Metaphor variation of spatial conceptualizations in Irish English
A methodological design
The current paper offers a novel methodological approach to gathering rich spatial data from Irish English speakers, showing variation in the cognition of physical and conceptual space. A mixed method study was conducted to gather conceptual and sociolinguistic data. This includes the first part of the data gathering: a structured interview, focusing on geographic aspects of the town and two wayfinding exercises. I then describe the second part of the study: twenty cloze procedure questions relating to a written example, followed by questions relating to seventeen hand-drawn images. I take as a baseline the instruments used by, inter alia, Levinson and Wilkins (2006a) and apply them to a within-culture study. I conclude this paper by discussing replicability and future studies. While Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT) offers researchers a model to connect physical and conceptual elements of space, we have not seen a large-scale study of how CMT affects the language of space in varieties of English.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Background
- 2.1Different types of spatial language
- 2.2Conceptual Metaphor Theory
- 2.3Variation in metaphor
- 2.4How languages vary
- 2.4.1Cross-linguistic studies of spatial reference
- 2.4.2Sociolinguistic variation in Irish English
- 2.4.3Cognitive Sociolinguistics: Variation in understanding
- 3.Methodology
- 3.1Sociolinguistic methods
- 3.2Cross-linguistic spatial methods
- 3.3Cognitive mapping methods
- 3.4The current study
- 3.4.1Recruitment
- 3.4.2Participants
- 3.4.3Transcription
- 3.4.4Coding
- 3.4.5Questionnaire
- 4.Results and analysis
- 4.1Case studies
- 4.2Interviews
- 4.3Questionnaires
- 4.3.1Location metaphor summary
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
-
References
References
References
Berman, R., & Slobin, D.
(
1994)
Relating events in narrative: a crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bowerman, M.
(
1996)
The origins of children’s spatial semantic categories: Cognitive versus linguistic determinants. In
J. Gumperz &
S. Levinson (Eds.),
Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 145–176). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carlson, L. A., & Hill, P. L.
Cassidy, F. G.
(
1977)
Notes on nicknames for places in the United States.
American Speech, 521, 19–28.
Chambers, J. K.
(
2002)
Studying language variation: An informal epistemology. In
J. K. Chambers,
P. Trudgill &
N. Schilling-Estes (Eds.),
The handbook of language variation and change (pp. 3–14). Oxford: Blackwell.
Chilton, P.
(
2010)
Introduction. In
V. Evans &
P. Chilton (Eds.),
Language, cognition and space: The state of the art and new directions (pp. 1–18). London: Equinox.
Central Statistics Office of Ireland
(
2012)
Census 2011 population classified by area. Dublin: Stationary Office.
[URL] (Last accessed on May 12 2016)
Coventry, K. R., & Prat-Sala, M.
(
2001)
Object-specific function, geometry and the comprehension of “in” and “on”.
European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 131, 509–528.
Filppula, M.
(
1991)
Urban and rural varieties of Hiberno-English. In
J. Cheshire (Ed.),
English around the world: Sociolinguistic perspectives (pp. 51–60). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Geeraerts, D., Kristiansen, G., & Peirsman, Y.
(Eds.) (
2010a.)
Advances in cognitive sociolinguistics. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.
Geeraerts, D., Kristiansen, G., & Peirsman, Y.
(
2010b)
Introduction. In
D. Geeraerts,
G. Kristiansen, &
Y. Peirsman (Eds.),
Advances in cognitive sociolinguistics (pp. 1–20). Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.
Haviland, J. B.
(
1998)
Guugu Yimithirr Cardinal Directions.
Ethos, 261, 25–47.
Hickey, R.
(
2007)
Irish English: History and present-day forms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kerswill, P., & Williams, A.
(
2000)
Creating a new town koiné – Children and language change in Milton Keynes.
Language in Society, 291, 65–115.
Kitchin, R., & Blades, M.
(
2002)
The cognition of geographic space. London: I.B. Tauris.
Kövecses, Z.
(
2005)
Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kövecses, Z.
(
2006)
Language, mind, and culture: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kortmann, B., & Upton, C.
(Eds.) (
2008)
Varieties of English. Volume 1: The British Isles. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.
Kristiansen, G., & Dirven, R.
(Eds.) (
2008a)
Cognitive sociolinguistics. Language variation, cultural models, social systems. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.
Kristiansen, G., & Dirven, R.
(
2008b)
Introduction: Cognitive sociolinguistics: Rationale, methods and scope. In
G. Kristiansen &
R. Dirven (Eds.),
Cognitive sociolinguistics: Language variation, cultural models, social systems (pp. 1–20). Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.
Kroeger, P. R.
(
2005)
Analyzing grammar: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Labov, W.
(
1972)
Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Labov, W.
(
2001)
Principles of linguistic change. Volume 1: Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(
2003)
Metaphors we live by. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Levinson, S., Meira, S.
, & The Language and Cognition Group, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics (
2003)
'Natural concepts' in the spatial topological domain – Adpositional meanings in crosslinguistic perspective: An exercise in semantic typology.
Language, 791, 485–516.
Levinson, S., & Wilkins, D.
(Eds.) (
2006a)
Grammars of space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, S., & Wilkins, D.
(
2006b)
The background to the study of language and space. In
S. Levinson &
D. Wilkins (Eds.),
Grammars of space (pp. 1–23). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, S., & Wilkins, D.
(
2006c)
Patterns in the data: towards a semantic typology of spatial description. In
S. Levinson &
D. Wilkins (Eds.),
Grammars of space (pp. 512–552). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lucek, S.
(
2017)
UP town and DOWN town: The INs and OUTs of how Navan residents conceptualise the town where they live.
English Language Research, 21, 106–125.
Numbers
[Computer software] (
2015).
Pages
[Computer software] (
2015).
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., and Svartvik, J.
(
1985)
A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
Robinson, J. A.
(
2010)
Awesome insights into semantic variation. In
D. Geeraerts,
G. Kristiansen &
Y. Peirsman (Eds.),
Advances in cognitive sociolinguistics (pp. 85–110). Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.
Schilling-Estes, N.
(
2007)
Sociolinguistic fieldwork. In
R. Bayley &
C. Lucas (Eds.),
Sociolinguistic variation: Theories, methods, and applications (pp. 165–189). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Solheim, R.
(
2009)
Dialect development in a melting pot: The formation of a new culture and a new dialect in the industrial town of Høyanger.
Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 321, 191–206.
Tagliamonte, S.
(
2006)
Analysing sociolinguistic variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wavelab LE 7
[Computer software] (
2011).
Wolf, H. -G., & Polzenhagen, F.
(
2009)
World Englishes. A cognitive sociolinguistic approach. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Skichko, Anastasiia S., Sandrine Peraldi & Stephen Lucek
2023.
“PEOPLE MATTER. FREEDOM MATTERS. PEACE MATTERS”: CONCEPTUAL METAPHOR ANALYSIS OF VOLODYMYR ZELENSKYY’S SPEECHES.
Alfred Nobel University Journal of Philology 2:26/2
► pp. 173 ff.
Zadobrivscaia, O. F. & V. G. Egorova
2021.
Categorization of Political Terms in the Image and Likeness of the Container.
Bulletin of Kemerovo State University 23:3
► pp. 773 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.