How to Do Philosophy with Words

Reflections on the Searle-Derrida debate

| Universidad de Sevilla
HardboundAvailable
ISBN 9789027218964 | EUR 105.00 | USD 158.00
 
e-Book
ISBN 9789027266040 | EUR 105.00 | USD 158.00
 
Nowadays philosophy is characterized by such heterogeneous intellectual practices that its very unity and coherence seem endangered. What is especially disconcerting is that most authors manage to largely ignore the very existence of methodological positions radically different from their own. Fortunately, there have been exceptions, and the present volume focuses on one of them: the failed debate that took place between John Searle and Jacques Derrida.

This book thoroughly analyses that exchange, contextualizing it within the respective philosophical traditions of the two thinkers, with the general aim of turning their dispute into what it was not: a respectful, sensible and fruitful controversy. This episode is thus taken as an opportunity to reflect on the peculiar nature of philosophy as an intellectual practice, and to discuss some of its main themes: language as an instrument for communication, the intentionality of consciousness, and difference as a constitutive element of every text.
[Controversies, 12]  2017.  xviii, 225 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
Foreword
xi–xiv
Preface
xv–xviii
Introduction
1–16
Chapter 1. Austin: Language, truth and force
17–36
Chapter 2. Searle: The intentionality of the mental
37–58
Chapter 3. Derrida: Suspicion and deconstruction
59–78
Chapter 4. Deconstructing Austin
79–98
Chapter 5. The indignation of the rightful heir
99–116
Chapter 6. Deconstructing S.A.R.L.
117–138
Chapter 7. A flawed debate
139–164
Chapter 8. When philosophizing is doing
165–188
Conclusion
189–212
References
213–220
Author index
221–222
Subject index
221–225
“Jesús Navarro’s fine book stages the non-encounter of Searle and Derrida. With impartiality, care, and precision he explains the misunderstandings and ill will that made this a missed opportunity and reinforced the “analytic/continental divide” that has plagued the professional philosophical scene for decades.

The book proceeds on two levels, a first order recapitulation of theses, and then a second order reflection on the speech acts of the encounter itself, where Navarro, wonderfully, applies speech act theory to see how and why the encounter failed, as each side failed – or refused – to see the philosophical aims for which each side marshaled their theses and arguments.

In so doing it asks whether an encounter on the terrain of “philosophy” in the singular (i.e., without regard to “analytic” and “continental” varieties) would be possible. That is, is there “philosophy” or only “philosophies”? A difficult question which we can thank Navarro for posing.”
“Exploring a small dossier of texts on the legacy and significance of J.L. Austin's philosophy of language, Jesús Navarro navigates one of the most heated and sometimes over-heated debates in recent philosophical literature. Skilfully pursuing discussions which engage with both the fine details of philosophical claims and arguments and the ramifying meta-philosophical implications about what philosophical claims and arguments can and should look like in the first place, Navarro guides the reader through the extraordinary debate between Jacques Derrida and John Searle, a debate that both represents and ultimately challenges preconceived ideas about the analytic/continental division within European philosophy.”
“In revisiting a much publicised disputation between John Searle and Jacques Derrida, Jesús Navarro also examines a methodological blindspot at the heart of philosophy regarding the contested nature of what philosophy is, and/or ought to be, and the methods appropriate to those varied aims. He does so in new and interesting ways, looking at both of their work through the lens of “know-how” and its contamination with “knowledge-that”. His book is a must read for those of us interested in philosophy of philosophy, or metaphilosophy; and there is a case, I think, that that should be all of us.”
References

