Ronald Fong | Department of English, University of Macau
This article defends the position taken by Talmy that Mandarin Chinese is satellite-framed, and thus argues against Slobin and Chen and Guo that Mandarin is ‘equipollently-framed’. The approach we take is constructional and cognitive in that we draw insights from Construction Grammar and Cognitive Grammar, though it is not restricted to either of them. A more unconventional view of the clause structure in Chinese is first presented, examining the so-called ‘complex sentences’ from a cognitive perspective. The consequence of this view is that the notion of ‘equipollent-framed language’ for Chinese can be abandoned and thus tidying up Talmy’s original typology. It is further argued that the constructional-cognitive view of Chinese captures the structural intuitions more appropriately than a traditional generative account, and that the motion-directional structure in Chinese has been constructionalized to the extent that individual verbs in the construction merge but produce a structure with more than their total properties.
(1995) Constructions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, A.E
(2006) Constructions at work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haiman, J
(1985) Natural syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huang, C-T.J., Li, A., & Li, Y
(2009) The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G.K.
(2002) The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Langacker, R.W
(1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar (Vol. I1). California: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, R.W
(1991) Foundations of cognitive grammar (Vol. II1). California: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, R.W
(2007) Ten lectures on cognitive grammar. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
Langacker, R.W
(2008).Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Langacker, R.W
(2013) Essentials of cognitive grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M
(2005) Argument Realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum. S., Leech, G., & Svarvik, J
(1985) A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
Rappaport Hovav, M., & Levin, B
(2001) An event structure account of English resultatives. Language, 771, 766–797.
Slobin, D
(2004) The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology & the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative (Vol. 21, pp. 219–257). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
Tang, S-W
(2010) Formal Chinese syntax. Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Publishing House.
Talmy, L
(2000) Towards a cognitive semantics (Vol. 21). Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Talmy, L
(2008) Main verb properties. Revised version. [URL].
Talmy, L
(2010) Ten lectures on cognitive semantics. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
(2013) Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cited by (1)
Cited by 1 other publications
Fong, Ronald
2017. Chinese Motion-Directional Construction: A Conceptual and Cognitive Analysis. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 38:2 ► pp. 119 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.