Part of
Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary DiscourseEdited by Paul Bayley
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 10] 2004
► pp. 301–337
Edited by Paul Bayley
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 10] 2004
► pp. 301–337
Parliamentary discourse when things go wrong
Mapping histories, contexts, conflicts
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Inya, Onwu
2023. ‘I Cannot Overreach the Senate’: Orienting to the Macro-Context of Legislative Debates of the Nigerian Senate. Journal of Asian and African Studies ► pp. 002190962311680 ff. 
Stefanescu, Ariadna
2015. Analysing the rhetoric use of the epistemic marker Eu cred că (I think) in Romanian parliamentary discourse. In Persuasive Games in Political and Professional Dialogue [Dialogue Studies, 26], ► pp. 101 ff.
Keremidchieva, Zornitsa
2014. The U.S.Congressional Recordas a technology of representation. Journal of Argumentation in Context 3:1 ► pp. 57 ff.
Vuković, Milica
2012. Positioning in pre-prepared and spontaneous parliamentary discourse: Choice of person in the Parliament of Montenegro. Discourse & Society 23:2 ► pp. 184 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.