Cover not available
Part of
Science and Democracy: Controversies and conflicts
Edited by Pierluigi Barrotta and Giovanni Scarafile
[Controversies 13] 2018
► pp. 7–16

Introduction

The relationship between science and democracy: Harmonic and confrontational conceptions

Article outline
  • The conception of the intrinsic harmony
  • The conception of the unavoidable conflict
  • Beyond harmonic and confrontational conceptions
  • The structure of the book
  • References
Published online: 23 May 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cvs.13.02bar
References (13)
References
Bloor, D. (1976). Knowledge and Sovial Imagery, 2nd ed. 1991), London and Boston.Google Scholar
Collins, H. and Evans, R. (2002). The Third wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertise and Experience, reprinted in E. Selinger and R. P. Crease, Eds., (2006): 39–110.Google Scholar
(2017). Why Democracies Need Science, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Grazia, A. De. (1978). The Velikovsky Affair, 1st ed. 1966, London: Sphere.Google Scholar
Koertge, N., Ed., (1998). A House Built on Sand. Exposing Postmodernist Myths about Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
, Ed., (2005). Scientific Values and Civic Virtues, Oxford: Oxford University Pres. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lacey, H. (1999). Is Science Value Free? Values and Scientific Understanding, 2nd ed. 2005, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Magee, B. (1973). Karl Popper, New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Merchant, C. (1980). The Death of Nature. Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution, San Francisco: Harper & RowGoogle Scholar
Poincaré, H. (1917). La Morale et la Science, in Dernières Pensées, 1st ed. 1913, Biblioteque de Philosophie Scientifique, E. Flammarion éditor, Parigi, Ch. viii; Eng. trans Ethics and Science, in Mathematics and Science: Last Essays, New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. (1962). The Republic of Science: Its Political and Economic Theory, Minerva, 38, 2000: 1–32.Google Scholar
Popper, K. (1966). The Open Society and Its Enemies, 5th ed., London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
(1994). The Moral Responsibility of the Scientist in Popper, The Myth of the Framework. In Defence of the Science and Rationality, London: Routledge: 121–129.Google Scholar