References

Acero Fernández, J.
1989 “Derrida vs. Austin-Searle: ¿dos tradiciones en pugna?Anthropos, Suplementos, 13, 123–126.
1991 “Después del análisis: significado, comprensión e intencionalidad”. In M. Torrevejano (ed), Filosofía analítica hoy. Encuentro de tradiciones. Santiago de Compostela: Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.
1994Filosofía y análisis del lenguaje. Madrid: Ediciones Pedagógicas.
2006 “Searle y el significado literal”. Revista de Filosofía, 31:2, 9–30.
Alfino, M.
1991 “Another Look at the Derrida-Searle Debate”. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 24:2, 143–152.
Amselek, P. and Bankowski, Z.
(eds) 1986Théorie des actes de langage, éthique et droit. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Austin, J.L.
1962aHow to Do Things with Words. J.O. Urmson (ed). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
1962b “Performatif/Constatif”. In J. Béra (ed), La Philosophie analytique. Paris: Minuit, 271–304.
1970Philosophical Papers. J.O. Urmson and G.J. Warnock (eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Avramides, A.
2005 “Intention and Convention”. In B. Hale and C. Wright (eds), A Companion to the Philosophy of Language. Malden (MA): Blackwell, 60–86.
Bach, K. and Harnish, R.M.
1984Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge (Mass): MIT Press.
Barnett, C.
1999 “Deconstructing Context: Exposing Derrida”. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 24:3, 277–293. Crossref link
Barrios Casares, M.
1999 “Retórica y crítica de la gramática teológica de la historia en Nietzsche”. Reflexión, Revista de Filosofía, 3, 115–141.
Barthes, R.
1987The Rustle of Language. R. Howard (trans.). Berkeley (CA): University of California Press.
Bearn, G.C.F.
1995 “Derrida Dry: Iterating Iterability Analitically”. Diacritics, 25:3, 3–25. Crossref link
Benveniste, É.
1971 “Analytic Philosophy and Language”. In Problems in General Linguistics. M.E. Meek (trans). Coral Gables (FL): University of Miami Press [Original work published 1963].
Bilbow, G.T.
2002 “Commissive Speech Act use in Intercultural Business Meetings”. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 40:4, 287–303. Crossref link
Blanchot, M.
1982The Space of Literature. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Bloom, H., de Man, P., Hartman, G., Miller, J.H. and Derrida, J.
1979Deconstruction and Criticism. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Boly, J.R.
1985 “Nihilism Aside: Derrida’s Debate over Intentional Models”. Philosophy and Literature, 9:2, 152–165. Crossref link
Bouveresse, J.
1999Prodiges et vertiges de l’analogie. Paris: Raisons d’Agir.
2004 “Une différence sans distinction?” In Essais IV. Pourquoi pas des philosophes? Marseille: Agone, 163–203.
Brentano, F.
1973Psychologie Vom Empirischen Standpunkt. Hamburg: Felix Meiner [Original work published 1874].
Burkhardt, A.
(ed) 1990Speech Acts, Meanings and Intentions. Critical Approaches to the Philosophy of John R. Searle. Berlin/Nueva York: de Gruyter. Crossref link
Carnap, R.
1959 “The Elimination of Metaphysics Through Logical Analysis of Language”. In A. Ayer (ed), Logical Positivism. Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 60–81 [Original work published 1931].
Cavell, S.
1976Must we Mean what we Say? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1994A Pitch of Philosophy: Autobiographical Excercises. Cambridge (Mass): Harvard University Press.
Chalmers, D.
(ed) 2002Philosophy of Mind. Classical and Contemporary Readings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chamizo-Domínguez, P.
2007Semantics and Pragmatics of False Friends. London/New York: Routledge.
Collins, R.
1998The Sociology of Philosophies. A Global Theory of Intellectual Change. Cambridge (Mass): Harvard University Press.
Culler, J.
1981 “Convention and Meaning: Derrida and Austin”. New Literary History, 13:1, 15–30. Crossref link
1982On Deconstruction. Theory and Criticism after Structuralism. Ithaca (NY): Cornell University Press.
Cusset, F.
2008French Theory: How Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze, & Co. Transformed the Intellectual Life of the United States. J. Fort (trans). Minneapolis (MN): University of Minessota Press [Original work published 2003].
Critchley, S.
1998 “Introduction”. In S. Critchley and W. Schroeder (eds), A Companion to Continental Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.
