The Potential of Narrative Strategies in the Discursive Construction of Hegemonic Positions and Social Change
This chapter illustrates ways in which narrative strategies contribute to the construction of hegemonic processes of social change. Narratives have transformational power because they shape new imaginaries about social life, help to legitimate them and create consensus. It is argued that effective hegemony constitutes power over social reality and will be generally accepted as a ‘matter of course’. This chapter is based on a study of the struggle for hegemony between former Mexican President Gortari and the Zapatista movement and integrates a Gramscian view on hegemony with discourse theory (Laclau and Mouffe 1985). The study contributes to the development of discourse theory on hegemony, using the concept of three levels of abstraction, or ‘orders of discourse’, found in Critical Discourse Analysis (Fairclough, 2001, 2003); and a discourse-historical approach (Reisigl and Wodak 2001). A comparison is made with Eleveld’s study of storylines (this volume) and Filardo Llamas’ text worlds, leading to the presentation of criteria for qualitative research and some ideas for further research.
References
Chouliaraki, L. and N. Fairclough
1999 Discourse in Late Modernity. Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fairclough, N
1992 Discourse and Social Change, Cambridge: Polity Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fairclough, N
2001 CDA as a method in social scientific research. In:
R. Wodak and
M. Meyer (eds.),
Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, London: Sage, pp. 121–139.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fairclough, N
2003 Analysing Discourse. Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fairclough, N
2006 Language and Globalization. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Foucault, M
1984 [1982]
The order of discourse. In
M. Shapiro (ed.),
Language and Politics, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 108–138.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gramsci, A
1971 Selections from the Prison Notebooks. New York: International Publishers.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, M.A.K
1994 Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd ed. London: Edward Arnold.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Howarth, D
2000 Discourse. Ballmoor: Open University.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Howarth, D
2004 Hegemony, subjectivity, democracy. In
S. Critchley,
O. Marchart, (Eds),
Laclau. A Critical Reader. Oxoford: Routledge, pp. 256–276.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jessop, B
2002 The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge: Polity Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Laclau, E
1990 New Reflections on the Revolution of our Time. London, New York: Verso.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Laclau, E
1996/2007
Emancipation(s). London: Verso.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Laclau, E
2005 On Populist Reason. London: Verso.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Laclau, E. and C. Mouffe
1985 Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Towards a Radical Democratic Politics, London: Verso.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Montesano Montessori, N
2009 A Discursive Analysis of a Struggle for Hegemony in Mexico. The Zapatista Movement versus President Salinas de Gortari. Saarbrücken: VDM.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Montesano Montessori, N
2011 The design of a theoretical, methodological, analytical framework to analyse hegemony in discourse.
Critical Discourse Studies 8(3), pp. 169–182.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Montesano Montessori, N., H. Schuman and R. De Lange
2012 Kritische Discoursanalyse. De macht en kracht van taal en tekst. Brussels: Academic and Scientific Publishers.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Norval, A.J
2000 Trajectories of future research in discourse Theory. In
D. Howarth,
A.J. Norval and
Y. Stavrakakis (eds.),
Discourse Theory and Political Analysis: Identities, Hegemonies and Social Change. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 219–223.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Olesen, T
2005 International Zapatismo. The Construction of Solidarity in the Age Of Globalization. London: Zed Books.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Patterson, W
(Ed.) 2002 Strategic Narrative: New perspectives on personal and cultural narratives, Lexington, M. A.: Lexington Books.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Phillips, L., and M.W. Jørgensen
2002 Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London: Sage.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reisigl, M., and R. Wodak
2001 Discourse and Discrimination. Rhetorics of racism and anti-Semitism. London: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ricoeur, P
1991 Life in quest of narrative. In
D. Wood (Ed.),
On Paul Ricoeur: Narrative and Interpretation, London: Routledge, pp. 20–33.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Somers, M.R
1994 The narrative constitution of identity: A relational and network approach.
Theory and Society 23, pp. 605–649.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Titscher, S., M. Meyer, R. Wodak and E. Vetter
2000 Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Torfing, J
1999 New Theories on Discourse. Laclau, Mouffe and Žižek. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Eemeren, F.H. and R. Grootendorst
1992 Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies. A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Werth, P
1999 Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse, London: Longman.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wodak, R., R. de Cillia, M Reisigl, and K. Liebhart
1999 The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Romano, Manuela & M Dolores Porto
2018.
‘The tide, change, nobody can stop it’: Metaphor for social action.
Discourse & Society 29:6
► pp. 655 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.