Mapping histories, contexts, conflicts: Parliamentary discourse when things go wrong

Carbó, Teresa

doi:10.1075/dapsac.10.09car

Part of

Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse
Edited by Paul Bayley
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 10] 2004
► pp. 301–337

Parliamentary discourse when things go wrong

Mapping histories, contexts, conflicts

Teresa Carbó | Center for Advanced Studies in Social Anthropology (CIESAS), Mexico City

Published online: 26 February 2004

https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.10.09car

Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Order by:

Inya, Onwu

2023. ‘I Cannot Overreach the Senate’: Orienting to the Macro-Context of Legislative Debates of the Nigerian Senate. Journal of Asian and African Studies ► pp. 002190962311680 ff.

Keremidchieva, Zornitsa

2014. The U.S.Congressional Recordas a technology of representation. Journal of Argumentation in Context 3:1 ► pp. 57 ff.

Stefanescu, Ariadna

2015. Analysing the rhetoric use of the epistemic marker Eu cred că (I think) in Romanian parliamentary discourse. In Persuasive Games in Political and Professional Dialogue [Dialogue Studies, 26], ► pp. 101 ff.

Vuković, Milica

2012. Positioning in pre-prepared and spontaneous parliamentary discourse: Choice of person in the Parliament of Montenegro. Discourse & Society 23:2 ► pp. 184 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.