Cover not available
Article In:
Concentric
Vol. 50:2 (2024) ► pp.243–259

Special pronominal forms in Saaroa

| Academia Sinica
Saaroa has a special set of pronominal forms not found in most other Formosan languages, as first noted by Pan (2018). This study departs from his claims that these forms only function as plurals. In fact, extensive Saaroa texts collected by different linguists (Li 2023) at different periods of time indicate that they can be either singular or plural. The functions of both the special free and bound forms will be clarified. Above all, they are contrastive. The origin of the special forms in Saaroa is suggested as a diffusion from Kanakanavu, which has similar forms with similar functions recorded earlier and is geographically adjacent. That the first person plural forms may function as singular is found not only in a few other Formosan languages, but also in unrelated languages. This study has thus cross-linguistic evidence and implications for languages in general.
Keywords: Formosan, Saaroa, pronoun, contrastive, change of function
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The special set of pronominal forms
  • 3.The special set of pronominal forms as attested in texts
  • 4.Summary and discussion
    • 4.1Plural pronouns used as singular
    • 4.2The origin of the special forms in Saaroa
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • List of abbreviations
  • References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References (23)
References
Biq, Yung-O. 1991. The multiple uses of the second person singular pronoun ni in conversational Mandarin. Journal of Pragmatics 16.41:307–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howe, Stephen. 1996. The Personal Pronouns in the Germanic Languages: A Study of Personal Pronoun Morphology and Change in the Germanic Languages from the First Records to the Present Day. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, Fuhui. 2007. Language of Emotion and Thinking in Kavalan and Saisiyat. Doctoral dissertation, National Taiwan University, Taipei.
Huang, Lillian, Elizabeth Zeitoun, Marie Mei-li Yeh, Anna Hsiu-chuan Chang, and Joy Jing-lan Wu. 1999. A typological study of pronominal systems in some Formosan languages. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Chinese Linguistics, ed. by H. Samuel Wang, Feng-fu Tsao and Chin-fa Lien, 165–198. Hsinchu: National Tsing Hua University.Google Scholar
Huang, Lillian Mei-chin, and Tali’ Hayung. 2018. Taiyayu Yufa Gailun [Atayal Sketch Grammar]. Taipei: Yuanzhuminzu Weiyuanhui [Council of Indigenous Peoples].Google Scholar
Katsuki, Matsumoto. 2010. Sekaigengo no Ninsyou Daimeisi to Sono Keihu: Zinrui Gengosi Nen no Asiato [Personal Pronouns of the World’s Languages and Their Genetic Relationship: An Attempt to Trace the Human Language History for the Past Fifty Millennia]. Tokyo: Sanseido.Google Scholar
Li, Chao-lin. 2010. The Syntax and Semantics of Eventuality in Paiwan and Saaroa. Doctoral dissertation, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu.
Li, Paul Jen-kuei. 1995. The case-marking system in Mayrinax, Atayal. Bulletin of Institute of History and Philology 66.11:23–52.Google Scholar
. 1997. Shaalua [Saaroa]. The Formosan languages of Kaohsiung, ed. by Paul Jen-kuei Li, 272–297. Kaohsiung: Kaohsiung County Government.Google Scholar
(ed.) 2023. Saaroa Texts by T’ung-ho Tung, Shigeru Tsuchida, Pang-hsin Ting, Paul Jen-kuei Li, and Chia-jung Pan. Toyko: Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
Lin, Hsiu-che, Jozsef Szakos, and Ren-gui You. 2012. Laaluwayu Cidian [Saaroa Dictionary]. Retrieved July 8, 2021, from [URL]
Lovestrand, Joseph. 2018. Plural addressee marker and grammaticalization in Barayin. Journal of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics 10.11:52–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lü, Shu-xiang. 1984. Shi nin, an, za, zan, fulunmenzi [Explicating pronominal plural markers nin, an, za, zan in Early Mandarin] Hanyu Yufa Lunwenji [Studies on Chinese Grammar], ed. by Shu-xiang Lü, 1–37. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Ogawa, Naoyoshi, and Erin Asai. 1935. The Myths and Traditions of the Formosan Native Tribes. Taipei: Taihoku Teikoku Daigaku Gengo-gaku Kenkyu-shitsu [Linguistics Research Center, Taipei Imperial University].Google Scholar
Pan, Chia-jung. 2012. A Grammar of Lha’alua, an Austronesian Languages of Taiwan. Doctoral dissertation, James Cook University, Cairns, Australia.
. 2018. Laaluwayu Yufagailun [Saaroa Sketch Grammar]. Taipei: Yuanzhuminzu Weiyuanhui [Council of Indigenous Peoples].Google Scholar
Sung, Li-May. 2018. Saidekeyu Yufagailun [Seediq Sketch Grammar]. Taipei: Yuanzhuminzu weiyuanhui [Council of Indigenous Peoples].Google Scholar
Szakos, Jozsef, Zhong-qing Yu, Ren-gui You, and Yun-ting Wang. 2000. Nanzou Shaaluayu [Saaroa Language, Southern Tsouic]. Taipei: Yuanzhuminzu Weiyuanhui [Council of Indigenous Peoples].Google Scholar
Teng, Stacy Fang-ching, and Elizabeth Zeitoun. 2016. The noun-verb distinction in Kanakanavu and Saaroa: Evidence from pronouns. Oceanic Linguistics 55.11:134–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsuchida, Shigeru. 1976. Reconstruction of Proto-Tsouic Phonology. Tokyo: Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
Vladimirou, Dimitra. 2006. ‘I suggest that we need more research’: Personal reference in linguistics journal articles. Proceedings of the Lancaster University Postgraduate Conference in Linguistics and Language Teaching, vol.11, ed. by Costas Gabrielatos, Richard Slessor and J. W. Unger, 139–157. Lancaster, UK: Lancaster University.Google Scholar
Zeitoun, Elizabeth, and Stacy Fang-ching Teng. 2016. Reassessing the position of Kanakanavu and Saaroa among the Formosan languages. Oceanic Linguistics 55.11:162–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2022. Laaluwayu Cilei Jiqi Jiaoxue [Saaroa Word Classes and Language Teaching]. Taipei: Foundation for Research and Development of Indigenous Languages.Google Scholar