Effectiveness of a CL-informed approach to English preposition acquisition by young Chinese learners
While increasing efforts have been made to teach English prepositions to EFL learners from a Cognitive Linguistics (CL) perspective, the bulk of the extant research has focused on adult learners at the advanced English proficiency level and reported only quantitative results. Limited attention has been paid to elementary learners, and there has been little qualitative evidence of the pedagogical effectiveness of CL-informed approaches. This study aims to address these issues with a quasi-experiment embedded in an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design. Twenty-two young Chinese learners received two types of instruction, respectively, to learn locative prepositions in, on, and at. A conceptual metaphor time as space that originates in CL was exploited as the intervention for the experimental group, whereas a data-driven approach was adopted for the control group. Quantitative data collected from the participants through a set of tests and qualitative data collected from the instructor with a semi-structured interview generally supported the effectiveness and, to a lesser extent, the efficiency of the CL-informed approach. The paper concludes with a discussion of the pedagogical implications derived from the empirical results.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review
- 2.1Challenge for EFL learners to acquire English prepositions
- 2.2CL-informed approaches to teaching English prepositions
- 3.Methods
- 3.1Pilot studies
- 3.2Participants in the main study
- 3.3Procedure
- 3.4Intervention
- 3.5Instruments
- 3.5.1The tests
- 3.5.2The semi-structured interview
- 3.6Data analysis
- 4.Results and discussion
- 4.1Statistical results
- 4.2Findings from the interview
- 4.2.1The instructor’s perceptions of the two instructional approaches
- 4.2.2The instructor’s perceptions of the students’ performance in the two approaches
- 4.2.3Pedagogical suggestions
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Note
-
References
References (30)
References
Akbari, R., & Allvar, N. K. (2010). L2 teacher characteristics as predictors of students’ academic achievement. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language,
13
(4), n4.
Ang, L., & Tan, K. H. (2016). Preposition-related collocation use among British and Malaysian learners: A corpus analysis. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities,
24
1, 145–156.
Barnett, S. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn?: A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin,
128
(4), 612–637.
Boulton, A. (2010). Data-driven learning: Taking the computer out of the equation. Language Learning,
60
(3), 534–572.
Boulton, A., & Cobb, T. (2017). Corpus use in language teaching: A meta-analysis. Language Learning,
67
(2), 348–393.
Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching. San Francisco State University: Person Education Limited.
Chen, X., & Xu, Y. (2009). 意象图式理论对多义介词 On, Over, Above 习得作用的实证研究 [An empirical study on the effectiveness of Theory of Image Schema on learning English prepositions on, over, and above]. 外语与外语教学 [Foreign Languages and Second Language Teaching],
9
1, 18–23.
Darus, S., & Ching, K. H. (2009). Common errors in written English essays of form one Chinese students: A case study. European Journal of Social Sciences,
10
(2), 242–253.
Falck, M. J. (2018). Embodied experience and the teaching and learning of L2 prepositions: A case study of abstract in and on. In A. Tyler, L. Huang, & H. Jan (Eds.), What is applied cognitive linguistics?: Answers from current SLA research (pp. 287–304). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Gu, P. Y., Hu, G., & Zhang, L. J. (2005). Investigating language learner strategies among lower primary school pupils in Singapore. Language and Education,
19
(4), 281–303.
Hemchua, S., & Schmitt, N. (2006). An analysis of lexical errors in the English compositions of Thai learners. Prospect,
21
(3), 3–25.
Hung, B. P. (2017). Vietnamese students learning the semantics of English prepositions. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies,
17
(4), 14–27.
Hung, B. P., Truong, V., & Nguyen, N. V. (2018). Students’ responses to CL-based teaching of English prepositions. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research,
73
1, 41–58.
Hung, B. P., Truong, V., & Vu, N. N. (2018). Applying cognitive linguistics to teaching English prepositions: A quasi-experimental study. International Journal of Instruction,
11
(3), 327–346.
Jafari, S. S. (2014). A cross-linguistic study of English and Persian prepositions. Journal of Language Teaching and Research,
5
(3), 689–697.
Koosha, M., & Jafarpour, A. A. (2006). Data-driven learning and teaching collocation of prepositions: The case of Iranian EFL adult learners. Asian EFL journal,
8
(4), 192–209.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago press.
Mahmoodzadeh, M. (2012). A cross-linguistic study of prepositions in Persian and English: The effect of transfer. Theory & Practice in Language Studies,
2
(4), 734–740.
Odlin, T. (2012). Crosslinguistic influence in second language acquisition. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 436–486). Oxford: Blackwell.
Schnotz, W. (2005). An integrated model of text and picture comprehension. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (Vol. 49–691, pp. 69). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stipek, D. J. (1998). Motivation to learn: From theory to practice (3rd ed.). Allyn & Bacon: Boston.
Sun, X., & Hu, G. (2020). Direct and indirect data-driven learning: An experimental study of hedging in an EFL writing class. Language Teaching Research,
00
(0), 1–29.
Tyler, A. (2012). Cognitive linguistics and second language learning. New York: Routledge.
Tyler, A., & Evans, V. (2003). The semantics of English prepositions: Spatial scenes, embodied meaning, and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tyler, A., Mueller, C., & Ho, V. (2011). Applying cognitive linguistics to learning the semantics of English to, for and at: An experimental investigation. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics,
8
1, 181–206.
Wardhaugh, R. (1970). The contrastive analysis hypothesis. TESOL quarterly,
4
1, 123–130.
Wijaya, D., & Ong, G. (2018). Applying cognitive linguistics to teaching English prepositions in the EFL classroom. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics,
8
(1), 1–10.
Yu, X. (2014). An analysis of prepositional error correction in TEM8 and its implications for FL learning. Theory & Practice in Language Studies,
4
(3), 624–630.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Wijaya, David & Jovita Gianina
2024.
Incorporating Embodied Learning Activities into the Instruction of will and be going to.
English Teaching & Learning 48:3
► pp. 417 ff.
Pu, Chunfang & Kapil Sharma
2022.
Design and Application of English Online Learning Platform.
Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing 2022
► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.