Part of
Controversy and Confrontation: Relating controversy analysis with argumentation theoryEdited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen
[Controversies 6] 2008
► pp. 125–133
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen
[Controversies 6] 2008
► pp. 125–133
On the role of pragmatics, rhetoric and dialectic in scientific controversies
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Jakaza, Ernest & Marianna Visser
2016. ‘Subjectivity’ in newspaper reports on ‘controversial’ and ‘emotional’ debates: An appraisal and controversy analysis. Language Matters 47:1 ► pp. 3 ff. 
de Donato Rodríguez, Xavier & Jesús Zamora Bonilla
2014. Scientific Controversies and the Ethics of Arguing and Belief in the Face of Rational Disagreement. Argumentation 28:1 ► pp. 39 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2013. Research in Related Disciplines and Non-Anglophone Areas. In Handbook of Argumentation Theory, ► pp. 1 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2014. Research in Related Disciplines and Non-Anglophone Areas. In Handbook of Argumentation Theory, ► pp. 677 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.