Part of
From Text to Political Positions: Text analysis across disciplines
Edited by Bertie Kaal, Isa Maks and Annemarie van Elfrinkhof
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 55] 2014
► pp. 171188
References (30)
References
Chouliaraki, L. and N. Fairclough. 1999. Discourse in Late Modernity. Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. 1992. Discourse and Social Change, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. CDA as a method in social scientific research. In: R. Wodak and M. Meyer (eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, London: Sage, pp. 121–139.Google Scholar
. 2003. Analysing Discourse. Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2006. Language and Globalization. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1984 [1982]. The order of discourse. In M. Shapiro (ed.), Language and Politics, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 108–138.Google Scholar
Gramsci, A. 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. 1994. Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd ed. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Howarth, D. 2000. Discourse. Ballmoor: Open University.Google Scholar
. 2004. Hegemony, subjectivity, democracy. In S. Critchley, O. Marchart, (Eds), Laclau. A Critical Reader. Oxoford: Routledge, pp. 256–276.Google Scholar
Jessop, B. 2002. The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Laclau, E. 1990. New Reflections on the Revolution of our Time. London, New York: Verso.Google Scholar
. 1996/2007. Emancipation(s). London: Verso.Google Scholar
2005. On Populist Reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Laclau, E. and C. Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Towards a Radical Democratic Politics, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Montesano Montessori, N. 2009. A Discursive Analysis of a Struggle for Hegemony in Mexico. The Zapatista Movement versus President Salinas de Gortari. Saarbrücken: VDM.Google Scholar
. 2011. The design of a theoretical, methodological, analytical framework to analyse hegemony in discourse. Critical Discourse Studies 8(3), pp. 169–182. DOI logo Google Scholar
Montesano Montessori, N., H. Schuman and R. De Lange. 2012. Kritische Discoursanalyse. De macht en kracht van taal en tekst. Brussels: Academic and Scientific Publishers.Google Scholar
Norval, A.J. 2000. Trajectories of future research in discourse Theory. In D. Howarth, A.J. ­Norval and Y. Stavrakakis (eds.), Discourse Theory and Political Analysis: Identities, Hegemonies and Social Change. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 219–223.Google Scholar
Olesen, T. 2005. International Zapatismo. The Construction of Solidarity in the Age Of Globalization. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Patterson, W. (Ed.). 2002. Strategic Narrative: New perspectives on personal and cultural narratives, Lexington, M. A.: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Phillips, L., and M.W. Jørgensen, 2002. Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Reisigl, M., and R. Wodak. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination. Rhetorics of racism and anti-Semitism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. 1991. Life in quest of narrative. In D. Wood (Ed.), On Paul Ricoeur: Narrative and Interpretation, London: Routledge, pp. 20–33.Google Scholar
Somers, M.R. 1994. The narrative constitution of identity: A relational and network approach. Theory and Society 23, pp. 605–649. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Titscher, S., M. Meyer, R. Wodak and E. Vetter. 2000. Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Torfing, J. 1999. New Theories on Discourse. Laclau, Mouffe and Žižek. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Van Eemeren, F.H. and R. Grootendorst, 1992. Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies. A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Werth, P. 1999. Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse, London: Longman.Google Scholar
Wodak, R., R. de Cillia, M Reisigl, and K. Liebhart. 1999. The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Romano, Manuela & M Dolores Porto
2018. ‘The tide, change, nobody can stop it’: Metaphor for social action. Discourse & Society 29:6  pp. 655 ff. DOI logo
Calzada Pérez, Maria
2017. Five turns of the screw. Journal of Language and Politics 16:3  pp. 412 ff. DOI logo
Calzada-Pérez, María
2017. Researching the European Parliament with Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 30:2  pp. 465 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.