Article published In:
Vol. 45:2 (2019) ► pp.211245
Boers, Frank
1996Spatial Prepositions and Metaphor: A Cognitive Semantic Journey Along the Up-Down and the Front-Back Dimensions. Tübingen, Germany: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Boroditsky, Lera
2000Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition 75.1:1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
2001Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William, and Alan Cruse
2004Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deng, Fang
2006Fangwei Jiegou “X Zhong/Li/Nei” Bijiao Yanjiu [A Contrastive Study of the Locative Structures “X Zhong/Li/Nei ”]. MA thesis, Jinan University, Canton.Google Scholar
Dewell, Robert B.
2005Dynamic patterns of containment. From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Beate Hampe and Joseph E. Grady, 369–393. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan, and Andrea Tyler
2004Spatial experience, lexical structure and motivation: The case of in . Studies in Linguistic Motivation, ed. by Günter Radden and Klaus-Uwe Panther, 157–192. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Firth, John Rupert
1957A synopsis of linguistic theory, 1930–55. Studies in Linguistic Analysis, ed. by John Rupert Firth, 1–31. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gibbs, Jr. Raymond W.
2005Embodiment and Cognitive Science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
2006The verb slot in causative constructions: Finding the best fit. Constructions S1.3:1–46.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
2006Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th
2009Quantitative Corpus Linguistics with R: A Practical Introduction. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th., and Anatol Stefanowitsch
2004aCo-varying collexemes in the into-causative. Language, Culture, and Mind, ed. by Michel Achard and Suzanne Kemmer, 225–236. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
2004bExtending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9.1:97–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th., and Nick C. Ellis
2015Statistical measures for usage-based linguistics. Language Learning 65.S1:228–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, Chu-Ren, and Keh-jiann Chen
2010Academia sinica balanced corpus of modern Chinese 4.0. Academia Sinica. Retrieved January 13, 2016, from [URL]
Hunston, Susan, and Gill Francis
2000Pattern Grammar: A Corpus-Driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1983Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Janda, Laura A.
2013Quantitative methods in cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Cognitive Linguistics: The Quantitative Turn, ed. by Laura A. Janda, 1–32. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Mark
1987The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Mark, and George Lakoff
2002Why cognitive linguistics requires embodied realism. Cognitive Linguistics 13.3:245–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George
1987Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993The contemporary theory of metaphor. Metaphor and Thought, ed. by Andrew Ortony, 202–251. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
1980Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1991aConcept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
1991bFoundations of Cognitive Grammar: Descriptive Application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1997Constituency, dependency, and conceptual grouping. Cognitive Linguistics 8.1:1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen, Sérgio Meira, and The Language and Cognition Group
2003‘Natural concepts’ in the spatial topological domain – adpositional meanings in crosslinguistic perspective: An exercise in semantic typology. Language 79.3:485–516. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindstromberg, Seth
2010English Prepositions Explained: Revised Edition. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mandler, Jean Matter, and Cristóbal Pagán Cánovas
2014On defining image schemas. Language and Cognition 6.4:510–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Menzel, Peter
1975Semantics and Syntax in Complementation. Hague, Netherlands: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, George Armitage, and Philip N. Johnson-Laird
1976Language and Perception. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi, and Sandra A. Thompson
1996Interaction and syntax in the structure of conversational discourse: Collaboration, overlap, and syntactic dissociation. Computational and Conversational Discourse: Burning Issues – An Interdisciplinary Account, ed. by Eduard H. Hovy and Donia R. Scott, 67–96. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pollio, Howard R., Lance B. Fagan, Thomas R. Graves, and Priscilla Levasseur
2005The semantics of space: Experiential and linguistic aspects of selected English spatial terms. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 34.2:133–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandra, Dominiek, and Sally Rice
1995Network analyses of prepositional meaning: Mirroring whose mind – the linguist’s or the language user’s? Cognitive Linguistics 6.1:89–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, John
1991Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol, and Stefan Th. Gries
2003Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8.2:209–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005Covarying Collexemes. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1.1:1–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Svorou, Soteria
1994The Grammar of Space. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1983How language structures space. Spatial Orientation: Theory, Research, and Application, ed. by Herbert L. Pick, Jr. and Linda P. Acredolo, 225–282. New York, NY: Plenum Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2005The clause as a locus of grammar and interaction. Discourse Studies 7.4–5:481–505. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael
2003Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, Andrea, and Vyvyan Evans
2001Reconsidering prepositional polysemy networks: The case of over . Language 77.4:724–765. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003The Semantics of English Prepositions: Spatial Scenes, Embodied Meaning, and Cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xing, Fu Yi
1996Fangwei jiegou “X li” yu “X zhong” [The locative structure “X li” and “X zhong ”]. Shijie Hanyu Jiaoxue 41:4–15.Google Scholar
Yang, Hui
2008Ronchi fangweici li zei zhong wai de kongjian yiyi [The spatial meaning of words of containers li, nei, zhong, wai ]. Shichuan Jiaoyu Xuebao 24.12:74–76.Google Scholar
Zaenen, Annie, Jean Carletta, Gregory Garretson, Joan Bresnan, Andrew Koontz-Garboden, Tatiana Nikitina, M. Catherine O’Connor, and Tom Wasow
2004Animacy encoding in English: Why and how. Proceedings of the 2004 ACL Workshop on Discourse Annotation, ed. by Bonnie Webber and Donna Byron, 118–125. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zeng, Chuan-lu
2005 “Li, zhong, nei, wai” fangwei yinyu de renzhi fenxi [A cognitive analysis of the orientational metaphors in “li, zhong, nei, wai ”]. Guizhou Daxue Xuebao (Shehui Kexue Ban) 11:104–107.Google Scholar
Zhang, Jin Sheng, and Yun Hung Liu
2008 “Li” “zhong” “nei” kongjian yiyi de renzhi yuyanxue kaocha [A cognitive linguistic analysis of the spatial meanings of li, zhong, and nei ]. Jiefangjun Waiguoyu Xueyuan Xuebao 31.3:7–12.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Chen, Alvin Cheng-Hsien
2022. Words, constructions and corpora: Network representations of constructional semantics for Mandarin space particles. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 18:2  pp. 209 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.