Cover not available
Article published In:
Chinese as a Second Language (漢語教學研究—美國中文教師學會學報)
Vol. 54:2 (2019) ► pp.122–144

现代汉语常用文言虚词的语块教学

 | Brigham Young University
现代汉语中保留了许多文言成分，文言虚词的使用是现代汉语书面语体的重要特征之一，不仅让语言表达更为书面，也能够使语言表达更典雅。本文对两组面对汉语二语学习者的词表进行统计，总结出现代汉语中二语学习者需要掌握的常用文言虚词。并提出应重视对现代汉语中的常用文言虚词进行系统性的教学和训练，文言虚词的教学不应局限于词语本身，而需要进行联系和拓展，从词素、词，到词语搭配、固定结构，多层面地为学习者展现文言虚词的用法，进行语块教学。本文在语料库分析的基础上，总结了常用文言虚词的常见语块，包括词语搭配、实词和虚词组合的固定结构、框架结构及话语标记语等类型，并讨论了如何培养学习者的语块学习意识、加强对语块的正确使用、促进对语块语体特征的理解以及引导学习者输出语块四个方面的教学操作问题，以期为汉语作为第二语言的教学和教材编写提供参考｡
Keywords: 文言虚词, 语块教学, 汉语书面语
Article outline
  • 引言
  • 一、面对二语教学的常用文言虚词的选词和排序
  • 二、常用文言虚词的习得问题
  • 三、常用文言虚词的语块分析和教学：以“此”为例
    • 3.1语块和语块教学
    • 3.2常用文言虚词的语块提取
    • 3.3“此”的语块分析及教学
    • 3.4常用文言虚词的语块教学建议
      • 3.4.1以拓展的方式培养语块学习意识
      • 3.4.2通过朗读、填空、替换等练习加强对语块的正确使用
      • 3.4.3通过语体变换练习促进对语块语体特征的理解
      • 3.4.4以完成句子、总结、复述等练习引导学习者输出语块
  • 笔记
  • 参考文献

