Article published in:The Social Construction of SARS: Studies of a health communication crisis
Edited by John H. Powers and Xiaosui Xiao
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 30] 2008
► pp. 125–142
7. SARS discourse as an anti-SARS ideology: The case of Beijing
This study examines a series of SARS case reports produced by the News Office of China’s Health Ministry between 21 April and 20 May 2003. The study first examines the change of “stages” in the generic structure of the 30 case reports, and then relates these changes to the way in which the News Office selectively included and excluded SARS case information. It is observed that, by adding and deleting stages in the case reports, the News Office attached more prominence to information that went with the interests and beliefs of its own group and downgraded information that was inconsistent with their interests and desires. Preference for some information and ignoring of other information are seen as a way of representing the anti-SARS social practice and constituting the group’s particular anti-SARS ideology.
Published online: 12 November 2008
Cited by 1 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 may 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.