday life. Introduction. International Review of Social Research, 6 (1), 1–3. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brulotte, R. L., & Di Giovine, M. A. (2014). Edible identities: Food as cultural heritage. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cameron, L. (2010). Identifying metaphors in discourse data. In L. Cameron, & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities (pp. 97–115). Oakville: Equinox.Google Scholar
Cameron, L., & Deignan, A. (2006). The emergence of metaphor in discourse. Applied Linguistics, 27 (4), 671–690. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cavazza, N., Guidetti, M., & Butera, F. (2015). Ingredients of gender-based stereotypes about food. Indirect influence of food type, portion size and presentation on gendered intentions to eat. Appetite, 91 1, 266–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Civitello, L. (2008). Cuisine and culture: A history of food and people. Hoboken: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Dragoescu, A.-A. (2011). Implications of quality in food metaphors. Paper presented at The 5th International Quality Conference. Center for Quality, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Kragujevac.
Fisher, H., Aron, A., & Brown, L. L. (2005). Romantic love: An fMRI study of neural mechanism for mate choice. The Journal of Comparative Neurology, 493 (1), 58–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fisher, H., Xu, X., Aron, A., & Brown, L. (2016). Intense, passionate, romantic love: A natural addiction? How the fields that investigate romance and substance abuse can inform each other. Frontiers in Psychology, 7 1, Article 687. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Jr. R. W. (2017). Metaphor wars: Conceptual metaphors in human life. New York: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Grady, J. (1999). A typology of motivation for conceptual metaphor: Correlation vs. resemblance. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. & G. J. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. 79–100). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Group, P. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22 (1), 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez-Rivas, C. (2011). Women as food in Hispanic cultural metaphors. An Online Feminist Journal, 3(3), 6–20.Google Scholar
Hines, C. (2000). Rebaking the pie: The woman as dessert metaphor. In M. Bucholtz, A. C. Liang & L. A. Sutton (Eds.), Reinventing identities: The gendered self in discourse (pp. 145–162). Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Khajeh, Z., & Abdullah, I. (2012). Persian culinary metaphors: A cross-cultural conceptualization. GEMA Online: Journal of Language Studies, 12 (1), 69–87.Google Scholar
Kleparski, G. A. (2008). The joys and sorrows of metaphorical consumption: Mozarellas, prostisciuttos, muttons and yum-yum girls – foodsemy with a romance accent. Studia Anglica Resoviensia, 51 (5), 45–59.Google Scholar
Kleparski, G. (2016). On the metaphorics of sweets and meats. Styles of Communication, 8 (2), 7–20.Google Scholar
Kleparski, G. A., & Górecka-Smolińska, M. (2019). Bifurcating the mechanism of foodsemy: Randy skeletal meats, sinister variety meats, gay fruit, sick veggies and bad apples. Styles of Communication, 11 (1), 29–48.Google Scholar
Koller, V. (2004). Businesswomen and war metaphors: ‘Possessive, jealous and pugnacious’?. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 8 (1), 3–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2015). Where metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2020). Extended conceptual metaphor theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Kowalczyk, A. Z. (2016). The semantic history of dough, bread, bun: On how money and women go together. Studia Anglica Resoviensia, 13 (93), 34–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). Semantic transfers in the domain of foodstuffs . Linguistics beyond and within, 5 (1), 90–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago press.Google Scholar
Landau, M. J., Robinson, M. D., & Meier, B. P. (2014). The power of metaphor: Examining its influence on social life (Vol. 1551). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Littlemore, J. (2019). Metaphors in the mind: Sources of variation in embodied metaphor. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Monterrosa, E. C., Frongillo, E. A., Drewnowski, A., de Pee, S., & Vandevijvere, S. (2020). Sociocultural influences on food choices and implications for sustainable healthy diets. Food and Nutrition Bulletin, 41 (2_suppl), 59S–73S. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mori, D., Chaiken, S., & Pliner, P. (1987). “Eating lightly” and the self-presentation of femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53 (4), 693–702. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musolff, A. (2016). Cross-cultural variation in deliberate metaphor interpretation. Metaphor and the Social World, 6 (2), 205–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Níkleva, D. G. (2016). Tendencias actuales en los piropos españoles [Current trends in Spanish compliments]. Onomázein, (34), 322–355.Google Scholar
