Introduction published in:
Metaphor Variation in Englishes around the World
Edited by Marcus Callies and Alexander Onysko
[Cognitive Linguistic Studies 4:1] 2017
► pp. 1–6
Introduction

Metaphor variation in Englishes around the world

Introduction to the special issue

| University of Bremen (Germany)
| University of Klagenfurt (Austria)
Published online: 16 October 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.4.1.01cal
References

References

Davies, M., & Fuchs, R.
(2015) Expanding horizons in the study of World Englishes with the 1.9 billion word Global Web-based English Corpus (GloWbE). English World-Wide, 36(1), 1–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, D.
(2016) The sociosemiotic commitment. Cognitive Linguistics, 27(4), 527–542. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, D., Kristiansen, G., & Peirsman, Y.
(Eds.) (2010) Advances in Cognitive Sociolinguistics. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
(2000) Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feelings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2005) Metaphor in culture. Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kristiansen, G., & Dirven, R.
(Eds.) (2008) Cognitive Sociolinguistics. Language variation, cultural models, social systems. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Polzenhagen, F., & Wolf, H. -G.
(2010) Investigating culture from a linguistic perspective: An exemplification with Hong Kong English. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 58(3), 281–303. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pütz, M., Robinson, J., & Reif, M.
(Eds.) (2014) Cognitive Sociolinguistics: Social and cultural variation in cognition and language use. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sharifian, F.
(2008) Cultural model of Home in Aboriginal children’s English. In G. Kristiansen & R. Dirven (Eds.), Cognitive Sociolinguistics (pp. 333–352). Berlin & New York: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Cultural Linguistics and world Englishes. World Englishes, 34(4), 515–532. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sharifian, F., Yu, N., Dirven, R., & Niemeier, S.
(Eds.) (2008) Culture, body, and language: Conceptualizations of internal body organs across cultures and languages. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, H. -G., & Chan, T.
(2016) Understanding Asia by means of cognitive sociolinguistics and cultural linguistics. The example of GHOSTS in Hong Kong English. In G. Leitner, A. Hashim, & H. -G. Wolf (Eds.), Communicating with Asia: The future of English as a global language (pp. 249–266). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, H. -G., & Polzenhagen, F.
(2007) Fixed expressions as manifestations of cultural conceptualizations: Examples from African varieties of English. In P. Skandera (Ed.), Phraseology and culture in English (pp. 399–435). Berlin & New York: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) World Englishes. A cognitive sociolinguistic approach. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Peters, Arne
2021.  In Cultural Linguistics and World Englishes [Cultural Linguistics, ], ► pp. 333 ff. Crossref logo
Peters, Arne & Susan Coetzee-Van Rooy
2020. Exploring the interplay of language and body in South African youth: A portrait-corpus study. Cognitive Linguistics 31:4 ► pp. 579 ff. Crossref logo
Polzenhagen, Frank
2021.  In Cultural Linguistics and World Englishes [Cultural Linguistics, ], ► pp. 217 ff. Crossref logo
Torres Soler, Julio
2021. Variation in embodied metaphors: a contrastive analysis of taste metaphors in Spanish and English. Complutense Journal of English Studies 29 ► pp. 21 ff. Crossref logo
Zadobrivscaia, O. F. & V. G. Egorova
2021. Categorization of Political Terms in the Image and Likeness of the Container. Bulletin of Kemerovo State University 23:3 ► pp. 773 ff. Crossref logo
Zhang, Xinxin, Yaxuan Li, Xiangyu Chao & Yingli Li
2022. Sourness impacts envy and jealousy in Chinese culture. Psychological Research Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 08 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.