Chapter published in:
Science and Democracy: Controversies and conflicts
Edited by Pierluigi Barrotta and Giovanni Scarafile
[Controversies 13] 2018
► pp. 5370
References

References

Barrotta, P.
(2016) Scienza e democrazia. Verità, fatti e valori in una prospettiva pragmatista. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
Brown, M.
(2009) Science in Democracy. Expertise, Institutions, and Representation. Cambridge: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collins, H. M. and Evans, R.
(2002) The Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertise and Experience. Social Studies of Science, 32, 2, 235–296. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J.
(1927) The Public and Its Problems. In J. A. Boydston, Later Works of John Dewey, Vol. 2 1925–27 (pp.235–372). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. & Bentley, A. F.
(1949) Knowing and the Known. In J. A. Boydston, Later Works of John Dewey, Vol. 16 1949–52 (pp.1–279). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Epstein, S.
(1995) Impure Science. Aids, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Frega, R.
(2017) The Normativity of Democracy. European Journal of Political Theory, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Gronda, R.
(2017) Mezzi della ragione: pragmatismo e tecnologia. In M. Negrotti (Ed.), Uomini e macchine (pp.73–90). Roma: Armando.Google Scholar
(2015a) What Does China Mean for Pragmatism? A Philosophical Interpretation of Dewey’s Sojourn in China (1919–1921). European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy , Vol. 7 No. 2, 45–70.Google Scholar
(2015b) Normativity and Objectivity: The Semantic Nature of Objects and the Potentiality of Nature. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, Vol. 7 No. 1, 115–129.Google Scholar
Latour, B. & Woolgar, S.
(1979) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Beverly Hills: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Levi, I.
(2010) Dewey’s Logic of Inquiry. In M. Cochran (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Dewey (pp.80–100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lippmann, W.
(1922) Public Opinion. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.Google Scholar
(1925) The Phantom Public. Piscataway: Transactions Publishers.Google Scholar
Misak, C.
(2004) C. S. Peirce on Vital Matters. In C. Misak (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Peirce (pp.150–174). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, C. S.
(1992) The Cambridge Conferences Lectures of 1898. In K. L. Ketner (Ed.), Reasoning and the Logic of Things (pp.105–268). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wynne, B.
(1996) May the Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive View of the Expert-Lay Knowledge Divide. In S. Lash, B. Szerszynski & B. Wynne (Eds.), Risk, Environment & Modernity. Towards a New Ecology (pp.44–83). London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Barrotta, Pierluigi & Roberto Gronda
2020.  In Trust [Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, 54],  pp. 81 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 august 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.