Onchoke, A. S., & Wen, X. (2017). A cognitive analysis of woman metaphors in Ekegusii language. Linguistics and Literature Studies, 5 (5), 344–353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Partearroyo, T., Samaniego-Vaesken, M. D. L., Ruiz, E., Aranceta-Bartrina, J., Gil, Á., González-Gross, M., Ortega, R. M., Serra-Majem, L., & Varela-Moreiras, G. (2019). Current food consumption amongst the Spanish ANIBES study population. Nutrients, 11 (11), Article 2663. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez, J. C. (2005). El piropo en la España de 2000 y las nuevas formas de cortesía [The compliment in Spain in 2000 and the new forms of courtesy]. Revistainternacional de lingüísticaiberoamericana, 3 (1), 31–48. [URL]
Ramírez, E. C. O. (2008). El arte de piropear: ¿halago u ofensa? [The art of complimenting: Flattery or offense?]. Tinkuy: Boletín de investigación y debate, 10 1, 51–59.Google Scholar
Robinson, M. J. F., Fischer, A. M., Ahuja, A., Lesser, E. N., & Maniates, H. (2015). Roles of “wanting” and “liking” in motivating behavior: Gambling, food, and drug addictions. In E. H. Simpson & P. D. Balsam (Eds.), Behavioral neuroscience of motivation (pp. 105–136). Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, I. L. (2007). The representation of women in teenage and women’s magazines: Recurring metaphors in English. Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad Complutense, 15 1, 15–42.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, I. (2008). Are women really sweet? An analysis of the woman as dessert metaphor in the English and Spanish written press. Babel–AFIAL: Aspectos de Filoloxía Inglesa e Alemá, (32), 179–195.Google Scholar
Rozin, P. (2005). The meaning of food in our lives: A cross-cultural perspective on eating and well-being. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behaviour, 37 (S2), S107–S112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Food preferences, psychology and physiology of. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (pp. 296–299). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Rozin, P., Hormes, J. M., Faith, M. S., & Wansink, B. (2012). Is meat male? A quantitative multimethod framework to establish metaphoric relationships. Journal of Consumer Research, 39 (3), 629–643. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. (2020). Understanding figures of speech: Dependency relations and organizational patterns. Language & Communication, 71 1, 16–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sobal, J. (2005). Men, meat, and marriage: Models of masculinity. Food and Foodways, 13 (1–2), 135–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soriano, C. (2012). Metáfora conceptual. In I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano & J. Valenzuela (Eds.), Lingüística cognitive (pp. 97–121). Barcelona: Anthropos.Google Scholar
Steen, G. (2014). The cognitive-linguistic revolution in metaphor studies. In J. Littlemore & J. R. Taylor (Eds.), The Bloomsbury companion to cognitive linguistics (pp. 117–142). London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Thibodeau, P. H., & Boroditsky, L. (2011). Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PloS one, 6 (2), Article e16782. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trachootham, D., Satoh-Kuriwada, S., Lam-ubol, A., Promkam, C., Chotechuang, N., Sasano, T., & Shoji, N. (2018). Differences in taste perception and spicy preference: A Thai-Japanese cross-cultural study. Chemical Senses, 43 (1), 65–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Varela, F., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Veale, T. (2012). Exploding the creativity myth: The computational foundations of linguistic creativity. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Venclovská, N. (2006). Los piropos españoles [The Spanish compliments]. Brno: Mazaryk University.Google Scholar
Wang, G.-J., Volkow, N. D., Telang, F., Jayne, M., Ma, J., Rao, M., Zhu, W., Wong, C. T., Pappas, N. R., Geliebter, A., & Fowler, J. S. (2004). Exposure to appetitive food stimuli markedly activates the human brain. NeuroImage, 21 (4), 1790–1797. DOI logoGoogle Scholar