Discourse, War and Terrorism
Editors
| University of Colorado
| University of Colorado
Discourse since September 11, 2001 has constrained and shaped public discussion and debate surrounding terrorism worldwide. Social actors in the Americas, Europe, Asia, the Middle East and elsewhere employ the language of the “war on terror” to explain, react to, justify and understand a broad range of political, economic and social phenomena. Discourse, War and Terrorism explores the discursive production of identities, the shaping of ideologies, and the formation of collective understandings in response to 9/11 in the United States and around the world. At issue are how enemies are defined and identified, how political leaders and citizens react, and how members of societies understand their position in the world in relation to terrorism. Contributors to this volume represent diverse sub-fields involved in the critical study of language, including perspectives from sociocultural linguistics, communication, media, cultural and political studies.
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 24] 2007. ix, 248 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
|
Table of contents
|
v–vi
|
|
Acknowledgements
|
vii–viii
|
|
Author affiliations
|
ix–x
|
|
1–18
|
|
|
19–43
|
|
|
45–65
|
|
|
67–87
|
|
|
89–103
|
|
|
105–121
|
|
|
123–142
|
|
|
143–160
|
|
|
161–183
|
|
|
185–204
|
|
|
205–222
|
|
|
223–241
|
|
|
Index
|
243–248
|
“This book serves as a testament to the growing inter-disciplinary and cross-disciplinary nature of (critical) discourse studies. In this book, the editors Hodges and Nilep have succeeded at bringing together scholars from diverse backgrounds to address an increasingly important theme, the war on terror, with its political, social, and cultural implications. Informed by theories from critical language studies, ethnography, multimodality, political science, and cultural studies, the analyses in this book all employ empirical data and apply clearly defined methodologies. This book would be an excellent addition to the shelves of those interested in the critical study of discourse, particularly those who want to understand how discourse has been used to legitimate war, subvert opposition, and obfuscate reality in the seemingly unending fight against terrorists worldwide.”
Lutfi M. Hussein, Mesa Community College, Arizona, in Discourse & Society 20(2), 2009.
Cited by
Cited by 23 other publications
No author info given
2018.
In Words of Crisis as Words of Power [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 77],
Ahmad, Jared
2016. A shifting enemy: analysing the BBC’s representations of “al-Qaeda” in the aftermath of the September 11th2001 attacks.
Critical Studies on Terrorism 9:3 ► pp. 433 ff.
Beaton-Thome, Morven
2013. What’s in a word? Your enemy combatant is my refugee
.
Journal of Language and Politics 12:3 ► pp. 378 ff.
Cap, Piotr
2015. CROSSING SYMBOLIC DISTANCES IN POLITICAL DISCOURSE SPACE.
Critical Discourse Studies 12:3 ► pp. 313 ff.
Chen, Lijuan, Danyang Zhang, Yingfei He & Guoliang Zhang
2020. Transcultural political communication from the perspective of proximization theory: A comparative analysis on the corpuses of the Sino–US trade war.
Discourse & Communication 14:4 ► pp. 341 ff.
Dahl Christensen, Tea
2015. The Figure of the Soldier: Discourses of Indisputability and Heroism in a New Danish Commemorative Practice.
Journal of War & Culture Studies 8:4 ► pp. 347 ff.
Dunmire, Patricia L.
2009. `9/11 changed everything': an intertextual analysis of the Bush Doctrine.
Discourse & Society 20:2 ► pp. 195 ff.
Dunmire, Patricia L.
2010. Knowing and Controlling the Future.
Prose Studies 32:3 ► pp. 240 ff.
Dunmire, Patricia L.
2012. Political Discourse Analysis: Exploring the Language of Politics and the Politics of Language.
Language and Linguistics Compass 6:11 ► pp. 735 ff.
El Shazly, Reham Farouk
2021. The synergy of topoi and socio-cognition in ideology construction and identity reformation: war on terror discourse.
Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression 13:1 ► pp. 62 ff.
Gibson, Stephen
2011. Social Psychology, War and Peace: Towards a Critical Discursive Peace Psychology.
Social and Personality Psychology Compass 5:5 ► pp. 239 ff.
Hughes, David A.
2013. Liberal Warfare: A Crusade Twice Removed.
International Studies Review 15:3 ► pp. 351 ff.
Keel, Sara & Lorenza Mondada
2017. The micro-politics of sequential organization.
Journal of Language and Politics 16:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Malito, Debora Valentina
2015. Building terror while fighting enemies: how the Global War on Terror deepened the crisis in Somalia.
Third World Quarterly 36:10 ► pp. 1866 ff.
Markaki, Vassiliki
2011. Book review: Samia Bazzi, Arab News and Conflict: A Multi-Disciplinary Discourse Study (Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture series, Volume 34). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 2009. xiv + 224 pp., 115 (pbk).
Discourse Studies 13:1 ► pp. 122 ff.
McElhinny, Bonnie
2010. The Audacity of Affect: Gender, Race, and History in Linguistic Accounts of Legitimacy and Belonging.
Annual Review of Anthropology 39:1 ► pp. 309 ff.
Mirghani, Suzannah
2011. The War on Piracy: Analyzing the Discursive Battles of Corporate and Government-Sponsored Anti-Piracy Media Campaigns.
Critical Studies in Media Communication 28:2 ► pp. 113 ff.
Moradi-Joz, Rasool, Saeed Ketabi & Mansoor Tavakoli
2019. On conductive argumentation.
Journal of Language and Politics 18:1 ► pp. 83 ff.
Rasmussen, Joel
2015. ‘Should each of us take over the role as watcher?’ Attitudes on Twitter towards the 2014 Norwegian terror alert.
Journal of Multicultural Discourses 10:2 ► pp. 197 ff.
Sowińska, Agnieszka
2013. A critical discourse approach to the analysis of values in political discourse: The example of freedom in President Bush’s State of the Union addresses (2001–2008).
Discourse & Society 24:6 ► pp. 792 ff.
Tan, Neslie Carol
2017. Book review: Antoon De Rycker and Zuraidah Mohd Don (eds), Discourse and Crisis: Critical Perspectives.
Discourse & Society 28:2 ► pp. 227 ff.
Tracy, Karen, Susana Martinez-Guillem, Jessica S. Robles & Kimberly E. Casteline
2011. Critical Discourse Analysis and (U.S.) Communication Scholarship Recovering Old Connections, Envisioning New Ones.
Annals of the International Communication Association 35:1 ► pp. 241 ff.
Wodak, Ruth
2007. Preface: New and different perspectives on Language and/in Politics.
Journal of Language and Politics 6:2 ► pp. 143 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 july 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects & Metadata
Communication Studies
BIC Subject: CFG – Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
BISAC Subject: LAN015000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Rhetoric