D’Agostini, F.
1997Analitici e continentali. Guida alla filosofia degli ultimi trent’anni. Milan: Raffaello Cortina.
Damasio, A.
1994Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and The Human Brain. Londres: Picador.
Dascal, M.
(ed) 1999Filosofía del lenguaje II. Pragmática. Madrid: Trotta.
1998 “La controverse en philosophie”. In J.F. Mattéi (ed), Encyclopédie Philosophique Universelle, vol. IV: Le Discours Philosophique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1583–1604.
2001 “How Rational Can a Polemic Across the Analitic-Continental «divide» be?International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 9:3, 313–139. Crossref link
2003Interpretation and Understanding. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
2007 “Tipos de polémicas y tipos de movimientos polémicos”. In R. Marafioti (ed), Parlamentos. Teoría de la argumentación y debate parlamentario. Buenos Aires: Biblos, 69–92.
Dennett, D.
1996The Intentional Stance. Cambridge (Mass): The MIT Press.
Derrida, J.
1973Speech and Phenomena, and Other Essays on Husserl’s Theory of Signs. D.B. Allison (trans). Evanston: Northwestern University Press [Original work published in 1967. La voix et le phénomène. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France].
1977a “Signature Event Context”. S. Weber and J. Mehlman (trans), Glyph, I, 172–197.
1977b “Limited Inc. a b c”. S. Weber (trans), Glyph, II, 202 and ff.
1979Spurs. Nietzsche’s Styles. B. Harlow (trans). Chicago: University of Chicago Press [Original work published in 1978. Éperons. Les styles de Nietzsche. Paris: Flammarion.
1981aPositions. A. Bass (trans). Chicago: University of Chicago Press [Original work published in 1972. Positions. Paris: Minuit].
1981bDissemination. B. Johnson (trans). Chicago: University of Chicago Press [Original work published in 1972. La Dissémination. Paris: Seuil].
1982Margins of Philosophy. A. Bass (trans). Chicago: University of Chicago Press [Original work published in 1972. Marges de la Philosophie. Paris: Minuit].
1988Limited Inc. G. Graff (ed). S. Weber and J. Mehlman (trans). Evanston (IL): Northwestern University Press [French version published in 1990. Limited Inc. E. Weber (trans). Paris: Galilée].
1989Mémoires: for Paul de Man. Revised Edition. New York: Columbia University Press [Original work published in 1988. Mémoires: pour Paul de Man. Paris: Galilée].
1990“Un penseur dans la cité, Jacques Derrida” (entretien avec Yves Roucaute). L’Evénément du Jeudi, 284, April.
1997Of Grammatology. G.C. Spivak (trans). Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press [Original work published in 1967. De la grammatologie. Paris: Minuit].
1998Monolingualism of the Other; or, the Prothesis of Origin. P. Mensah (trans). Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press [Original work published in 1996. Le monolinguisme de l’autre: ou la prothèse d’origine. Paris: Galilée].
2002aWho’s afraid of philosophy? Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press.
2002bWithout Alibi. Peggy Kamuf (trans). Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press.
Descombes, V.
1979Le même et l’autre. Quarante-cinq ans de philosophie française (1933–1978). Paris: Minuit.
Dreyfus, H.L.
1991Being in the World: A Commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time Division I. Cambridge (Mass): MIT Press.
Dummett, M.A.E.
1993Origins of Analytical Philosophy. London: Duckworth.
Engel, P.
1997La dispute. Une introduction à la philosophie analytique. Paris: Minuit.
1999 “Analytic Philosophy and Cognitive Norms”. The Monist, 82:2, 218–234. Crossref link
Ewald, H.R. and Stine, D.
1983 “Speech Act Theory and Business Communication Conventions”. Journal of Business Communication, 20:3, 13–25. Crossref link
Faigenbaum, G.
2005Conversations with John Searle. Buenos Aires: Libros en Red.
Farrell, F.B.
1988 “Iterability and Meaning: The Searle-Derrida Debate”. Metaphilosophy, 19:1, 53–64. Crossref link
Felman, S.
1980Le Scandale du corps parlant. Paris: Seuil [English translation: 2002. The Scandal of the Speaking Body. Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press].
Fish, S.E.
1976 “How to Do Things with Austin and Searle”. Modern Language Notes, 91:5, 983–1025.
1980Is There a Text in this Class? Cambridge (Mass): Harvard University Press.
1982 “With the Compliments of the Author: Reflections on Austin and Derrida”. Critical Inquiry, 8:4, 693–721. Crossref link
Flanagan, O.
2003The Problem of the Soul. New York: Basic Books.
Frank, M.
1984 “La loi du langage et l’anarchie du sens. A propos du débat Searle-Derrida”. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 151:38, fasc. 4, 396–421.
Gadamer, H.-G.
1989Truth and Method. J. Weinsheimer and D.G. Marshall (trans). New York: Continuum [Original work published in 1960].
Glendinning, S.
1998On Being with Others: Heidegger, Wittgenstein, Derrida. London: Routledge.
2001 “Inheriting «Philosophy»: The Case of Austin and Derrida Revisited”. In S. Glendinning (ed), Arguing with Derrida. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 9–33.
2006The Idea of Continental Philosophy. Edinburg: Edinburgh University Press. Crossref link
Glock, H.–J.
2008What is Analytic Philosophy? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Graff, G. Levine, G. and Smith, B.H.
1991 “The Storm Over the University’: An Exchange.” The New York Review of Books, 38:4, February 2nd.
Graff, G.
1991 “The Storm Over the University’: A Further Exchange.” The New York Review of Books, 38:9, May 16th.
Grice, H.P.
1957 “Meaning”. Philosophical Review, 66, 377–388. Crossref link
Gueroult, M.
1979Philosophie de l’histoire de la philosophie. Paris: Aubier.
Habermas, J.
1984The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. I: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston: Beacon [Original work published 1981].
1987The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. F. Lawrence (trans). Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press [Original work published 1985].
Hadreas, P.
1996 “Searle versus Derrida?Philosophiques, XXIII, 2, 317–326. Crossref link
Halion, K.
1989Deconstruction and Speech Act Theory: A Defence of the Distinction between Normal and Parasitic Speech Acts (Ph.D. Dissertation). McMaster University (Canada).
Heidegger, M.
1969 “The Onto-Theo-Logical Constitution of Metaphysics”. In Identity and Difference. J. Stambaugh (trans). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
1996Being and Time. J. Stambaugh (trans). Albany (NY): State University of New York Press [Original work published 1985].
1993.Letter on Humanism”. In Basic Writings, D.F. Krell (ed) and F.A. Capuzzi (trans). New York: Harper Collins [Original work published 1946].
Husserl, E.
1962L’Origine de la Géometrie. J. Derrida (trans. & intro.). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France [Original work published 1954].
2001Logical Investigations. J.R. Findlay (trans). London: Routledge [Original work published 1900/1].
1977Cartesian Meditations: Introduction to Phenomenology. Dorion Cairns (trans). Dordrecht: Kluwer [Original work published 1931]. Crossref link
1982Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy: First Book: General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology. F. Kersten (trans). New York: Springer [Original work published 1913]. Crossref link
International Service Marketing Institute (ISMI)
2005 “Las cartas de compromiso como estrategia de marketing”. MK: Marketing + Ventas, 198, 18–27.
Jackson, F.
1982 “Epiphenomenal Qualia”. Philosophical Quarterly, 32, 127–136. Crossref link
1986 “What Mary Didn’t Know”. Journal of Philosophy, 83, 291–295. Crossref link
Keller, H.
1967The Story of My Life. Nueva York: Scholastic Inc.
Kenaan, H.
2002 “Language, Philosophy and the Risk of Failure: Rereading the Debate Between Searle and Derrida”. Continental Philosophy Review, 35, 117–133. Crossref link
Kenny, A.
1989The Metaphysics of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Knapp, S. and Michaels, W.B.
1981 “Against Theory”. Critical Inquiry, 8, 723–742. Crossref link
1999 “Reply to John Searle”. New Literary History, 25:3, 669–675. Crossref link
Kundera, M.
1985The Unbearable Lightness of Being. M.H. Heim (trans). London: Faber and Faber.
Lamont, M.
1987 “How to Become a Dominant French Philosopher: The Case of Jacques Derrida”. The American Journal of Sociology, 93:3, 584–622. Crossref link
Lepore, E. and Van Gulick, R.
(eds) 1991John Searle and His Critics. Cambridge (Mass): Basil Blackwell.
Lévinas, E.
1979Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority. A. Lingus (trad). New York: Springer [Original work published 1961]. Crossref link
Lucy, N. and McHoul, A.
1996 “The Logical Status of Searlean Discourse”. Boundary 2, Fall, 219–241. Crossref link
