Cover not available
Part of
Social Media and Society: Integrating the digital with the social in digital discourse
Edited by Majid KhosraviNik
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 100] 2023
► pp. 127–145

Language typology as a discursive affordance in digital discourse

The case of the “camouflaged German option” online

 | University of Kansas | University of Wisconsin-Madison
With the rapid development of participatory social media, these spaces have become new arenas for producing political discourse. However, critical analyses of digital discourse that examine the importance of language typological variation for the (re)production of political discourse are relatively new. This chapter investigates linguistic creativity in non-elite political communication by combining a critical discursive approach with language typology. The analysis highlights the importance of language typology in political communication as political actors exploit the typological affordances of Polish. This chapter demonstrates how language affordances are mobilised for political reasons to (re)produce discriminatory political messages. The chapter suggests combining critical discourse analysis and language typology to reveal novel perspectives on the intersection of language and politics on the Internet.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Digital media and critical discourse studies
  • From critical discourse studies to language typology
  • The sociopolitics of Silesian identity and the “camouflaged German option”
  • Pro-Silesian and anti-Silesian discourses in online political discussions
  • Case study: The “camouflaged German option” (CGO) discourse
  • Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 14 April 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.100.07bor
References (49)
References
Androutsopoulos, Jannis. 2014. “Languaging When Contexts Collapse: Audience Design in Social Networking.” Discourse, Context and Media 4–5: 62–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baider, Fabienne, and Monika Kopytowska. 2017. “Conceptualising the Other: Online Discourses on the Current Refugee Crisis in Cyprus and in Poland.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 13 (2): 203–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. 2019. “Formatting Online Actions: #justsaying on Twitter.” International Journal of Multilingualism 16 (2): 112–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borowski, Krzysztof E.. 2020. Online Conflict Discourse, Identity, and the Social Imagination of Silesian Minority in Poland. PhD dissertation, University of Kansas. [URL]
Bou-Franch, Patricia, Nuria Lorenzo-Dus, and Pilar Garcés Conejos Blitvich. 2012. “Social Interaction in YouTube Text-Based Polylogues: A Study of Coherence.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17 (4): 501–521. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruxelles, Sylvie, and Catherine Kerbrat-Orecchioni. 2004. “Coalitions in Polylogues.” Journal of Pragmatics 36 (1): 75–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buchowski, Michał, and Katarzyna Chlewińska. 2012. “Tolerance of Cultural Diversity in Poland and Its Limitations.” San Domenico di Fiesole: European University Institute Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies. [URL]
Chadwick, Andrew. 2011. “The Political Information Cycle in a Hybrid News System: The British Prime Minister and the ‘Bullygate’ Affair.” International Journal of Press/Politics 16 (1): 3–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1989. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Galasiński, Dariusz, and Katarzyna Skowronek. 2001. “Naming the Nation: A Critical Analysis of Names in Polish Political Discourse.” Political Communication 18 (1): 51–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James J. 1977. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph. 1974. Language Typology: A Historical and Analytic Overview. The Hague, Paris: Mouton & Co. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ikegami, Yoshihiko. 1990. “Typological Discourse Analysis.” Text. Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 10 (1–2): 49–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johansson, Marjut, Sonja Kleinke, and Lotta Lehti. 2017. “The Digital Agora of Social Media: Introduction.” Discourse, Context and Media 19: 1–4. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, Rodney H. 2005. “Sites of Engagement as Sites of Attention: Time, Space and Culture in Electronic Discourse.” In Discourse in Action: Introducing Mediated Discourse Analysis, ed. by Sigrid Norris, and Rodney H. Jones, 141–154. Florence: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018. “Mediated Discourse Analysis in Language and Sexuality Research.” In Oxford Handbook of Language and Sexuality, ed. by Kira Hall, and Rusty Barrett. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
KhosraviNik, Majid. 2014. “Critical Discourse Analysis, Power, and New Media (Digital) Discourse.” In Why Discourse Matters: Negotiating Identity in the Mediatized World, ed. by Yusuf Jr. Kalyango, and Monika Weronika Kopytowska, 283–301. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2018a. “Social Media Critical Discourse Studies (SM-CDS).” In The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by John Flowerdew, and John E. Richardson, 582–596. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2018b. “Social Media Techno-Discursive Design, Affective Communication and Contemporary Politics.” Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 11 (4): 427–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
