Between Union and a United Ireland
Shifting Positions in Northern Ireland’s Post-Agreement Political Discourse
This chapter concerns the double objective of political discourse: spreading ideological beliefs and allowing political progress. Political discourse can be effective by means of carefully chosen linguistic elements (pronouns, lexical referents, metaphors). If successfully constructed, the discourse can live on for many years, as we see in the Northern Irish Agreement of 1998 that is still resounding in current debates. Its ambiguity and vagueness allowed for different interpretations, in such a way that the support, or rejection, of the agreement could be legitimised, depending on the ideological beliefs of the community. An analysis of selected instances of its discourse over time shows how the ideological and political positions that are discursively constructed in such a way that they are close to both the producers and the interpreters of the document, but also to the political process of production and interpretation in which the texts are embedded. Text World Theory and Cognitive Linguistics are the tools for analysing the different types of mental representations that are recalled by each instance of discourse.
References
Alonso, R
2001 Irlanda del Norte. Una Historia de Guerra y la Búsqueda de la Paz. Madrid: Editorial Complutense.
Aughey, A
2002 The art and effect of political lying in Northern Ireland.
Irish Political Studies 17(2), pp. 1–16.
Berger, P. and T. Luckman
1966 The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Penguin.
Charteris-Black, J
2005 Politicians and Rhetoric. The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Chilton, P.A
2004 Analysing Political Discourse. Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
Fairclough, N
1989 Language and Power. London: Longman.
Fauconnier, G. and M. Turner
2002 The Way We Think. Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.
Filardo-Llamas, L
2008 A comparative study of the discursive legitimation of the agreement by the four main Northern Irish political parties throughout time.
Ethnopolitics 7(1), pp. 21–42.
Filardo-Llamas, L
2009 Proposal for the analysis of the legitimatory function of political discourse in the Northern Irish context. In
I. Iñigo-Mora et al. . (eds.),
Analysing Political Discourse Strategies. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 135–152
Filardo-Llamas, L
2010 Discourse worlds in Northern Ireland: The Legitimisation of the 1998 Agreement. In
K. Hayward and
C. O’Donnell (eds.),
Debating Conflict and Peace: Dissonant discourses in Northern Ireland. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 62–76
Gavins, J
2007 Text World Theory. An Introduction. Edinburg: Edinburgh University Press.
Halliday, M.A.K
2004 An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3
rd edition. (Revised by Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen). London: Edward Arnold.
Hayward, K
2010 The role of political discourse in conflict transformation: Evidence from Northern Ireland. In
K. Hayward and
C. O’Donnell (Eds.),
Debating Conflict and Peace: Dissonant Discourses in Northern Ireland. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 1–15.
Laclau, E
2007 [1996]
Emancipation(s), London: Verso.
Langacker, R
2008 Cognitive Grammar. A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Van Dijk, T.A
1998 Ideology. A Multidisciplinary Introduction. London: Sage
Van Leeuwen, T. and R. Wodak
1999 Legitimizing immigration control: A Discourse-Historical Approach.
Discourse Studies 1(1), pp. 83–118.
Wenden, A. L. and C. Schäffner
1995 Introduction. In
C. Schäffner and A. L.
Wenden (Eds.)
Language and Peace. London: Routledge, pp. xv–xxv.
Werth, P
1999 Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.