Article published in:
From Text to Political Positions: Text analysis across disciplines
Edited by Bertie Kaal, Isa Maks and Annemarie van Elfrinkhof
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 55] 2014
► pp. 171188
References

References

Chouliaraki, L. and N. Fairclough
1999Discourse in Late Modernity. Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N.
1992Discourse and Social Change, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
2001CDA as a method in social scientific research. In: R. Wodak and M. Meyer (eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, London: Sage, pp. 121–139.Google Scholar
2003Analysing Discourse. Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2006Language and Globalization. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Foucault, M.
1984 [1982] The order of discourse. In M. Shapiro (ed.), Language and Politics, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 108–138.Google Scholar
Gramsci, A.
1971Selections from the Prison Notebooks. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K.
1994Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd ed. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Howarth, D.
2000Discourse. Ballmoor: Open University.Google Scholar
2004Hegemony, subjectivity, democracy. In S. Critchley, O. Marchart, (Eds), Laclau. A Critical Reader. Oxoford: Routledge, pp. 256–276.Google Scholar
Jessop, B.
2002The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Laclau, E.
1990New Reflections on the Revolution of our Time. London, New York: Verso.Google Scholar
1996/2007 Emancipation(s). London: Verso.Google Scholar
2005On Populist Reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Laclau, E. and C. Mouffe
1985Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Towards a Radical Democratic Politics, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Montesano Montessori, N.
2009A Discursive Analysis of a Struggle for Hegemony in Mexico. The Zapatista Movement versus President Salinas de Gortari. Saarbrücken: VDM.Google Scholar
2011The design of a theoretical, methodological, analytical framework to analyse hegemony in discourse. Critical Discourse Studies 8(3), pp. 169–182. Crossref Google Scholar
Montesano Montessori, N., H. Schuman and R. De Lange
2012Kritische Discoursanalyse. De macht en kracht van taal en tekst. Brussels: Academic and Scientific Publishers.Google Scholar
Norval, A.J.
2000Trajectories of future research in discourse Theory. In D. Howarth, A.J. ­Norval and Y. Stavrakakis (eds.), Discourse Theory and Political Analysis: Identities, Hegemonies and Social Change. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 219–223.Google Scholar
Olesen, T.
2005International Zapatismo. The Construction of Solidarity in the Age Of Globalization. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Patterson, W.
(Ed.) 2002Strategic Narrative: New perspectives on personal and cultural narratives, Lexington, M. A.: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Phillips, L., and M.W. Jørgensen
2002Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Reisigl, M., and R. Wodak
2001Discourse and Discrimination. Rhetorics of racism and anti-Semitism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P.
1991Life in quest of narrative. In D. Wood (Ed.), On Paul Ricoeur: Narrative and Interpretation, London: Routledge, pp. 20–33.Google Scholar
Somers, M.R.
1994The narrative constitution of identity: A relational and network approach. Theory and Society 23, pp. 605–649. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Titscher, S., M. Meyer, R. Wodak and E. Vetter
2000Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Torfing, J.
1999New Theories on Discourse. Laclau, Mouffe and Žižek. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Van Eemeren, F.H. and R. Grootendorst
1992Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies. A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Werth, P.
1999Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse, London: Longman.Google Scholar
Wodak, R., R. de Cillia, M Reisigl, and K. Liebhart
1999The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Calzada Perez, Maria
2017. Five turns of the screw. Journal of Language and Politics 16:3  pp. 412 ff. Crossref logo
Calzada Pérez, Maria
2017. Researching the European Parliament with Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 30:2  pp. 465 ff. Crossref logo
Romano, Manuela & M Dolores Porto
2018. ‘The tide, change, nobody can stop it’: Metaphor for social action. Discourse & Society 29:6  pp. 655 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 september 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.