Part of
Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary DiscourseEdited by Paul Bayley
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 10] 2004
► pp. 45–86
Edited by Paul Bayley
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 10] 2004
► pp. 45–86
Insulting as (un)parliamentary practice in the British and Swedish parliaments
A rhetorical approach
Cited by (46)
Cited by 46 other publications
Hoefel, Diego, João Paulo Capelotti & Rujuta Date
2024. Humor and conflict in the Global South. The European Journal of Humour Research 12:3 ► pp. 1 ff. 
Hunt, Alexander R & Mirko A Demasi
2024. ‘Which would be more democratic? Allowing them the opportunity to change their mind or pressing on regardless’: A discursive psychological study of arguments for and against calls for a second Brexit referendum. Discourse & Society
Jarlbrink, Johan & Fredrik Mohammadi Norén
2024. Self-mediatisation and the format of Swedish parliamentary speeches: Speech length and political slogans, 1920–2019. Nordicom Review 45:2 ► pp. 195 ff.
CONSTANTINESCU, MIHAELA-VIORICA
2023. (Im)politeness from an Emic Perspective. Illustrations from Present Day Romanian Parliamentary Debates. Studii și cercetări lingvistice 2023:2 ► pp. 216 ff.
Lastres-López, Cristina
2023. Chapter 11. Morphosyntactic and pragmatic variation in conditional constructions in English and Spanish parliamentary discourse. In Exploring Language and Society with Big Data [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 111], ► pp. 308 ff.
Öhberg, Patrik & Felix Cassel
2023. Election campaigns and the cyclical nature of emotions—How politicians engage in affective polarization. Scandinavian Political Studies 46:3 ► pp. 219 ff.
Andersson, Marta
2022. ‘So many “virologists” in this thread!’. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 32:4 ► pp. 489 ff.
Kwiatkowska, Agnieszka
2022. „Hańba w Sejmie” – zastosowanie modeli generatywnych do analizy debat parlamentarnych. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej 13:2 ► pp. 82 ff.
Brzozowska, Dorota & Władysław Chłopicki
2021. Interventions of Speakers of Polish and British Parliaments in the light of politeness theory. Intercultural Pragmatics 18:1 ► pp. 83 ff.
Shevchenko, Iryna, Donka Alexandrova & Volodymyr Gutorov
2021. Impoliteness in parliamentary discourse: a cognitive-pragmatic and sociocultural approach. Cognition, Communication, Discourse :22 ► pp. 77 ff.
Tanaka, Lidia
2021. Japanese politicians’ questions in parliament. In Questioning and Answering Practices across Contexts and Cultures [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 323], ► pp. 71 ff.
Wei, Jennifer M.
2020. Naming candidates as preemptive discursive practice: The 2016 Taiwan presidential race. Journal of Pragmatics 166 ► pp. 84 ff.
Žurauskaitė, Eglė
2020. Political TV debates: how to get more power and damage the opponent’s face?. Taikomoji kalbotyra :14 ► pp. 82 ff.
Amakali, Justina Latenda, Jairos Kangira & Beatrice Ekanjume-Ilongo
2019. Ad Hominem in Argumentation. In Argumentation and Appraisal in Parliamentary Discourse [Advances in Linguistics and Communication Studies, ], ► pp. 78 ff.
Frantzi, Katerina T., Marianthi Georgalidou & Giorgos Giakoumakis
2019. Greek Parliamentary Discourse in the Years of the Economic Crisis. In Argumentation and Appraisal in Parliamentary Discourse [Advances in Linguistics and Communication Studies, ], ► pp. 1 ff.
Nowak, Bartholomäus
2019. Chapter 7. Impoliteness in parliamentary questions. In Political Discourse in Central, Eastern and Balkan Europe [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 84], ► pp. 147 ff.
Reber, Elisabeth
2019. ‘Punch and Judy’ Politics? Embodying Challenging Courses of Action in Parliament. In Embodied Activities in Face-to-face and Mediated Settings, ► pp. 255 ff.
Verkuyten, Maykel & Wybren Nooitgedagt
2019. Parliamentary identity and the management of the far‐right: A discursive analysis of Dutch parliamentary debates. British Journal of Social Psychology 58:3 ► pp. 495 ff.
Waddle, Maurice, Peter Bull & Jan R. Böhnke
2019. “He Is Just the Nowhere Man of British Politics”: Personal Attacks in Prime Minister’s Questions. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 38:1 ► pp. 61 ff.
Bischof, Karin & Cornelia Ilie
2018. Democracy and discriminatory strategies in parliamentary discourse. Journal of Language and Politics 17:5 ► pp. 585 ff.
Domeradzka, Magdalena
2018. “It's Not the Whole Truth”. The Notions of Truth and Falsehood as Persuasive Devices in Polish and Swedish Parliamentary Talk. Folia Scandinavica Posnaniensia 25:1 ► pp. 59 ff.
Mollin, Sandra
2018. The use of face-threatening acts in the construction of in- and out-group identities in British parliamentary debates. In The Discursive Construction of Identities On- and Offline [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 78], ► pp. 205 ff.
Stopfner, Maria
Sambaraju, Rahul, Chris McVittie, Karen Goodall & Andy McKinlay
2017. “Just an Excuse People Are Just Using These Days”: Attending to and Managing Interactional Concerns in Talk on Exclusion of Immigrants. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 36:6 ► pp. 654 ff.
Tracy, Karen
2017. Facework and (Im)politeness in Political Exchanges. In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ► pp. 739 ff.
Vuković Stamatović, Milica
2017. Metaphors of parliamentary budget debates in times of crisis. Pragmatics and Society 8:2 ► pp. 281 ff.
Wiesner, Claudia, Kari Palonen & Taru Haapala
2017. Understanding Debate as Politics. In Debates, Rhetoric and Political Action, ► pp. 1 ff.
Wiesner, Claudia, Kari Palonen & Taru Haapala
2017. Research Practices and Operations in Studying Debates and Documents. In Debates, Rhetoric and Political Action, ► pp. 59 ff.
Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina
2016. Chapter 2. Intensification, identity and gender in the Andalusian Parliament. In A Gender-based Approach to Parliamentary Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 68], ► pp. 35 ff.
Ilie, Cornelia & Ariadna Ştefănescu
2016. Interdiscursive strategies of metaphor-driven rhetoric in Romanian discourses on a political crisis. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 61:1 ► pp. 139 ff.
Orkibi, Eithan
2016. The Pop‐Culturization of Political Dissent: Humor and Rhetoric as Protestainment in the French “Anti‐Sarko” Movement (2007–2012). The Journal of Popular Culture 49:3 ► pp. 541 ff.
Ryazanova-Clarke, Lara
2016. Linguistic Violence in Contemporary Russian Public Discourses. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 61:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Álvarez-Benito, Gloria & Catalina Fuentes Rodríguez
2016. Introduction. In A Gender-based Approach to Parliamentary Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 68], ► pp. 1 ff.
Ilie, Cornelia
2015. Parliamentary Discourse. In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, ► pp. 1 ff.
Ilie, Cornelia
Ilie, Cornelia
2018. Pragmatics vs rhetoric. In Pragmatics and its Interfaces [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 294], ► pp. 85 ff.
Ilie, Cornelia
2021. Discussion, dispute or controversy?. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 9:2 ► pp. 237 ff.
Bull, Peter & Pam Wells
2012. Adversarial Discourse in Prime Minister’s Questions. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 31:1 ► pp. 30 ff.
Vuković, Milica
2012. Positioning in pre-prepared and spontaneous parliamentary discourse: Choice of person in the Parliament of Montenegro. Discourse & Society 23:2 ► pp. 184 ff.
Wilson, John & Karyn Stapleton
2012. Discourse in the shadows: Discursive construction and the Northern Ireland Assembly. Discourse & Society 23:1 ► pp. 69 ff.
Robles, Jessica S.
2011. Doing disagreement in the House of Lords: ‘Talking around the issue’ as a context-appropriate argumentative strategy. Discourse & Communication 5:2 ► pp. 147 ff.
Spary, Carole
2010. Disrupting Rituals of Debate in the Indian Parliament. The Journal of Legislative Studies 16:3 ► pp. 338 ff.
Yoong, David
2010. Interactional norms in the Australian police interrogation room. Discourse & Society 21:6 ► pp. 692 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.