Macelay, R.
2001 “An Apology for Parasitism: Revisiting an Old Debate in the Theory of Narrative Art”. Minerva – An Internet Journal of Philosophy, 5. http://​www​.minerva​.mic​.ul​.ie/​/vol5/
Mackey, L.H. and Searle, J.R.
1984 “An Exchange on Deconstruction”. The New York Review of Books, 31:1, Feb 2.
Maclean, I.
2004 “ Un dialogue de sourds? Some implications of the Austin-Searle-Derrida debate”. In I. Maclachlan (ed), Jacques Derrida. Critical Thought. Hampshire: Ashgate, 49–66.
Medina, J.
2006Speaking from Elsewhere: A New Contextualist Perspective on Meaning, Identity, and Discursive Agency. Albany: SUNY Press.
Moati, R.
2009Derrida/Searle. Déconstruction et langage ordinaire. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Moore, G.E.
1925“A Defence of Common Sense.” In Contemporary British Philosophy (2nd series). J.H. Muirhead (ed). Reprinted in G.E. Moore, Philosophical Papers (1959).
Mulligan, K.
1991 “How not to Read: Derrida on Husserl”. Topoi, 10:2, 199–208. Crossref link
2003 “Searle, Derrida and the Ends of Phenomenology”. In B. Smith (ed), John Searle, 261–286. Crossref link
Mulligan, K., Simons, P. and Smith, B.
2006 “What’s Wrong with Contemporary Philosophy?Topoi, 25:1, 63–67. Crossref link
Mundle, C.W.K.
1979A Critique of Linguistic Philosophy with Second Thoughts: An Epilogue After Ten Years. London: Glover & Blair.
Nagel, T.
1974 “What is it Like to be a Bat?Philosophical Review, 83, 435–450. Crossref link
Navarro, J.
2005 “Cómo salir de la habitación china: consciencia e intencionalidad en las otras mentesThémata, 35, 267–275.
2009 “Can we Say what we Mean? Expressibility and Background”. Pragmatics & Cognition, 17:2, 283–308. Crossref link
Nietzsche, F.
1986 “On Truth and Lying in an Extra-Moral Sense”. In The Portable Nietzsche, W. Kaufmann (trans). London: Viking Press, 42–46.
Norris, C.
1986 “Home Thoughts from Abroad: Derrida, Austin and The Oxford Connection”. Philosophy and Literature, 10:1, 1–25. Crossref link
Peñalver Gómez, P.
1979Crítica de la teoría fenomenológica del sentido. Granada: Universidad de Granada.
1993 “Insaturabilidad del contexto y anarquía del sentido”. Fragmentos de filosofía, 3, 157–166.
Polaino Navarrete, M.
2004Cometer delitos con palabras: teoría de los actos de habla y funcionalismo jurídico-penal. Madrid: Dykinson.
Potte-Bonneville, M.
1992 “La violence dans le débat philosophique: le débat Derrida-Searle”. Recherches sur la philosophie et le langage, 14, 219–248.
Prades Celma, J.L. and Sanfelix Vidarte, V.
1992Wittgenstein. Madrid: Cincel.
Preston, J.
. and Bishop, M (eds) 2002Views into the Chinese Room. New Essays on Searle and Artificial Intelligence. Oxford: Calendon Press.
Putnam, H.
1960 “Minds and Machines”. In S. Hook (ed), Dimensions of Mind. New York: New York University Press, 57–80.
1981Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
1985 “A Comparison of Something with Something Else”. New Literary History, 17:1, 61–79. Crossref link
1997 “A Half Century of Philosophy, Viewed From Within”. Daedalus, 126, 175–208.
Rabossi, E.
1999 “Actos de habla”. In M. Dascal (ed), Filosofía del lenguaje II. Pragmática, 53–72.
Recanati, F.
1987Meaning and Force. The Pragmatics of Performative Utterances. Cambridge (Mass): Cambridge University Press.
1993 “Beyond Analytic Philosophy?Stanford French Review, 17:2, 197–206.
2003 “The Limits of Expressibility”. In B. Smith (ed), John Searle, 189–213. Crossref link
Ricoeur, P.
1992Oneself as Another. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rorty, R.
(ed) 1967The Linguistic Turn. Recent Essays in Philosophical Method. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
1977 “Derrida on Language, Being and Abnormal Philosophy”. The Journal of Philosophy, 74:11, 673–681. Crossref link
1979Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
1984 “Deconstruction and Circumvention.” Critical Inquiry, 11:1, 1–23. Crossref link
1991Essays on Heidegger and Others, Philosophical Papers. Volume 2. Cambridge (Mass): Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Rosenthal, D.M.
2002 “Explaining Consciousness”. In Philosophy of Mind. Classical and Contemporary Readings, D.J. Chalmers (ed), 406–421.
Ryle, G.
2002The Concept of Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press [Original work published 1949].
Sáez Rueda, L.
1996 “Segregación o domesticación de la experiencia prerreflexiva”. Volubilis, 4, 35–53.
