Abdelhadi, S., Ibrahim, R., & Eviatar, Z. (2011). Perceptual load in the reading of Arabic: Effects of orthographic visual complexity on detection. Writing Systems Research, 31, 117–127. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Abd El-Minem, F.M. (1987). Elm al-sarf. Jerusalem: Al-Taufik Press [in Arabic].![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Abu-Rabia, S. (2001). The role of vowels in reading semitic scripts: Data from Arabic and Hebrew. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 141, 39–59. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Adams, M.J. (1979). Models of word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 111, 133–176. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Adams, M.J., & Bruck, M. (1993). Word recognition: The interface of educational policies and scientific research. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 51, 113–139. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aghababian, V., & Nazir, T.A. (2000). Developing normal reading skills: Aspects of the visual processes underlying word recognition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 761, 123–150. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Allen, P.A., Wallace, B., & Weber, T.A. (1995). Influence of case type, word frequency, and exposure duration on visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 211, 914–934. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Attneave, F. (1955). Symmetry, information, and memory for patterns. American Journal of Psychology, 681, 209–222. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Azzam, R. (1989). Orthography and reading of the Arabic language. In P.G. Aaron & R.M. Joshi (Eds.), Reading and writing disorders in different orthographic systems (pp. 1–29). New York: Kluwer Academic. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Azzam, R. (1993). The nature of Arabic reading and spelling errors of young children. Reading and Writing, 51, 355–385. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Babcock, M.K., & Freyd, J.J. (1988). Perception of dynamic information in static handwritten forms. American Journal of Psychology, 1011, 111–130. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Babkoff, H., Faust, M., & Lavidor, M. (1997). Lexical decision, visual hemifield and angle of orientation. Neuropsychologia, 351, 487–495. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Badian, N. (2005). Does a visual-orthographic deficit contribute to reading disability? Annals of Dyslexia, 551, 28–52. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Balota, D.A. (1994). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning. In M.A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 303–358).San Diego, CA: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Belaid, A., & Choisy, C. (2008). Human Reading based strategies for off-line arabic word recognition. Arabic and Chinese Handwriting Recognition Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 47681, 36–56. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berent, I., & Shimron, J. (1997). The representation of Hebrew words: Evidence from the obligatory contour principle. Cognition, 641, 39–72. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berwick D.M., & Winickoff, D.E. (1996). The truth about doctors’ handwriting: A prospective study. BMJ, 3131, 1657–1658. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Besner, D. (1989). On the role of outline shape and word-specific visual pattern in the identification of function words: None. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A1, 91–105. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blommaert, F.J. (1988). Early-visual factors in letter confusions. Spatial Vision, 31, 199–224. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bouma, H. (1970). Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition. Nature, 2261, 177–178. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bouma, H. (1971). Visual recognition of isolated lower-case letters. Vision Research, 111, 450–474. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bouma, H. (1973). Visual interference in the parafoveal recognition of initial and final letters of words. Vision Research, 13(4), 767–782. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bouma, H. (1978). Visual search and reading: Eye movements and functional visual field: A tutorial review. In J. Requin (Ed.), Attention and performance, (Vol. VII1, pp. 115–146). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bouma, H., & Legein, C. (1977). Foveal and parafoveal recognition of letters and words by dyslexics and by average readers. Neuropsychologia, 151, 69–79. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bradshaw, J.L., Nettleton, N.C., & Taylor, M.J. (1981). The use of laterally presented words in research into cerebral asymmetry: Is directional scanning likely to be a source of artifact? Brain and Language, 141, 1–14. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Briggs, R., & Hocevar, D.J. (1975). A new distinctive feature theory for upper case letters. Journal of General Psychology, 931, 87–93.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bruder, G.A. (1978). Role of visual familiarity in the word-superiority effects obtained with the simultaneous matching task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41, 88–100. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bryden, M.P., & Allard, F. (1976). Visual hemifield asymmetries depend on typeface. Brain & Language, 31, 191–200. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cattell, J.M. (1896). The time taken up by cerebral operations. Mind, 111, 377–392.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, J.J., & O’Regan, J.K. (1999). Word ambiguity and the optimal viewing position in reading. Vision Research, 391, 843–857. