Projecting the Future through Political Discourse
The case of the Bush doctrine
| Kent State University
This monograph examines the rhetorical nature and function of representations of the future in political discourse, focusing on political actors’ use of hegemonic images of future “reality” to achieve their political goals. It argues that a key ideological dimension of political rhetoric lies in politicians’ use of projections of the future to legitimate policies and actions. This argument is grounded in systemic-functional and critical discourse analyses of the “Bush Doctrine,” the U.S. policy response to the September 11 terrorist attacks which sanctioned a “preemptive” military posture. By focusing on the discursive construction of the future, this project addresses a lacunae in critical discourse studies and calls attention to the crucial role that the discourse and practice of “futurology” has played in post-Cold War politics and society. It will be of value to scholars interested in the discourses of politics, the “war on terror,” U.S. national security, and futurology.
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 41] 2011. xi, 218 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
|
Acknowledgements
|
xi–xii
|
|
Chapter 1. Introduction: Why study discourse about the future?
|
1–26
|
|
Chapter 2. The Politics, rhetoric, and ideology of projecting the future
|
27–54
|
|
Chapter 3. Securing the future for the “American Peace” Preventive war as national security strategy
|
55–88
|
|
Chapter 4. Prefiguring the future: President Bush’s case for war against Iraq
|
89–124
|
|
Chapter 5. Transforming national security, legitimating preventive war
|
125–146
|
|
Chapter 6. Preserving “Pax Americana” Back to the future of the Bush Doctrine
|
147–164
|
|
Chapter 7. “Clear and present danger” Building the “World of Tomorrow” in a new security era
|
165–188
|
|
Chapter 8. Conclusion
|
189–198
|
|
Works cited
|
199–214
|
|
Index
|
215–218
|
Cited by
Cited by 44 other publications
No author info given
2012. PUBLICATIONS RECEIVED.
Language in Society 41:1 ► pp. 155 ff. 
No author info given
2018.
In Words of Crisis as Words of Power [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 77],
Bjork, Collin & Frida Buhre
2021. Resisting Temporal Regimes, Imagining Just Temporalities.
Rhetoric Society Quarterly 51:3 ► pp. 177 ff.
Cap, Piotr
2015.
In The Dynamics of Political Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 259],
► pp. 59 ff.
Cap, Piotr
2015. CROSSING SYMBOLIC DISTANCES IN POLITICAL DISCOURSE SPACE.
Critical Discourse Studies 12:3 ► pp. 313 ff.
Cap, Piotr
2015. Follow-ups in the US anti-terrorist discourse: Proposal for a macro-discursive approach to monologic follow-up sequences.
Discourse & Society 26:5 ► pp. 543 ff.
Cap, Piotr
2017.
In The Language of Fear,
► pp. 15 ff.
Cap, Piotr
2017.
In The Language of Fear,
► pp. 29 ff.
Cap, Piotr
2017.
In The Language of Fear,
► pp. 41 ff.
Cap, Piotr
2018. From ‘cultural unbelonging’ to ‘terrorist risk’: communicating threat in the Polish anti-immigration discourse.
Critical Discourse Studies 15:3 ► pp. 285 ff.
Cap, Piotr
2018. ‘We don’t want any immigrants or terrorists here’: The linguistic manufacturing of xenophobia in the post-2015 Poland.
Discourse & Society 29:4 ► pp. 380 ff.
Cap, Piotr
2019.
In Migration and Media [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 81],
► pp. 115 ff.
Cap, Piotr
2019. Discourse studies: Between social constructionism and linguistics. A critical overview.
Topics in Linguistics 20:2 ► pp. 1 ff.
Cap, Piotr
2021. Alternative futures in political discourse.
Discourse & Society 32:3 ► pp. 328 ff.
Cap, Piotr
2021. On the development of the social-linguistic nexus in discourse research.
Pragmatics and Society 12:2 ► pp. 309 ff.
Duncan, Philip T.
2014. REMEMBERING THE FUTURE.
Critical Discourse Studies 11:4 ► pp. 416 ff.
Dunmire, Patricia L.
2012. Political Discourse Analysis: Exploring the Language of Politics and the Politics of Language.
Language and Linguistics Compass 6:11 ► pp. 735 ff.
Ferrari, Federica
2018. In lack of ‘Will’? Strategic ‘Future-ness’ and Barack Obama’s experiment: From intention negotiation to will creation and political action in Barack Obama’s e-mail campaigning.
Time & Society 27:2 ► pp. 195 ff.
Forstorp, Per-Anders & Ulf Mellström
2018.
In Higher Education, Globalization and Eduscapes,
► pp. 17 ff.
Forstorp, Per-Anders & Ulf Mellström
2018.
In Higher Education, Globalization and Eduscapes,
► pp. 157 ff.
Forstorp, Per-Anders & Ulf Mellström
2018.
In Higher Education, Globalization and Eduscapes,
► pp. 195 ff.
Forstorp, Per-Anders & Ulf Mellström
2018.
In Higher Education, Globalization and Eduscapes,
► pp. 243 ff.
Hart, Christopher
2015. VIEWPOINT IN LINGUISTIC DISCOURSE.
Critical Discourse Studies 12:3 ► pp. 238 ff.
Hodges, Adam
2015.
In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis,
► pp. 42 ff.
Hodges, Adam
2015.
In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction,
► pp. 1 ff.
Hunter, Duncan & Malcolm N MacDonald
2017. Arguments for exception in US security discourse.
Discourse & Society 28:5 ► pp. 493 ff.
Kaal, Bertie
2015. HOW ‘REAL’ ARE TIME AND SPACE IN POLITICALLY MOTIVATED WORLDVIEWS?.
Critical Discourse Studies 12:3 ► pp. 330 ff.
Kaal, Bertie
2021.
In The Pragmatics of Adaptability [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 319],
► pp. 75 ff.
MacDonald, Malcolm N. & Duncan Hunter
2019.
In The Discourse of Security,
► pp. 1 ff.
MacDonald, Malcolm N. & Duncan Hunter
2019.
In The Discourse of Security,
► pp. 57 ff.
MacDonald, Malcolm N. & Duncan Hunter
2019.
In The Discourse of Security,
► pp. 85 ff.
MacDonald, Malcolm N. & Duncan Hunter
2019.
In The Discourse of Security,
► pp. 197 ff.
MacDonald, Malcolm N. & Duncan Hunter
2019.
In The Discourse of Security,
► pp. 263 ff.
MacDonald, Malcolm N. & Duncan Hunter
2019.
In The Discourse of Security,
► pp. 291 ff.
McIntosh, Janet
2021. Language and the Military: Necropolitical Legitimation, Embodied Semiotics, and Ineffable Suffering.
Annual Review of Anthropology 50:1 ► pp. 241 ff.
McKeown, Jamie
2018. A corpus-based investigation of techno-optimism and propositional certainty in the National Intelligence Council’s ‘Future Global Trends Reports’ (2010–2035).
Discourse & Communication 12:1 ► pp. 39 ff.
Nilsson, Bo & Anna Sofia Lundgren
2018. ‘For a living countryside’: Political rhetoric about Swedish rural areas.
European Urban and Regional Studies 25:1 ► pp. 72 ff.
Oddo, John
2013. Discourse-Based Methods Across Texts and Semiotic Modes.
Written Communication 30:3 ► pp. 236 ff.
Oddo, John
2013. Precontextualization and the rhetoric of futurity: Foretelling Colin Powell’s UN address on NBC News.
Discourse & Communication 7:1 ► pp. 25 ff.
Schubert, Christoph
2014. Cognitive categorization and prototypicality as persuasive strategies.
Journal of Language and Politics 13:2 ► pp. 313 ff.
Selchow, Sabine
2017. Resilience and resilient in Obama’s National Security Strategy 2010: Enter two ‘political keywords’.
Politics 37:1 ► pp. 36 ff.
Singh, Ganeshwari, Simrit Kahlon & Vishwa Bandhu Singh Chandel
2019. Political Discourse and the Planned City: Nehru’s Projection and Appropriation of Chandigarh, the Capital of Punjab.
Annals of the American Association of Geographers 109:4 ► pp. 1226 ff.
Szpunar, Piotr M
2021. Promnesic futures: Technology, climate, déjà vu.
Memory Studies 14:4 ► pp. 747 ff.
Săftoiu, Răzvan
2014. Review of Cap (2013): Proximization. The Pragmatics of Symbolic Distance Crossing.
Language and Dialogue 4:3 ► pp. 497 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects & Metadata
BIC Subject: CFG – Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General