Book review
R. C. Berwick and N. Chomsky: Why Only Us: Language and Evolution
Article outline
- Final thoughts
- Acknowledgements
-
References
References (28)
References
Binder, J., & Desai, R. (2011). The neurobiology of semantic memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(11), 527–536. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brandon, R., & Hornstein, N. (1986). From icons to symbols: Some speculations on the origins of language. Biology and Philosophy, 11, 169–189. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bunge, M. (2014). The mind–body problem: A psychobiological approach. London: Pergamon.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cardona, J., et al. (2014). How embodied is action language? Neurological evidence from motor diseases. Cognition, 131(2), 311–322. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cevasco, J., & Marmolejo-Ramos, F. (2013). The importance of studying the role of Prosody in the comprehension of spontaneous spoken discourse. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 45 (1), 21–33.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chatterjee, A. (2010). Disembodying cognition. Language and Cognition, 2(1), 79–116. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N. (1994). Language and thought. Washington, D.C.: Moyer Bell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, A. (1998). Embodiment and the philosophy of mind. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 431, 35–51. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dahl, C., Rasch, M., Tomonaga, M., & Adachi, I. (2013). The face inversion effect in non-human primates revisited: An investigation in chimpanzees (Pan Troglodytes). Scientific Reports, 31. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Evans, N., & Levinson, S. (2009). The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(05), 429–448. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fernandino, L., et al. (2016). Concept representation reflects multimodal abstraction: A framework for embodied semantics. Cerebral Cortex, 26 (5), 2018–2034. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fitch, W. & Hauser, M. (2004). Computational constraints on syntactic processing in a nonhuman primate. Science, 303(5656), 377–380. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gentner, T., Fenn, K., Margoliash, D., & Nusbaum, H. (2006). Recursive syntactic pattern learning by Songbirds. Nature, 440(7088), 1204–1207. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Glenberg, A. (2015). Few believe the world is flat: How embodiment is changing the scientific understanding of cognition. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(2), 165–171. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harnad, S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 42(1–3), 335–346. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. Cognitive Science, 4(2), 195–208. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lenneberg, E. (1964). A biological perspective of language. In E. Lenneberg (Ed.), New Directions in the Study of Language (pp. 65–88). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lenneberg, E. (1962). The relationship of language to the formation of concepts. Synthese, 14(2), 103–109. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leshinskaya, A., & Caramazza, A. (2016). For a cognitive neuroscience of concepts: moving beyond the grounding issue. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1–11. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mahon, B. (2015). The burden of embodied cognition. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(2), 172–178. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Merritt, D., Casasanto, D., & Brannon, E. (2010). Do monkeys think in metaphors? Representations of space and time in monkeys and humans. Cognition, 117(2), 191–202. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pinker, S. (1995). The language instinct: The new science of language and mind. London. Penguin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Poyatos, F. (1984). The multichannel reality of discourse: Language-paralanguage-kinesics and the totality of communicative systems. Language Sciences, 6(2), 307–337. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pulvermüller, F. (2013). How neurons make meaning: Brain mechanisms for embodied and abstract-symbolic semantics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(9), 458–470. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Smith, L., & Colunga, E. (2012). Developing categories and concepts. In M. Spivey, K. McRae, & M. Joanisse (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 283–308). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Toivonen, I., Csúri, P., & van der Zee, E. (Eds.) (2016). Structures in the mind. Essays on language, music, and cognition in honor of Ray Jackendoff. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vannasing, P., et al. (2016). Distinct hemispheric specializations for native and non-native languages in one-day-old newborns identified by fNIRS. Neuropsychologia, 841, 63–69. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)