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chung, S.T.L. (2002). The Effect of letter spacing on reading speed in central and peripheral vision. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,43(4), 1270–1276.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chung, S.T.L., & Legge, G.E. (2009). Precision of position signals for letters. Vision Research, 491, 1948–1960. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coltheart, M. (2005). Modeling Reading: The dual- route approach. In M. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 6–23). Oxford, England: Blackwell. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coltheart, M., & Freeman, R. (1974). Case alternation impairs word identification. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31, 102–104. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108(1), 204–256. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Corcoran, D.W.J., & Rouse, R.O. (1970). An aspect of perceptual organization involved in reading typed and handwritten words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 221, 526–530. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Davis, C.J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 1171, 713–758. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., Sigman, M., & Vinckier, F. (2005). The neural code for written words: A proposal. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(7), 335–341. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Drewnowski, A., & Healy, A.F. (1977). Detection errors on the and and: Evidence for reading units larger than the word. Memory & Cognition, 51, 636–647. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ehri, L. (2005). Development of sight word reading: Phases and findings. In M. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: a handbook (pp. 135–154). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ehri, C.L., & Snowling, J.M. (2005). Developmental variations in word recognition. In C.A. Stone, R.E. Silliman, J.B. Ehren, & K. Apel (Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy: Development and disorders (pp. 433–460). New York, NY: Guilford Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eviatar, Z., Ibrahim, R., & Ganayim, D. (2004). Orthography and the hemispheres: Visual and linguistic aspects of letter processing. Neuropsychology, 181, 174–184. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eviatar, Z., & Zaidel, E. (1991). The effects of word length and emotionality on hemispheric contribution to lexical decision. Neuropsychologia, 291, 415–428. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Farah, N., Khadir, M.T., & Sellami, M. (2005). Artificial neural network fusion: Application to Arabic words recognition.
13th European Symposium on
Artificial Neural Networks ESANN
, (pp. 151–155).
Fehrer, E.V. (1935). An investigation of the learning of visually perceived forms. American Journal of Psychology, 471, 187–221. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fisher, D.F. (1975). Reading and visual search. Memory and Cognition, 31, 188–196. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K.E. Patterson, J.C. Marashall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia (pp. 301–330). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gervais, M.J., Harvey, L.O., Jr., & Roberts, J.O. (1984). Identification confusions among letters of the alphabet. Journal of Experimental Psychology— Human Perception and Performance, 101, 655–666. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geyer, L.H. (1977). Recognition and confusion of the lowercase alphabet. Perception & Psychophysics, 221, 487–490. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gibson, E.J., Osser, H., Schiff, W., & Smith, J. (1963). An analysis of critical features of letters tested by a confusion matrix. In A basic research program on reading. [Cooperative Research Project No. 639], Ithaca, NY: Cornell University![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gomez, P., Ratcliff, R., & Perea, M. (2008). The overlap model: A model of letter position coding. Psychological Review, 1151, 577– 600. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gough, P.B. (1984).Wordrecognition. In P.D. Pearson, R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 225–253). New York: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hagenzieker, M.P., van der Heijden, A.H.C., & Hagenaar, R. (1990). Time-courses in visual-information processing: Some empirical evidence for inhibition. Psychological Research, 521, 13–21. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Healy, A.F. (1976). Detection errors on the word the: Evidence for reading units larger than letters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 235–242. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Healy, A.F. (1994). Letter detection:A windowto unitization and other cognitive processes in reading text. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 333–344. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Healy, A.F., Conboy, G.L., & Drewnowski, A. (1987). Characterizingthe processing units of reading: Effects of intra- and intern word spaces in a letter detection task. In B.K. Britton & S.M. Glynn) Eds.), Executive control processes in reading (pp. 279–296). Hillsdale,NJ: Erlbaum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hellige, J., & Adamson, M. (2007). Hemispheric Differences in processing handwritten cursive. Brain & Language, 1021, 215–227. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Henderson, J.M. (1992). Visual attention and eye movement control during reading and scene perception. In K. Rayner (Ed.), Eye movements and visual cognition: Scene perception and reading (pp. 260–283). New York: Springer-Verlag. