Chapter published in:
Controversies in the Contemporary World
Edited by Adriano Fabris and Giovanni Scarafile
[Controversies 15] 2019
► pp. 4967
References

References

Alexander, P.
(1994) Solidity and Elasticity in the Seventeenth Century. In G. A. J. Rogers (Ed.), Locke’s Philosophy: Content and Context (pp. 143–164). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Broad, C. D.
(1975) Leibniz: An Introduction. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, I. B.
(1999) A Guide to Newton’s Principia . In I. Newton, The Principia (pp. 1–370).Google Scholar
(2002) Newton’s Concepts of Force and Mass. In I. B. Cohen and G. E. Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Newton (pp. 57–84). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Descartes, R.
(1983) Principles of Philosophy. V. R. Miller and R. P. Miller (Trans.). Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Downing, L.
(1997) Locke’s Newtonianism and Lockean Newtonianism. Perspectives on Science, 5, 285–310.Google Scholar
Dugas, R.
(1958) Mechanics in the Seventeenth Century. F. Jacquot (Trans.). Neuchâtel: Editions du Griffon.Google Scholar
Edwards, J.
(2000) Substance, Force, and the Possibility of Knowledge: On Kant’s Philosophy of Material Nature. Berkeley, CA.: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, G.
(1986) Atom and Individual in the Age of Newton: On the Genesis of the Mechanistic World View. Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hall, A. R. and Hall, M. B.
(1960) Newton’s Theory of Matter. Isis, 51, 131–144. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hall, M. B.
(1963) Matter in Seventeenth Century Science. In E. McMullin (Ed.), The Concept of Matter (pp. 344–367). Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Hankins, T. L.
(1965) Eighteenth-Century Attempts to Resolve the vis viva Controversy. Isis, 56, 281–297. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hartz, G. A.
(2007) Leibniz’s Final System: Monads, Matter and Animals, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Heimann, P. M. and McGuire, J. E.
(1971) Newtonian Forces and Lockean Powers: Concepts of Matter in Eighteenth-Century Thought. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 3, 233–306. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holden, T.
(2004) The Architecture of Matter: Galileo to Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Iltis, C.
(1973) The Leibnizian-Newtonian Debates: Natural Philosophy and Social Psychology. The British Journal for the History of Science, 6, 343–377. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jammer, M.
(1962) Concepts of Force: A Study in the Foundations of Dynamics. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Jolley, N.
(1999) Locke: His Philosophical Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W.
(1973) Philosophical Writings. G. H. R. Parkinson and M. Moris (Trans.). London: J. M. Dent.Google Scholar
McMullin, E.
(1978) Newton on Matter and Activity. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Newton, I.
(1979) Opticks. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
(1999) The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. I. B. Cohen and A. Whitman (Trans.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Polonoff, I.
(1973) Force, Cosmos, Monads and other Themes of Kant’s Early Thought. Bonn: Bouvier Verlag Herbert Grundmenn.Google Scholar
Rogers, G. A. J.
(1978) Locke’s Essay and Newton’s Principia . Journal of the History of Ideas, 39, 217–232. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schönfeld, M.
(2000) The Philosophy of the Young Kant: The Precritical Project. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scott, W. L.
(1959) The Significance of ‘Hard Bodies’ in the History of Scientific Thought. Isis, 50, 199–210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1970) The Conflict between Atomism and Conservation Theory, 1644–1860. London: Macdonald.Google Scholar
Shell, S. M.
(1996) The Embodiment of Reason: Kant on Spirit, Generation, and Community. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shimony, I.
(2010) Leibniz and the Vis Viva Controversy. In M. Dascal (Ed.), The Practice of Reason: Leibniz and His Controversies (pp. 51–73). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) What is (the) Matter – Locke, Leibniz, and the Controversy that Could not Take Place. In H. Breger, J. Herbst and S. Erdner (Eds.), Natur und Subjekt, IX. Internationaler Leibniz-Kongress (pp. 1070–1079). Hannover: Gottfried-Wilhem-Leibniz-Gesellschaft.Google Scholar
(2013) The Antinomies and Kant’s Conception of Nature. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University.Google Scholar
Westfall, R. S.
(1971) Force in Newton’s Physics: the Science of Dynamics in the Seventeenth Century. London: Macdonald.Google Scholar
Yolton, J. W.
(1983) Thinking Matter: Materialism in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
(1993) A Locke Dictionary. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar