Aspects of Leibniz’s method for religious controversy: 12. The golden rule

Lærke, Mogens

doi:10.1075/cvs.7.15lar

Part of

The Practice of Reason: Leibniz and his Controversies
Edited by Marcelo Dascal †
[Controversies 7] 2010
► pp. 297–319

12. The golden rule

Aspects of Leibniz’s method for religious controversy

Mogens Lærke

Published online: 4 March 2010

https://doi.org/10.1075/cvs.7.15lar

Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Fritz, Gerd

2018. Chapter 3. The pragmatic organization of the Hobbes vs. Bramhall controversy (1645–1658). In Historical Pragmatics of Controversies [Controversies, 14], ► pp. 96 ff.

Laerke, Mogens

2008. Apology for a Credo Maximum: On Three Basic Rules in Leibniz’s Method of Religious Controversy. In Leibniz: What Kind of Rationalist?, ► pp. 397 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.