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Iacoboni, M., & Zaidel, E. (1996). Hemispheric independence in word recognition: Evidence from unilateral and bilateral presentations. Brain and Language, 531, 121–140. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ibrahim, R., & Eviatar, Z. (2003). The effects of metalinguistic awareness on acquisition of reading: A cross-language comparison. Manuscript submitted for publication.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ibrahim, R., Eviatar, Z., & Aharon-Perez, J. (2002). Do the characteristics of Arabic orthography slow its cognitive processing? Neuropsychology, 161, 322–326. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jacobs, R.J. (1979). Visual resolution and contour interaction in the fovea and periphery. Vision research, 191, 1187–1196. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jordan, T.R., Patching, G.R., & Milner, A.D. (2000). Lateralized word recognition: Assessing the role of hemispheric specialization, modes of lexical access and perceptual asymmetry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 261, 1192–1208. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Khateb, A., Khateb-Abdelgani, M., Taha, H.Y., & Ibrahim, R. (2014). The impact of orthographic connectivity on visual word recognition in Arabic: A cross- sectional study. Reading and Writing, 61, 1–24.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Khateb, A., Taha, H.Y., Elias, I., & Ibrahim, R. (2013). The effect of the internal orthographic connectivity of written Arabic words on the process of the visual recognition: A comparison between skilled and dyslexic readers. Writing Systems Research, 51, 214–233. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koriat, A., & Norman, J. (1985). Reading rotated words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 490–508. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koriat, A., & Norman, J. (1989). Why is word recognition impaired by disorientation while the identification of single letters is not? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 151, 153–163. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kristen, P., Hensen, P., Holliday, I., & Cornelossen, P. (2006). Attentional Shifting and the role of the dorsal pathways in visual word recognition. Neuropsychologia, 441, 2926–2936. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
LaBerge, D., & Brown, V. (1989). Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. Psychological Review, 961, 101–124. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
LaBerge, D, & Samuels, S.J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information Processing in Reading. Cognitive Psychology, 61, 293–323. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lachmann, T. (2000). Memory processes in recognition and comparison. Psychologia Universalis Nr. 22. Lengerich, Berlin: Pabst Science Publishers.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Latham, K., & Whitaker, D. (1996). A comparison of word recognition and reading performance in foveal and peripheral vision. Vision Research, 361, 2665–2674. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lavidor, M. (2011). Whole-word shape effect in dyslexia. Journal of Research in Reading, 34(4), 443–454. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levi, D.M., Song, S., & Pelli, D.G. (2007). Amblyopic reading is crowded. Journal of Vision, 7(2), 211, 1–17.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leybaert, J., & Content, A. (1995). Reading and spelling acquisition in two different teaching methods: A test of the independence hypothesis. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 71, 65–88. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lindell, A.K., & Nicholls, M.E.R. (2003). Cortical representation of the fovea: Implications for visual half-field research. Cortex, 39(1), 111–117. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lindell, A.K., Nicholls, M.E.R., Kwantes, P.J.K., & Castles, A. (2005). Sequential processing in hemispheric word recognition: The impact of initial letter discriminability on the OUP naming effect. Brain & Language, 931, 160–172. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Loomis, J.M. (1982). Analysis of tactile and visual confusion matrices. Perception & Psychophysics, 311, 41–52. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lorusso, M.L., Facoetti S., Pesenti, S., Cattaneo, C., Molteni, M., & Geiger, G. (2004). Wider recognition in peripheral vision common to different subtypes of dyslexia. Vision research, 441, 2413–2424. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mari-Beffa, P., Houghton, G., Estevez, A.F., & Fuentes, L.J. (2000). Word-based grouping affects the prime-task effect on semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 261, 469–447 ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martelli, M., Majaj, J.N., & Pelli, G.D. (2005). Are faces processed like words? A diagnostic test for recognition by parts. Journal of Vision, 51, 58–70. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marzouki, Y., Meeter, M., & Grainger, J. (2013).Location invariance in masked repetition priming of letters and words. Acta Psychologica. (Amst.), 1421, 23–29. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mason, M. (1978). From print to sound in mature readers as a function of reader ability and two forms of orthographic regularity. Memory and Cognition, 61, 568–581. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mazzro, D.W., & Klitzke, D. (1977). Letters are functional in word identification. Memory & Cognition,5(3), 292–298. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mayall, K.A., Humphreys, G.W., & Olson, A. (1997). Disruption to word or letter processing? The origins of case-mixing effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 231, 1275–1286. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McClelland, J.L. (1976). Preliminary letter identification in the perception of words and nonwords. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1976(7), 80–91. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McClelland, J.L., & Rumelhart, D.E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effect in letter perception. Part I: an account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 881, 375–407. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McLeish, E. (2007). A study of the effect of letter spacing on the reading speed of young readers with low vision. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 251, 133–143. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Montant, M., Nazir, T.A., & Poncet, M. (1998). Pure alexia and the viewing position effect in printed words. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 151, 93–140. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Na¨sa¨nen, R., Kukkonen, H., & Rovamo, J. (1993). Spatial integration of band-pass filtered patterns in noise. Vision Research, 331, 903–911. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Navon, D. (1978). Perception of mis-oriented words and letter strings. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 321, 129–140. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nazir, T.A. (2000). Traces of print along the visual pathway. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 3–23). Amsterdam, North- Holland: Elsevier. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nazir, T.A., Heller, D., & Sussmann, C. (1992). Letter visibility and word recognition: The optimal viewing position in printed words. Perception & Psychophysics, 52(3), 315–328. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nazir, T A., O'Regan, J.K., & Jaccobs, A.M. (1991). On words and their letters. Bulletin ofthe Psychonomic Society, 291, 171–174. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
New, B., Ferrand, L., Pallier, C., & Brysbaert, M. (2006). Re-examining word length effects in visual word recognition: New evidence from the English Lexicon Project. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 131, 45–52. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pammer, K., Lavis, R., Cooper, C., Hansen, P.C., & Cornelissen, P.L. (2005). Symbol- string sensitivity and adult performance in lexical decision. Brain and Language, 94(3), 278–296. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pammer, K., Lavis, R., Hansen, P., & Cornelissen, P.L. (2004) Symbol string sensitivity and children's reading. Brain and Language, 891, 601–610. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pelli, D.G., Burns, C.W., Farell, B., & Moore-Page, D.C. (2006) Feature detection and letter identification. Vision Research, 46(28), 4646–4674. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pelli, D.G., & Farrell, B. (1992). Visual Memory. Talk presented at
ECVP meeting
, Pisa, Italy.
Pelli, D.G., Farell, B., & Moore, D.C. (2003) The remarkable inefficiency of word recognition. Nature, 4231, 752–756. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pelli, D.G., Palomares, M., & Majaj, N.J. (2004). Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: Distinguishing feature integration from detection. Journal of Vision, 41, 1136–1169. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pelli, D.G., Tillman, A.K., Freeman, J., Su, M., Berger, D.T., & Majaj, J.N. (2007). Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate. Journal of Vision, 7(2), 1–36. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pelli, D.G., Farell, B., & Moore, D.C. (2003). The remarkable inefficiency of word recognition. Nature, 4231, 752–756. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Perea, M., & Gomez, P. (2012a). Subtle Increases in inter letter spacing facilitate the encoding of words during normal reading. PLoS ONE, 7(10), e47568. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Perea, M., & Gomez, P. (2012b). Increasing inter letter spacing facilitates encoding of words. Psychology of Bulletin & Review, 191, 332–338. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Perea, M., & Lupker, S.J. (2003). Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming. Memory & Cognition, 311, 829–841. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Perea, M., & Lupker, S.J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 511, 231–246. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Perea, M., Moret-Tatay, C., & Gomez, P. (2011). The effects of inter letter spacing in visual-word recognition. Acta Psychologica, 1371, 345–351. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Perea, M., Panadero, V., Moret-Tatay, C., & Gomez, P. (2012). The effects of inter letterspacing in visual-word recognition: Evidence with young normal readers and developmental dyslexics. Learn and Instruction, 221, 420–430. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Perry, C., Ziegler, J.C., & Zorzi, M. (2007). Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychological Review, 1141, 273–315. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rayner, K., Foorman, B., Perfetti, C.A., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M.S. (2002). How should reading be taught? Scientific American, 2861, 84–91. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reichle, E.D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2006). E–Z Reader: A cognitive-control, serial-attention model of eye-movement control during reading. Cognitive Systems Research, 71, 4–22. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rumelhart, D.E., & McClelland, J.L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review, 89(1), 60–94. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schneider, V.I., & Healy, A.F. (1993). Detecting phonemes and letters in text: Interactions between different types and levels of processes. Memory & Cognition, 211, 739–751. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schomaker, L., & Segers, E. (1999). Finding features used in the human reading of cursive handwriting. International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition, 21, 13–18. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Share, D.L. (2008). On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an "outlier" orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 1341, 584–615. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shillcock, R., Ellison, T.M., & Monaghan, P. (2000). Eye-fixation behavior, lexical storage, and visual word recognition in a split processing model. Psychological Review, 107(4), 824–851. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sieroff, E., & Posner, M.I. (1988). Cueing spatial attention during processing of words and letter strings in normals. Cognitive. Neuropsycholgy, 51, 451–72. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Smith, F. (1969). Familiarity of configuration vs discriminability of features in the visual identification of words. Psychonomic Science, 141, 261–263. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Strasburger, H. (2003). A generalized cortical magnification rule predicts low-contrast letter recognition in the visual field. Journal of Vision, 3(9), 653a. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Strasburger, H. (2003). Indirektes Sehen. Formerkennung im zentralen und peripheren Gesichtsfeld. GPttingen, Bern, Toronto, Seattle: Hogrefe.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stuart, J.A., & Burian, H.M. (1962). A study of separation difficulty and its relationship to visual acuity in normal and amblyopic eyes. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 531, 471–477. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stuart, M., Masterson, J., Dixon, M., & Quinlan, P. (1999). Inferring sublexical correspondences from sight vocabulary: Evidence from 6- and 7-year-olds. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 52(2), 353–366. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Taha, H., Ibrahim, R., & Khateb, A. (2013). How does Arabic orthographic connectivity modulate brain activity during visual word recognition: An ERP study. Brain Topography, 261, 292–302. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tai, Y.C., Sheedy, J., & Hayes, J. (2009). The effect of interletter spacing on reading. Paper presented at the
Computer Displays and Vision Conference
. Forest Grove, OR.
Tanaka, J.W., & Gauthier, I. (1997). Expertise in object and face recognition. In R.L. Goldstone, D.L. Medin, P.G. Schyns& (Eds.), Mechanisms of perceptual learning (Vol. 361, pp. 83–125). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Taouk, M., & Coltheart, M. (2004).The cognitive processes involved in learning to read in Arabic. Reading and Writing, 17(1-2), 27–57. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Taylor, I., & Taylor, M.M. (1983). The psychology of reading. New York: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tinker, M.A. (1963). Legibility of print. Iowa: Iowa State University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Townsend, J.T. (1971a). Theoretical analysis of the alphabetic confusion matrix. Perception & Psychophysics, 91, 40–50. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Townsend, J.T. (1971b). Alphabetic confusion: A test of models for individuals. Perception & Psychophysics, 91, 449–454. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Townsend, J.T., & Ashby, F.G. (1982). Experimental test of contemporary mathematical models of visual letter recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 81, 834–854. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Townsend, J.T., Hu, G.G., & Evans, R.J. (1984). Modeling feature perception in brief displays with evidence for positive interdependencies. Perception & Psychophysics, 361, 35–49. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Overschelde, J.P., & Healy, A.F. (2005). A blank look in reading: The effect of blank space on the identification of letters and words during reading. Experimental Psychology, 521, 213–223. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vellutino, F.R., Fletcher, J.M., Snowling, M.J., & Scanlon, D.M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(1), 2–40. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wagner, N.M., & Harris, L.J. (1994). Effects of typeface characteristics on visual field asymmetries for letter identification in children and adults. Brain & Language, 461, 41–58. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Watson, A.B., & Fitzhugh, A.E. (1989). Modelling character legibility. Society for Information Display Digest of Technical Papers, 201, 360–363.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weinstein, M. (1955). Stimulus complexity and the recognition of visual patterns. Doctoral dissertation. Ohio State University
Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(2), 221–243. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Windes, J.D., (1991). Reaction time to a word in different orientations with letters rotated separately in different orientations. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 721, 299–305. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ziegler, J.C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilledreading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychol Bulletin, 1311, 3–29. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zorzi, M., Barbiero, C., Facoetti, A., Lonciari, L., Carrozzi, M., Montico, M., Bravar, L., George, F., Pech-Georgel, C., & Ziegler, J.C. (2012). Extra-large letter spacing improves reading in dyslexia.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
, 109(28), 11455–11459.