Cover not available
Part of
From Text to Political Positions: Text analysis across disciplines
Edited by Bertie Kaal, Isa Maks and Annemarie van Elfrinkhof
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 55] 2014
► pp. 171–188

The Potential of Narrative Strategies in the Discursive Construction of Hegemonic Positions and Social Change

ORCID logo

This chapter illustrates ways in which narrative strategies contribute to the construction of hegemonic processes of social change. Narratives have transformational power because they shape new imaginaries about social life, help to legitimate them and create consensus. It is argued that effective hegemony constitutes power over social reality and will be generally accepted as a ‘matter of course’. This chapter is based on a study of the struggle for hegemony between former Mexican President Gortari and the Zapatista movement and integrates a Gramscian view on hegemony with discourse theory (Laclau and Mouffe 1985). The study contributes to the development of discourse theory on hegemony, using the concept of three levels of abstraction, or ‘orders of discourse’, found in Critical Discourse Analysis (Fairclough, 2001, 2003); and a discourse-historical approach (Reisigl and Wodak 2001). A comparison is made with Eleveld’s study of storylines (this volume) and Filardo Llamas’ text worlds, leading to the presentation of criteria for qualitative research and some ideas for further research.

Published online: 7 May 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.55.08mon
References
Chouliaraki, L. and N. Fairclough
1999 Discourse in Late Modernity. Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N
1992 Discourse and Social Change, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
2001 CDA as a method in social scientific research. In: R. Wodak and M. Meyer (eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, London: Sage, pp. 121–139.Google Scholar
2003 Analysing Discourse. Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2006 Language and Globalization. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Foucault, M
1984 [1982] The order of discourse. In M. Shapiro (ed.), Language and Politics, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 108–138.Google Scholar
Gramsci, A
1971 Selections from the Prison Notebooks. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K
1994 Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd ed. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Howarth, D
2000 Discourse. Ballmoor: Open University.Google Scholar
2004 Hegemony, subjectivity, democracy. In S. Critchley, O. Marchart, (Eds), Laclau. A Critical Reader. Oxoford: Routledge, pp. 256–276.Google Scholar
Jessop, B
2002 The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Laclau, E
1990 New Reflections on the Revolution of our Time. London, New York: Verso.Google Scholar
1996/2007 Emancipation(s). London: Verso.Google Scholar
2005 On Populist Reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Laclau, E. and C. Mouffe
1985 Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Towards a Radical Democratic Politics, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Montesano Montessori, N
2009 A Discursive Analysis of a Struggle for Hegemony in Mexico. The Zapatista Movement versus President Salinas de Gortari. Saarbrücken: VDM.Google Scholar
2011 The design of a theoretical, methodological, analytical framework to analyse hegemony in discourse. Critical Discourse Studies 8(3), pp. 169–182. DOI logo Google Scholar
Montesano Montessori, N., H. Schuman and R. De Lange
2012 Kritische Discoursanalyse. De macht en kracht van taal en tekst. Brussels: Academic and Scientific Publishers.Google Scholar
Norval, A.J
2000 Trajectories of future research in discourse Theory. In D. Howarth, A.J. ­Norval and Y. Stavrakakis (eds.), Discourse Theory and Political Analysis: Identities, Hegemonies and Social Change. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 219–223.Google Scholar
Olesen, T
2005 International Zapatismo. The Construction of Solidarity in the Age Of Globalization. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Patterson, W
(Ed.) 2002 Strategic Narrative: New perspectives on personal and cultural narratives, Lexington, M. A.: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Phillips, L., and M.W. Jørgensen
2002 Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Reisigl, M., and R. Wodak
2001 Discourse and Discrimination. Rhetorics of racism and anti-Semitism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P
1991 Life in quest of narrative. In D. Wood (Ed.), On Paul Ricoeur: Narrative and Interpretation, London: Routledge, pp. 20–33.Google Scholar
Somers, M.R
1994 The narrative constitution of identity: A relational and network approach. Theory and Society 23, pp. 605–649. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Titscher, S., M. Meyer, R. Wodak and E. Vetter
2000 Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Torfing, J
1999 New Theories on Discourse. Laclau, Mouffe and Žižek. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Van Eemeren, F.H. and R. Grootendorst
1992 Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies. A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Werth, P
1999 Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse, London: Longman.Google Scholar
Wodak, R., R. de Cillia, M Reisigl, and K. Liebhart
1999 The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar