Cover not available
Article published In:
Concentric
Vol. 46:1 (2020) ► pp.95–123

Chinese learners’ use of concessive connectors in English argumentative writing

| National Taipei University of Business
| Feng Chia University
| Feng Chia University

A learner corpus, i.e., a principled collection of contextualized texts produced by second language learners, can be of invaluable help in identifying learners’ needs. Previous learner corpus research has indicated that an area for improvement in second language writing is learners’ use of logical connectors as cohesive devices. While most previous studies have been general surveys that examined a wide range of English connectors, the present one is a more focused investigation, probing into Chinese-speaking learners’ use of concessive connectors. The data is taken from a self-constructed corpus of argumentative essays written by Taiwanese freshmen, who were placed into four proficiency levels. Common errors, including orthographical, syntactic, and semantic ones, were identified and categorized. The frequency distribution of the attested concessive connectors reveals Chinese learners’ development in their use of individual connectors. Difficulties may be attributed to the linguistic complexity of concessive connectors in English and L1 transfer. Moreover, previously identified lexico-syntactic characteristics in learners’ use of English connectors were reconfirmed by our corpus data. More importantly, the pragmatic function of concessive connectors in Chinese learners’ argumentative writing is also addressed. The findings have important pedagogical implications. Pragmatics is an area in need of further attention in learner corpus research, and we have gone some way toward enhancing our understanding of that area.

