Part of
Trust and Discourse: Organizational perspectivesEdited by Katja Pelsmaekers, Geert Jacobs and Craig Rollo
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 56] 2014
► pp. 181–200
Edited by Katja Pelsmaekers, Geert Jacobs and Craig Rollo
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 56] 2014
► pp. 181–200
Chapter 9. “There is reason to believe however…”
The construction of trust in Late Modern English correspondence and non-literary prose
References (32)
Primary sources
19CSC, Dossena, Marina and Dury, Richard (compilers). In preparation. A Corpus of Nineteenth-Century Scottish Correspondence.
CMSW, The Corpus of Modern Scottish Writing, (1700-1945, [URL] (last access Sept. 2013).
N&Q, Notes and Queries, 1840-1869 issues available in the Internet Library of Early Journals, [URL] (last access Sept. 2013)
The New York Times. In Google News Archive service, at [URL] (UK edition - last access Sept. 2013)
Secondary sources
Bailey, Richard W. (1996). Nineteenth-Century English. Ann Arbor:University of Michigan Press.
Beal, Joan C. (2004). English in Modern Times: 1700–1945. London: Arnold.
Brown, Penelope & C. Levinson Stephen. (1987). Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Del Lungo Camiciotti, Gabriella. (2012). ‘An atypical commercial correspondence: negotiating artefacts and status’. In Marina Dossena & Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti (Eds), 105-120. Letter Writing in Late Modern Europe. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 
Dossena, Marina (2004). ‘Towards a corpus of nineteenth-century Scottish correspondence’. Linguistica e Filologia 18. 195-214.
(2006a). ‘Stance and authority in nineteenth-century bank correspondence – A case study’. In Marina Dossena & Susan M. Fitzmaurice (Eds), Business and Official Correspondence: Historical Investigations. 175-192. Bern: Peter Lang.
(2006b). ‘Forms of self-representation in nineteenth-century business letters’. In Marina Dossena & Irma Taavitsainen (Eds), Diachronic Perspectives on Domain-Specific English, 173-190. Bern: Peter Lang.
(2008). ‘“We beg leave to refer to your decision”: Pragmatic traits of nineteenth-century business correspondence’. In Marina Dossena & Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (Eds), Studies in Late Modern English Correspondence: Methodology and Data, 235-255. Bern: Peter Lang.
(2010a). ‘Building trust through (self-)appraisal in nineteenth-century business correspondence’. In Päivi Pahta, Minna Nevala, Arja Nurmi & Minna Palander-Collin (Eds), Social Roles and Language Practices in Late Modern English, 191-209. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
(2010b). ‘“Be pleased to report expressly”: The development of public style English in nineteenth-century business and official correspondence’. In Raymond Hickey (Ed.), Eighteenth Century English. Ideology and Change, 293-308. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2012a). ‘Late Modern English – Semantics and Lexicon’. In Alexander Bergs & Laurel Brinton (Eds), HSK 34.1 – English Historical Linguistics – An International Handbook, 887-900. Berlin: De Gruyter.
(2012b). ‘The study of correspondence: theoretical and methodological issues’. In Marina Dossena & Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti (Eds), Letter Writing in Late Modern Europe, 13-30. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Dury, Richard (2006). ‘A corpus of nineteenth-century business correspondence: Methodology of transcription’. In Marina Dossena & Susan M. Fitzmaurice (Eds), Business and Official Correspondence: Historical Investigations, 193-205. Bern: Peter Lang.
Görlach, Manfred (1999). English in Nineteenth-Century England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grice, Paul H. (1975 [1989]). ‘Logic and conversation’. In Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (Eds), Syntax and Semantics, 3: Speech Acts, New York: Academic Press. Reprinted in Paul H. Grice (Ed.), Studies in the Way of Words, 22-40. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hickey, Raymond (ed.) (2010). Eighteenth-Century English. Ideology and Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kohnen, Thomas (2007). ‘Text types and the methodology of diachronic speech act analysis’. In Susan M. Fitzmaurice & Irma Taavitsainen (Eds), Methods in Historical Pragmatics, 139-166. Berlin: de Gruyter.
(2008). ‘Tracing directives through text and time: Towards a methodology of a corpus-based diachronic speech-act analysis’. In Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (Eds), Speech Acts in the History of English, 295-310. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Kytö, Merja, Mats Rydén & Erik Smitterberg (Eds). (2006). Nineteenth-Century English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Landale, James (2006). Duel. A True Story of Death and Honour. Edinburgh: Canongate.
Mäkinen, Martti (2006). ‘Dissemination of textual material and second-generation corpora: Finding intertexts in early English medical writing’. In Marina Dossena & Irma Taavitsainen (Eds), Diachronic Perspectives on Domain-Specific English, 191-205. Bern: Peter Lang.
Martin, James R. & Peter. R. R. White (2005). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mugglestone, Lynda (2006). ‘English in the nineteenth century’. In Lynda Mugglestone (Ed.), The Oxford History of English, 274-304. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pahta, Päivi, Minna Nevala, Arja Nurmi & Minna Palander-Collin (Eds.). (2010). Social Roles and Language Practices in Late Modern English. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Sunderland, David (2007). Social Capital, Trust and the Industrial Revolution: 1780 1880. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.
White, Peter R.R. (2007). ‘Appraisal’. In Jan-Ola Östman & Jef Verschueren (Eds). Handbook of Pragmatics Online, s.v. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, at [URL] (last access Aug. 2013).