2001Movimientos filosóficos actuales. Madrid: Trotta.
2002El conflicto entre continentales y analíticos: dos tradiciones filosóficas. Barcelona: Crítica.
Saussure, F.De
1959Course in General Linguistics. W. Baskin (trans). New York: Columbia University Press.
Searle, J.R.. et al.
1992(On) Searle on Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Searle, J.R.
1969Speech Acts, An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge (Mass): Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
1977 “Reiterating the Differences: A Reply to Derrida”. Glyph, I, 198–208 [Published in French in Searle 1991].
1979aExpression and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
1979b “What is an Intentional State?Mind, 88:349, 74–92. Crossref link
1980 “Minds, Brains and Programs”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3:3, 417–457. Crossref link
1983Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge (Mass): Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
1983 “The Word Turned Upside Down”. The New York Review of Books, 30:16, October 27 [Published in French in 1992: Déconstruction – Le langage dans tous ses états. J.-P. Cometti (trans). Combas: Éditions de l’Éclat].
1984Minds, Brains and Science. London: British Broadcasting Corp.
1989 “How Performatives Work”. Linguistics and Philosophy, 12, 535–558. Crossref link
1990 “The Storm Over the University.” The New York Review of Books, 37:19, December 6th.
1991Pour réitérer les différences. Reponse à Derrida. J. Proust (trans). Combas: Éditions de l’Éclat.
1992The Rediscovery of the Mind. Cambridge (Mass): MIT Press.
1993a “Rationality and Realism: What Is at Stake?Daedalus, 122:4, 55–83.
1993b “Is There a Crisis in American Higher Education?The Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 46:4, 24–47. Crossref link
1994 “Literary Theory and Its Discontents”. New Literary History, 25:3, 637–667 [Extended version of 1993 “La théorie littéraire et ses bévues philosophiques”. Stanford French Review, 17, 2–3, 221–256]. Crossref link
1995The Construction of Social Reality. New York: The Free Press.
1998 “Postmodernism and Truth”. 2B: A Journal of Ideas, 13, 85–87.
2003 “Contemporary Philosophy in the United States”. In The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy. N. Bunnin and E.P. Tsui-James (eds). Oxford: Blackwell, 1–22.
2001Rationality in Action. Cambridge (Mass): MIT Press.
2003 “Contemporary Philosophy in the United States.” In N. Bunnin and E.P. Tsui-James. (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell, 1–22.
2004Mind, a Brief Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smith, B.. et al.
1992 “From Professor Barry Smith and Others”. The Times (London). May 9.
Smith, B.
(ed) 2003John Searle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Sokal, A. and Bricmont, J.
1998Intellectual Impostures. London: Profile Books.
Sokal, A.
1996a “Transgressing the Boundaries: Toward a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity”. Social Text, 46/47, 217–252. Crossref link
1996b “A Physicist Experiments with Cultural Studies”. Lingua Franca, 6:4, 62–64.
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D.
1986Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
Spivak, G.C.
1980 “Revolutions that as Yet have no Model: Derrida’s Limited Inc”. Diacritics, 10:4, 29–49. Crossref link
Strawson, P.F.
1964 “Intention and Convention in Speech Acts”. Philosophical Review, 73:4, 439–460. Crossref link
Suckale, R., Weniger, M. and Wundram, M.
2006Gothic. Cologne: Taschen.
Tiersma, P.M.
1987 “The Language of Defamation”. Texas Law Review Archives, 66:2.
Turing, A.M.
1950 “Computing Machinery and Intelligence.” Mind, 59, 433–460. Crossref link
Wittgenstein, L.
1990Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. C.K. Ogden (trans). London: Routledge [Original work published 1921].
2009Philosophical Investigations. G.E.M. Anscombe, P.M.S. Hacker and J. Schulte (eds). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell [Original work published 1953].
Yovel, J.
2000 “What is Contract Law «About»? Speech Act Theory and a Critique of «Skeletal Promises»”. Northwestern University Law Review, 94, 937–962.
Subjects

Philosophy

Philosophy
BIC Subject: HPK – Philosophy: epistemology & theory of knowledge
BISAC Subject: PHI004000 – PHILOSOPHY / Epistemology
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2016047950