Keywords: concessive connector, argumentative writing, learner corpus, L1 transfer, pragmatics, cohesion
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1Concession in English
    • 2.2Concession in Chinese
    • 2.3Learners’ use of English connectors in their writing
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Learner corpus data
    • 3.2Selection of English concessive connectors for analysis
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Common errors in Chinese learners’ use of English concessive connectors
    • 4.2Frequency distribution of concessive connectors in Chinese learners’ English argumentative writing
    • 4.3Lexico-syntactic features in Chinese learners’ use of concessive connectors in English argumentative writing
    • 4.4Communicative functions of concessive connectors in Chinese learners’ English argumentative writing
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1L1 transfer in Chinese learners’ use of concessive connectors
    • 5.2Pedagogical implications
    • 5.3Future directions
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 1 May 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/consl.00014.hsu
References
Altenberg, Bengt, and Marie Tapper
1998 The use of adverbial connectors in advanced Swedish learners’ written English. Learner English on Computer, ed. by Sylviane Granger, 80–93. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bell, David M.
2010  Nevertheless, still, and yet: Concessive cancellative discourse markers. Journal of Pragmatics 42.7:1912–1927. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berk, Lynn M.
1999 English Syntax: From Word to Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, and Federica Barbieri
2007 Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers. English for Specific Purposes 26.3:263–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan
1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London & New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Bolton, Kingsley, Gerald Nelson, and Joseph Hung
2002 A Corpus-based study of connectors in student writing: Research from The International Corpus of English in Hong Kong (ICE-HK). International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 7.2:165–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carbonell-Olivares, María
2009 A corpus-based analysis of the meaning and function of although . International Journal of English Studies 9.3:191–208.Google Scholar
Celce-Murcia, Marianne, and Diane Larsen-Freeman
1999 The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher’s Course (2nd edition). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.Google Scholar
Chen, Cheryl Wei-yu
2006 The use of conjunctive adverbials in the academic papers of advanced Taiwanese EFL learners. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 11.1:113–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, Rong
1993 Responding to compliments: A contrastive study of politeness strategies between American English and Chinese speakers. Journal of Pragmatics 20.1:49–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheung, Candice Chi-Hang
2016 Chinese: Parts of speech. The Routledge Encyclopedia of the Chinese Language, ed. by Chan Sin-Wai, 242–294. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cheung, Hintat, Jessica Wu, Zhao-Ming Gao, and Siaw-Fong Chung
2011 The Construction of the LTTC English Learner Corpus: Progress Report of NTU-LTTC Joint Research Project on Language Teaching and Language Testing. Retrieved May 17, 2019, from [URL]
Chu, Chauncey Cheng-hsi
1998 A Discourse Grammar of Mandarin Chinese. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Sandra A. Thompson
2005 A linguistic practice for retracting overstatements: ‘Concessive repair’. Syntax and Lexis in Conversation: Studies on the Use of Linguistic Resources in Talk-in-interaction, ed. by Auli Hakulinen and Margret Selting, 257–288. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crewe, William J.
1990 The illogic of logical connectives. ELT Journal 44.4:316–325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crewe, William J., Christine L. Wright, and Matthew Wing-Kwong Leung
1985 Connectives: On the other hand, who needs them though? Working Papers in Linguistics and Language Teaching 81:61–75.Google Scholar
Field, Yvette, and Lee Mee Oi Yip
1992 A comparison of internal conjunctive cohesion in the English essay writing of Cantonese speakers and native speakers of English. RELC Journal 23.1:15–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frodesen, Jan, and Janet Eyring
2000 Grammar Dimensions: Form, Meaning, and Use (Book 4) (2nd edition). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.Google Scholar
Gao, Xia
2016 A cross-disciplinary corpus-based study on English and Chinese native speakers’ use of linking adverbials in academic writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 241:14–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granger, Sylviane, and Stephanie Tyson
1996 Connector usage in the English essay writing of native and non-native EFL speakers of English. World Englishes 15.1:17–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gu, Yueguo
1990 Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics 14.2:237–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., and Ruqaiya Hasan
1976 Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hirvela, Alan
2017 Argumentation and second language writing: Are we missing the boat? Journal of Second Language Writing 361:69–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, Chu-Ren, Shu-Kai Hsieh, and Keh-Jiann Chen
2017 Mandarin Chinese Words and Parts of Speech: A Corpus-based Study. London & New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita
2008 Contrast, concessive, and corrective: Toward a comprehensive study of opposition relations. Journal of Pragmatics 40.4:646–675. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Deanna
1991 The Skills of Argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuzborska, Irena, and Bill Soden
2018 The construction of opposition relations in high-, middle-, and low-rated postgraduate ESL Chinese students’ essays. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 341:68–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, Robin
1971 If’s, and’s and but’s about conjunctions. Studies in Linguistic Semantics, ed. by Charles J. Fillmore and D. Terence Langėndoen, 115–150. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Lam, Yau Wai, Khe Foon Hew, and Kin Fung Chiu
2018 Improving argumentative writing: Effects of a blended learning approach and gamification. Language Learning & Technology 22.1:97–118.Google Scholar
Lei, Lei
2012 Linking adverbials in academic writing on applied linguistics by Chinese doctoral students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 11.3:267–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Charles N., and Sandra A. Thompson
1981 Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lin, Wen-Pin
2014 Effects of Explicit Instruction on the Uses of Conjunctions to EFL College Students’ Essay Writing. MA thesis, National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi.Google Scholar
Liu, Meihua, and George Braine
2005 Cohesive features in argumentative writing produced by Chinese undergraduates. System 33.4:623–636. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mahlberg, Michaela
2009 Lexical cohesion: Corpus linguistic theory and its application in English language teaching. Lexical Cohesion and Corpus Linguistics, ed. by John Flowerdew and Michaela Mahlberg, 103–122. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mann, William C., and Sandra A. Thompson
1988 Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text 8.3:243–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milton, John, and Elza Shuk-Ching Tsang
1993 A corpus-based study of logical connectors in EFL students’ writing: Directions for future research. Lexis in Studies, ed. by Richard Perbertom and Elza Shuk-Ching Tsang, 215–246. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
Musi, Elena
2018 How did you change my view? A corpus-based study of concessions’ argumentative role. Discourse Studies 20.2:270–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narita, Masumi, Chieko Sato, and Masatoshi Sugiura
2004 Connector usage in the English essay writing of Japanese EFL learners. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, ed. by Maria Teresa Lino, Maria Francisca Xavier, Fátima Ferreira, Rute Costa and Raquel Silva, 1171–1174. Paris, France: European Language Resources Association.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, E. Michael, and Gregory Schraw
2007 Promoting argument-counterargument integration in students’ writing. The Journal of Experimental Education 76.1:59–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paquot, Magali, and Luke Plonsky
2017 Quantitative research methods and study quality in learner corpus research. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 3.1:61–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London & New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Rayson, Paul
2008 From key words to key semantic domains. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 13.4:519–549. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salkie, Raphael, and Sarah Louise Oates
1999 Contrast and concession in French and English. Languages in Contrast 2.1:27–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shih, Rebecca Hsue-Hueh
2000 Compiling Taiwanese learner corpus of English. International Journal of Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing 5.2:87–100.Google Scholar
Taboada, Maite, and María de los Ángeles Gómez-González
2012 Discourse markers and coherence relations: Comparison across markers, languages and modalities. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 6.1–3:17–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tanskanen, Sanna-Kaisa, and Johanna Karhukorpi
2008 Concessive Repair and negotiation of affiliation in e-mail discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 40.9:1587–1600. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Geoff
1996 Introducing Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Tono, Yukio
2012 International Corpus of Crosslinguistic Interlanguage: Project overview and a case study on the acquisition of new verb co-occurrence patterns. Developmental and Crosslinguistic Perspectives in Learner Corpus Research, ed. by Yukio Tono, Yuji Kawaguchi and Makoto Minegishi, 27–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsou, Benjamin K., and Olivia Oi Yee Kwong
2015 Some basic and salient linguistic features across Chinese speech communities from a corpus linguistics perspective. The Oxford Handbook of Chinese Linguistics, ed. by William S-Y. Wang and Chaofen Sun, 601–614. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen, Richard Rieke, and Allan Janik
1990 An Introduction to Reasoning (2nd edition). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Vyatkina, Nina, and D. Joseph Cunningham
2015 Learner corpora and pragmatics. The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research, ed. by Sylviane Granger, Gaëtanelle Gilquin and Fanny Meunier, 281–306. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Webster, Michael A., Alan Ward, and Kenneth Craig
1987 Language errors due to the first language inference (Cantonese) produced by Hong Kong students of English. Institute of Language in Education Journal 31:63–81.Google Scholar
Yang, Wenxing, and Ying Sun
2012 The use of cohesive devices in argumentative writing by Chinese EFL learners at different proficiency levels. Linguistics and Education 23.1:31–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yeung, Lorrita
2009 Use and misuse of ‘besides’: A corpus study comparing native speakers’ and learners’ English. System 37.2:330–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Saleem, Aisha, Tahir Saleem & Asif Aziz
2022. A pragmatic study of congratulation strategies of Pakistani ESL learners and British English speakers. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education 7:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.