Cover not available
Article In:
Concentric
Vol. 50:2 (2024) ► pp.200–242

Encoding complex speech acts via sentence final particles

New evidence from the Changsha dialect (Xiang Chinese)

| The Education University of Hong Kong
This paper examines the use of the sentence final particle tai (呔) in the Changsha dialect (Xiang Chinese). It is demonstrated that tai encodes complex speech acts: on the one hand, it expresses the speaker’s high degree of certainty about the truth value of the associated proposition p; on the other, it seeks the addressee’s confirmation, via an implicitly entailed biased question, of the truth value of p. In view of the discursive interplay between the speaker and the addressee expressed by tai, the present study adopts a syntax-pragmatics interface approach to the syntax of tai, decomposing the complex speech acts it conveys into three functional projections at the structural level. Two are related to the speaker’s and the addressee’s knowledge/belief in the utterance (i.e., GroundSpkrP and GroundAdrP) and one is responsible for the speaker’s call on the addressee to confirm (i.e., ResponseP). This study contributes to cross-linguistic investigations on the grammatical realization of complex speech acts, an area which remains in its infancy. Tai represents a new type of grammatical strategy for expressing complex speech acts, that is, to encode the speaker’s commitment and the addressee’s engagement via a single lexical element without any particular intonation pattern.
Keywords: complex speech acts, sentence final particle, speaker’s commitment, call on addressee, syntax-pragmatic interface
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Complex speech acts: An overview of cross-linguistic phenomena
  • 3.Linguistic phenomenon: SFP tai in Changsha dialect
    • 3.1SFP system in Changsha dialect and distribution of tai
    • 3.2Speaker-oriented properties of tai
    • 3.3Speaker-addressee interplay encoded by tai
  • 4.Syntax of complex speech acts
    • 4.1 Tai and complex speech acts
    • 4.2Working hypothesis
    • 4.3Proposal: Syntax of SFP system in Changsha dialect
  • 5.Consequences and further discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • List of abbreviations
  • Author queries
  • References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References (41)
References
Austin, John L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bao, Houxin, Zhenhua Cui, Ruoyun Shen, and Yunji Wu (eds.) 1998. Changsha Fangyan Cidian [Dictionary of Changsha Dialect]. Nanjing, China: Jiangsu Education Publishing House.Google Scholar
Beyssade, Claire, and Jean-Marie Marandin. 2006. The speech act assignment problem revisited: Disentangling speaker’s commitment from speaker’s call on addressee. Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 61:37–68.Google Scholar
Bussmann, Hadumod. 1999. Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gazdar, Gerald. 1981. Speech act assignment. Elements of Discourse Understanding, ed. by Aravind Joshi, Bonnie Webber and Ivan A. Sag, 64–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ginzburg, Jonathan, and Ivan A. Sag. 2000. Interrogative Investigations: The Form, Meaning, and Use of English Interrogatives. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 2000. Remnant movement and OV order. The Derivation of VO and OV, ed. by Peter Svenonius, 69–96. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Antisymmetry and verb-final order in West Flemish. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 3.31:207–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Lililane, and Virginia Hill. 2013. The syntacticization of discourse. Syntax and its Limits, eds. by Raffaella Folli, Christina Sevdali and Robert Truswell, 370–390. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heim, Johannes, Hermann Keupdjio, Zoe Wai-Man Lam, Adriana Osa-Go´mez, and Martina Wiltschko. 2014. How to do things with particles. Proceedings of the 2014 Annual conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association, ed. by Laura Teddiman, 1–15. St. Catharines, Canada: Canadian Linguistic Association.Google Scholar
Heim, Johannes, Hermann Keupdjio, Zoe Wai-Man Lam, Adriana Osa-Go´mez, Sonja Thoma, and Martina Wiltschko. 2016. Intonation and particles as speech act modifiers: A syntactic analysis. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 37.21:109–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heim, Johannes, and Martina Wiltschko. 2020. Deconstructing questions: Reanalyzing a heterogenous class of speech acts via commitment and engagement. Scandinavian Studies in Language 11.11:56–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland. 2000. Licensing movement and stranding in the West Germanic OV languages. The Derivation of VO and OV, ed. by Peter Svenonius, 293–326. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ho, Dah-an. 1987. Shengyunxui Zhong de Guannian he Fangfa [The Concept and Methods of Phonology]. Taipei: Dahan Press.Google Scholar
Hu, Ping. 2002. Changsha fangyan yuqici yanjiu [A study on modal words in the Changsha dialect]. Hunan Jingji Guanli Ganbu Xueyuan Xuebao 13.41:108–110.Google Scholar
Huang, Yan. 2007. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jung, Verena, and Angela Schrott. 2003. A question of time? Question types and speech act shifts from a historical-contrastive perspective. Meaning Through Language Contrast, vol 21, ed. by M. Jaszczolt and Ken Turner, 345–371. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard Stanley. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Koopman, Hilda Judith, and Anna Szabolcsi. 2000. Verbal Complexes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lam, Zoe Wai-Man. 2014. A complex ForceP for speaker — and addressee-oriented discourse particles in Cantonese. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 35.21:61–80.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miró, Elena Castroviejo. 2008. Deconstructing exclamations. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 71:41–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munaro, Nicola, and Cecilia Poletto. 2002. Ways of clausal typing. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 271:87–105.Google Scholar
Norman, Jerry. 1988. Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pearson, Matthew. 2000. Two types of VO languages. The Derivation of VO and OV, ed. by Peter Svenonius, 327–363. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Portner, Paul. 2004. The semantics of imperatives within a theory of clause types. Proceedings from the 14th Semantics and Linguistic Theory, ed. by Robert B. Young, 235–252. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richards, Jack Croft, and Richard W. Schmidt. 2010. Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics (4th edition). London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold M. 1974. Towards a Linguistic Theory of Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John Rogers. 1979. Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Speas, Peggy, and Carol Tenny. 2003. Configurational properties of point of view roles. Asymmetry in Grammar, ed. by Anna Maria di Sciullo, 315–345. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tang, Sze-Wing. 2010. Xingshi Hanyu Jufaxue [Formal Chinese Syntax]. Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Publishing House.Google Scholar
. 2015. Yueyu Yufa Jiangyi [Lectures on Cantonese Grammar]. Hong Kong: Commercial Press.Google Scholar
. 2020. Cartographic syntax of performative projections: Evidence from Cantonese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 29.11:1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiltschko, Martina. 2014. The Universal Structure of Categories: Towards a Formal Typology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. The Grammar of Interactional Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiltschko, Martina, and Johannes Heim. 2016. The syntax of confirmationals: A neo-performative analysis. Outside the Clause: Form and Function of Extra-Clausal Constituent, ed. by Gunther Kaltenböck, Evelien Keizer and Arne Lohmann, 303–340. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wu, Yunji. 2005. A Synchronic and Diachronic Study of the Grammar of the Chinese Xiang Dialects. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, Xiaodong, and Martina Wiltschko. 2016. The confirmational marker ha in Northern Mandarin. Journal of Pragmatics 1041:67–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Ling, and Tang Sze Wing. 2016. Xianggang yueyu jumo zhuci shengdiao yu judiao guanxi de chutan [Preliminary studies on tones of sentence-final particles and intonation in Cantonese]. Yunlü Yanjiu [Prosodic Studies], vol 11, ed. by Shengli Feng, 113–127. Beijing: Science Press.Google Scholar
Zheng, Tingting, and Haoping Yue. 2014. Hunan fangyan jumo yuqici yanjiu zongshu [An overview on studies of sentence final modal particles in Hunan dialects]. Hubei Guangbo Dianshi Daxue Xuebao 34.81:77–78.Google Scholar