Chapter published in:
Identity Struggles: Evidence from workplaces around the world
Edited by Dorien Van De Mieroop and Stephanie Schnurr
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 69] 2017
► pp. 165184


Akkerman, Sanne, Wilfried Admiraai and Robert Jan Simons
2012 “Unity and diversity in a collaborative research project.” Culture & Psychology 18(2): 227–252. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Seongsook and Stephanie Schnurr
2014 “Exploring distributed leadership: solving disagreements and negotiating consensus in a ‘leaderless’ team.” Discourse Studies 16(1): 3–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clift, Rebecca
2001 “Meaning in interaction: the case of ‘actually’.” Language 77(2): 245–291. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., Rob Grootendorst, Sally Jackson and Scott Jacobs
1993Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse. Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Fasulo, Alessandra and Cristina Zucchermaglio
2002 “My selves and I: identity markers in work meeting talk.” Journal of Pragmatics 34: 1119–1144. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, Steve
2002Social Epistemology (2nd edn). Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Gerholm, Tomas
1990 “On tacit knowledge in academia.” European Journal of Education 25(3): 263–271. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen
1987The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 2. Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason (Translated by Thomas McCarthy). Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
2001On the Pragmatics of Social Interaction. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Henkel, Mary
2000Academic Identities and Policy Change in Higher Education. London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
Heritage, John
1984 “A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement”. In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by John M. Atkinson and John Heritage, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2012a “Epistemics in action. Action formation and territories of knowlsdge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(1): 1–29 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012b “The epistemic engine: sequence organization and territories of knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(1): 30–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John and Raymond, Geoffrey
2005 “The terms of agreement: indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly 68(1): 15–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Housley, William
2000 “Category work and knowledgeability within multidisciplinary teams.” Text 20(1): 83–107. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
1984 “On stepwise transition from talk about a trouble to inappropriately next-positioned matters.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by John M. Atkinson and John Heritage, 192–222. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1979 “A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance declination.” In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas, 79–96. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
Jovchelovitch, Sandra
2007Knowledge in Context: Representations, Community and Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Katze, Michael G.
2013 “Preface.” In Systems Biology ed. by Michael, G. Katze, v-x. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kogan, Maurice
2000 “Higher education communities and academic identities.” Higher Education Quarterly 54(3): 207–216. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lattuca, Lisa R.
g 2002 “Learning interdisciplinarity: sociocultural perspectives on academic work.” The Journal of Higher Education 73(6): 711–739. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lingard, Lorelei, Catherine F. Schryer, Marlee M. Stafford and Sandra L. Campbell
2007 “Negotiating the politics of identity in an interdisciplinary team.” Qualitative Research 7(4) 501–519. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maynard, Douglas W.
2013 “Defensive mechanisms: I -mean prefaced utterances in complaint and other conversational sequences”. In Conversational Repair and Human Understanding, ed. by Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond, Jack Sidnell, 198–233. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mayr, Ernst
1982The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Moran, Joe
2010Interdisciplinarity (2nd edn). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Morrison, Philip S., Gill Dobie and Fiona J. McDonald
2003 “Research Collaboration Among University Scientists.” Higher Education Research & Development 22(3): 275–296. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Myers, Greg
1990Writing Biology: Texts in the Construction of Scientific Knowledge. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor and Sally Jacoby
1997 “Down to the wire: The cultural clock of physicists and the discourse of consensus.” Language in Society, 26: 479–505. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, Sally Jacoby and Patrick Gonzales
1994 “Interpretive Journeys: How Physicists Talk and Travel through Graphic Space.” Configurations, 2(1): 151–171. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Keefe, Barbara J. and Pamela Benoit
1982 “Children’s Arguments.” In Advances in Argumentation Theory and Research, ed. by Robert J. Cox and Charles A. Willard, 154–183. Carbondale and Edwardsville IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, Carole L.
1999 “Structures and strategies of interdisciplinary science.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 50(3): 242–253. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paulus, Tanya M., Marianne Woodside and Mary F. Ziegler
2010 “’I tell you, it’s a journey, isn’t it?’ Understanding collaborative meaning making in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry 16(10): 852–862. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita
1984 “Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by John M. Atkinson and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rowley-Jolivet, Elizabeth and Shirley Carter-Thomas
2005 “The rhetoric of conference presentation introductions: context, argument and interaction.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 15(1): 45–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
1992Lectures on Conversation, Vol. 1. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya and Frederico Rossano
2010 “Mobilizing response. Research on Language and Social Interaction 43(1): 3–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Strober, Myra H.
2011Interdisciplinary Conversations: Challenging Habits of Thought. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Tracy, Karen and Julie M. Naughton
2000 “Institutional identity-work: a better lens.” In Small Talk, ed. by Justin Coupland, 62–83. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Tully, James
1999 “To think and act differently: Foucault’s four reciprocal objections to Habermas’ theory. In Foucault contra Habermas: Recasting the Dialogue between Genealogy and Critical Theory, ed. by Samantha Ashenden and David Owen, 90–142. London: Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Hah, Sixian
2020. Valuation discourses and disciplinary positioning struggles of academic researchers—A case study of ‘maverick’ academics. Palgrave Communications 6:1 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.