Cover not available
Part of
From Text to Political Positions: Text analysis across disciplines
Edited by Bertie Kaal, Isa Maks and Annemarie van Elfrinkhof
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 55] 2014
► pp. 207–224

Between Union and a United Ireland

Shifting Positions in Northern Ireland’s Post-Agreement Political Discourse

ORCID logo
This chapter concerns the double objective of political discourse: spreading ideological beliefs and allowing political progress. Political discourse can be effective by means of carefully chosen linguistic elements (pronouns, lexical referents, metaphors). If successfully constructed, the discourse can live on for many years, as we see in the Northern Irish Agreement of 1998 that is still resounding in current debates. Its ambiguity and vagueness allowed for different interpretations, in such a way that the support, or rejection, of the agreement could be legitimised, depending on the ideological beliefs of the community. An analysis of selected instances of its discourse over time shows how the ideological and political positions that are discursively constructed in such a way that they are close to both the producers and the interpreters of the document, but also to the political process of production and interpretation in which the texts are embedded. Text World Theory and Cognitive Linguistics are the tools for analysing the different types of mental representations that are recalled by each instance of discourse.
Published online: 7 May 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.55.10fil
References (21)
References
Achugar, M. 2008. What We Remember. The Construction of Memory in Military Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alonso, R. 2001. Irlanda del Norte. Una Historia de Guerra y la Búsqueda de la Paz. Madrid: Editorial Complutense.Google Scholar
Aughey, A. 2002. The art and effect of political lying in Northern Ireland. Irish Political Studies 17(2), pp. 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berger, P. and T. Luckman. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. 2005. Politicians and Rhetoric. The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Chilton, P.A. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse. Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. and M. Turner. 2002. The Way We Think. Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Filardo-Llamas, L. 2008. A comparative study of the discursive legitimation of the agreement by the four main Northern Irish political parties throughout time. Ethnopolitics 7(1), pp. 21–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Proposal for the analysis of the legitimatory function of political discourse in the Northern Irish context. In I. Iñigo-Mora et al. . (eds.), Analysing Political Discourse Strategies. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 135–152Google Scholar
. 2010. Discourse worlds in Northern Ireland: The Legitimisation of the 1998 Agreement. In K. Hayward and C. O’Donnell (eds.), Debating Conflict and Peace: Dissonant discourses in Northern Ireland. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 62–76Google Scholar
Gavins, J. 2007. Text World Theory. An Introduction. Edinburg: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd edition. (Revised by ­Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hayward, K. 2010. The role of political discourse in conflict transformation: Evidence from Northern Ireland. In K. Hayward and C. O’Donnell (Eds.), Debating Conflict and Peace: Dissonant Discourses in Northern Ireland. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
Laclau, E. 2007 [1996]. Emancipation(s), London: Verso.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. 2008. Cognitive Grammar. A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, T.A. 1998. Ideology. A Multidisciplinary Introduction. London: SageGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Contextual knowledge management in discourse production: A CDA perspective. In R. Wodak and P. Chilton (eds.) A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 71–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Leeuwen, T. and R. Wodak. 1999. Legitimizing immigration control: A Discourse-Historical­ Approach. Discourse Studies 1(1), pp. 83–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wenden, A. L. and C. Schäffner. 1995. Introduction. In C. Schäffner and A. L. Wenden (Eds.) Language and Peace. London: Routledge, pp. xv–xxv.Google Scholar
Werth, P. 1999. Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.