Article language: Chinese

Published online: 20 March 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/csl.18016.liu
References (40)
参考文献
AlHassan, L., & Wood, D. (2015). The effectiveness of focused instruction of formulaic sequences in augmenting L2 learners’ academic writing skills: A quantitative research study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 171, 51–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bestgen, Y. (2017). Beyond single-word measures: L2 writing assessment, lexical richness and formulaic competence. System, 691, 65–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boers, F., Eyckmans, J., Kappel, J., Stengers, H., & Demecheleer, M. (2006). Formulaic sequences and perceived oral proficiency: Putting a lexical approach to the test. Language teaching research, 10(3), 245–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Confucius Institute Headquarters (Hanban). 国家汉办教育部社科司 (2010). 汉语国际教育用音节汉字词汇等级划分 [Hanyu guoji jiaoyu yong yinjie hanzi cihui dengji huafen: The graded Chinese syllables, characters and words for the application of teaching Chinese to the speakers of other languages], Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University Press.Google Scholar
Cowie, A. P. (1992). Multiword lexical units and communicative language teaching. In P. J. Arnaud, & H. Béjoint (Eds.), Vocabulary and applied linguistics (pp. 1–12). London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feng, S. 冯胜利. (2003). 书面语语法及教学的相对独立性 [Shumianyu Yufa Ji Jiaoxue De Xiangdui Dulixing: An Independent Grammar for Written Chinese in Second Language Teaching]. 语言教学与研究 [Yuyan jiaoxue yu yanjiu: Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies], 21, 53–63.Google Scholar
. (2010). 论语体的机制及其语法属性 [Lun Yuti De Jizhi Ji Qi Yufa Shuxing: On Mechanisums of Register System and Its Grammatical Property]. 中国语文 [Zhongguo Yuwen: Studies of the Chinese Language], 51, 400–412.Google Scholar
Feng, Y. (2000). A learners’ handbook of modern Chinese written expression. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
Guz, E. (2014). Formulaic sequences as fluency devices in the oral production of native speakers of Polish. Research in Language, 12(2), 113–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ji, C. 汲传波. (2017). 日本学生汉语书面语中的口语化情况研究 [Riben Xuesheng Hanyu Shumianyu Zhong De Kouyuhua Qingkuang Yanjiu: Features of Oral Style in Chinese Compositions of Japanese Students]. 江西师范大学学报: 哲学社会科学版 [Jiangxi Shifan Daxue Xuebao: Zhexue Shehui Kexue Ban: Journal of Jiangxi Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)], 50(2), 80–85.Google Scholar
Jin, H. 靳洪刚. (2004) ，语言定式教学法在中文习得和中文教学中的作用 [Yuyan Dingshi Jiaoxuefa Zai Zhongwen Xide He Zhongwen Jiaoxue Zhong De Zuoyong: The Role of Formulaic Speech in Teaching and Learning Patterned Chinese Structures]. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, 39(1), 45–62.Google Scholar
. (2010). 任务复杂度及其互动、输出效应 [Renwu Fuzadu Ji Qi Hudong, Shuchu Xiaoying: Task Complexity and its Effects on Interaction & Production: An Experimental Study of Task-based Instruction]. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, 45 (2), 101–135.Google Scholar
. (2016). 从语言组块研究谈语言定式教学法 [Cong Yuyan Zukuai Yanjiu Tan Yuyan Dingshi Jiaoxuefa: From Research on Formulaic Sequence to Chinese as a Foreign Language Teaching]. 国际汉语教育 [Guoji Hanyu Jiaoyu: International Chinese Language Education], 11, 22–36.Google Scholar
Jones, M. & Haywood, S. (2004). Facilitating the acquisition of formulaic sequences: An exploratory study in an EAP context. In N. Schmitt. (eds), Formulaic sequences (pp. 269–292). John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y. (2008). The contribution of collaborative and individual tasks to the acquisition of L2 vocabulary. The Modern Language Journal, 92(1), 114–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, M. (1993). The lexical approach (Vol. 11, p. 993). Hove: Language teaching publications.Google Scholar
Li, J., & Schmitt, N. (2009). The acquisition of lexical phrases in academic writing: A longitudinal case study. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(2), 85–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Q. (2002). 现代实用汉语修辞 [Xiandai Shiyong Hanyu Xiuci: Modern practical Chinese rhetoric]. Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
Mo, D. 莫丹. (2016). 欧美留学生书面正式语体能力发展研究 [Oumei Liuxuesheng Shumian Zhengshi Yuti Nengli Fazhan Yanjiu: A Study on American and European CSL Students’ Formal Style Development in Chinese Written Register]. 语言教学与研究 [Yuyan jiaoxue yu yanjiu: Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies], 181(5), 20–29.Google Scholar
Nation, P., & Waring, R. (1997). Vocabulary size, text coverage and word lists. In Schmitt, N. and M. McCarthy (Eds), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 6–19), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nattinger, J. R., & DeCarrico, J. S. (1992). Lexical phrases and language teaching. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Serrano, R., Stengers, H., & Housen, A. (2015). Acquisition of formulaic sequences in intensive and regular EFL programmes. Language Teaching Research, 19(1), 89–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Staples, S., Egbert, J., Biber, D., & McClair, A. (2013). Formulaic sequences and EAP writing development: Lexical bundles in the TOEFL iBT writing section. Journal of English for academic purposes, 12(3), 214–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stengers, H., Boers, F., Housen, A., & Eyckmans, J. (2011). Formulaic sequences and L2 oral proficiency: Does the type of target language influence the association? IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 49(4), 321–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steering Committee for the Test of Proficiency – Hua Yu. 國家華語測試推動工作委員會 (2018). 華語八千詞 [Huayu Baqianci: Chinese 8000 words]. Retrieved from [URL]
Sun, D. 孙德金. (2012). 现代书面汉语中的文言语法成分研究 [Xiandai Shumian Hanyu Zhong De Wenyan Yufa Chengfen Yanjiu: Classical Grammatical Items in Modern Written Chinese]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Wang, F., P. Yu & K. Xu 王凤兰, 于屏方, & 许琨. (2017). 基于语料库的汉语语块分类研究 [Jiyu Yuliaoku De Hanyu Yukuai Fenlei Yanjiu: A Corpus-based Study on Chinese Language Chunks Classification]. 语言与翻译 (汉文版) [Yuyan Yu Fanyi (Hanwen Ban): Language and Translation (Chinese version)], 31, 16–21.Google Scholar
Wang, Y. (2003). The Register Distinction between Spoken and Written Chinese and Chinese as a Foreign Language Instruction. Journal of Chinese Language Teachers Association, 38(3), 91–102.Google Scholar
Wang, Y. 王永娜. (2012). 书面语体“和”字动词性并列结构的构成机制 [Shumian yuti “he” zi dongcixing binglie jiegou de goucheng jizhi] The Structural Mechanism of Predicative Coordinating Verbal Phrases Using the Conjunction he in Written Chinese. 世界汉语教学 [Shijie Hanyu Jiaoxue: Teaching Chinese in the World], 21, 188–197.Google Scholar
Wen, X. 温晓虹. (2007). 教学输入与学习者的语言输出 [Jiaoxue Shuru Yu Xuexizhe De Yuyan Shuru: Instructional Input and Learner’s Output]. 世界汉语教学 [Shijie Hanyu Jiaoxue: Teaching Chinese in the World], 31, 108–119.Google Scholar
Wood, D. (2006). Uses and functions of formulaic sequences in second language speech: An exploration of the foundations of fluency. Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 13–33.Google Scholar
(2009). Effects of focused instruction of formulaic sequences on fluent expression in second language narratives: A case study. The Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 39.Google Scholar
(2010). Perspectives on formulaic language: Acquisition and communication. Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language in computer-supported communication: Theory meets reality. Language Awareness, 11(2), 114–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). Formulaic language: Pushing the boundaries. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2013). Formulaic language. Language Teaching, 46(3), 316–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xiao, R., Rayson, P., & McEnery, T. (2015). A frequency dictionary of Mandarin Chinese: Core vocabulary for learners. Milton Park: Routledge Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Z. 张正生. (2005). 书面语定义及教学问题初探. [Shumianyu Dingyi Ji Jiaoxue Wenti Chutan: On Definition of Written Language and Pedagogical Issues]. In Feng, S. & W. Hu. (Eds,), 冯胜利, & 胡文泽. 对外汉语书面语教学与研究的最新发展. [Duiwai Hanyu Shumianyu Jiaoxue Yu Yanjiu De Zuixin Fazhan: Recent Developments in Teaching and Researching Written Chinese as a Second Language.] (pp. 323-338). Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University Press.Google Scholar
Zhu, D. 朱德熙 (1999). 现代书面汉语的虚化动词和名动词 [Xiandai shumian hanyu de xuhua dongci he mingdongci: Dummy verbs and noun-verbs in modern written Chinese]. 朱德熙文集(3) [Zhu Dexi Wenji (3): Manuscripts by Zhu Dexi (3)]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Zhu, X. (2014). Study on the Teaching of Modern Literary Chinese. unpublished doctoral dissertation, Suzhou University.Google Scholar