KhosraviNik, Majid, and Eleonora Esposito. 2018. “Online Hate, Digital Discourse and Critique: Exploring Digitally-Mediated Discursive Practices of Gender-Based Hostility.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 14 (1): 45–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kopytowska, Monika, Łukasz Grabowski, and Julita Woźniak. 2017. “Mobilizing against the Other: Cyberhate, Refugee Crisis and Proximization.” Contemporary Discourses of Hate and Radicalism across Space and Genres, ed. by Monika Kopytowska, 57–98. Łódź: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michał, and Per Ledin. 2017. “Uncivility on the Web.” Journal of Language and Politics 4: 566–581. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michał, and Joshua A. Tucker. 2018. “Re/Constructing Politics through Social & Online Media: Discourse, Ideologies, and Mediated Political Practices.” Journal of Language and Politics 17 (2): 141–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuć, Joanna. 2007. “Nazwiska z sufiksem -ski/-cki w XVII-wiecznych księgach kościelnych parafii mokobodzkiej [Last Names with the -ski/-cki Suffix in the 17th-c. Mokobody Parish Church Records].” Conversatoria Linguistica 1: 133–139.Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle. 2017. “Derivational Morphology.” Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marwick, Alice E., and danah boyd. 2011. “I Tweet Honestly, I Tweet Passionately: Twitter Users, Context Collapse, and the Imagined Audience.” New Media & Society 13 (1): 114–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myers-Scotton, Carol. 1997. Duelling Languages: Grammatical Structure in Codeswitching. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Myhill, John. 2003. “Typology and Discourse Analysis.” In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen, and Heidi E. Hamilton, 161–174. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Otheguy, Ricardo, Ofelia García, and Wallis Reid. 2015. “Clarifying translanguaging and deconstructing named languages: A perspective from linguistics.” Applied Linguistics Review 6 (3): 281–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Page, Ruth. 2018. Narratives Online: Shared Stories in Social Media. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poplack, Shana. 2008. “Code-Switching.” In Sociolinguistics: An International Handbook of the Science of Language and Society. Vol. 1, ed. by Ulrich Ammon, Norbert Dittmar, Klaus J. Mattheier, and Peter Trudgill, 589–596. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Prawo i Sprawiedliwość. 2011. “Raport o stanie Rzeczypospolitej [Report on the State of the Republic of Poland].” Warsaw. Retrieved from: [URL] (last accessed on 30 June 2019).
Pustułka, Agata. 2011. “Abp Skworc: Owszem, żyjemy Na Śląsku, ale jesteśmy Polakami [Archbishop Skworc: Indeed, We Live in Silesia But We’re Poles].” Dziennik Zachodni [Western Daily], 25 December 2011. Retrieved from: [URL] (last accessed on 30 June 2019).
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2016. “The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA).” In Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, edited by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 23–61. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Ritzer, George, and Nathan Jurgenson. 2010. “Production, Consumption, Prosumption: The Nature of Capitalism in the Age of the Digital ‘Prosumer.’” Journal of Consumer Culture 10 (1): 13–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, Robert A. 1993. “Polish.” In The Slavonic Languages, ed. by Bernard Comrie and Greville Corbett, 686–758. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1984. “Jewish Argument as Sociability.” Language in Society 13 (3): 311–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sieradzki, Andrzej. 2016. “Słowotwórstwo nazwisk mieszkańców wsi we wrzesińskich księgach chrztu z XVIII wieku [Word Formation of Countryside Residents’ Last Names in the 18th-c. Baptismal Records from Września].” Poznańskie Studia Polonistyczne 23 (1): 67–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
SJP. 2019. “Folksdojcz – Słownik Języka Polskiego PWN.” Słownik Języka Polskiego PWN. Accessed 1 February 2019. Retrieved from: [URL] (last accessed on 30 June 2019).
Tagg, Caroline, Philip Seargeant, and Amy Aisha Brown. 2017. Taking Offence on Social Media: Conviviality and Communication on Facebook. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah, and Christina Kakava. 1992. “Modern Greek Conversation: Disagreeing to Agree.” Journal of Modern Greek Studies 10 (1): 11–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thielemann, Nadine. 2016. “Patriotyzm genetyczny, półka kulturowa and Palikotyzacja X-a – Blends as Catchwords in Polish Political Discourse.” Zeitschrift für Slawistik 61 (1): 74–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thurlow, Crispin. 2006. “From Statistical Panic to Moral Panic: The Metadiscursive Construction and Popular Exaggeration of New Media Language in the Print Media.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11 (3): 667–701. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vaccari, Cristian. 2013. Digital Politics in Western Democracies: A Comparative Study. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wei, Li. 2018. “Translanguaging as a Practical Theory of Language.” Applied Linguistics 39 (1): 9–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1976. “Particles and Linguistic Relativity.” International Review of Slavic Linguistics 1 (2–3): 327–367.Google Scholar
. 1985. “Different Cultures, Different Languages, Different Speech Acts. Polish vs. English.” Journal of Pragmatics 9 (2–3): 145–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Woźniak, Julita, and Monika Kopytowska. 2016. “Inny” według polskiego internauty. Mowa nienawiści wobec osób odmiennych kulturowo na przykładzie komentarzy dotyczących uchodźców, umieszczanych na portalu Youtube.” Dyskursy o Kulturze. Discourses on Culture 6: 181–201.Google Scholar
Wright, Scott. 2017. “The Impact of ‘Super-Participants’ on Everyday Political Talk.” Journal of Language and Politics 2 (November 2017): 155–172.Google Scholar