Cover not available
Part of
Identity Struggles: Evidence from workplaces around the world
Edited by Dorien Van De Mieroop and Stephanie Schnurr
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 69] 2017
► pp. 185–206

Chapter 10
Laughables as a resource for foregrounding shared knowledge and shared identities in intercultural interactions in Scandinavia

This paper employs Membership Categorization Analysis to illustrate how laughables are used as a resource for establishing co-membership and identification with professional and ‘other’ social identities within a range of different work-places in Denmark and Norway. Conversation analytical studies have previously shown how laughables and laughter attend to a range of social functions such as affiliation (Glenn 2010), seeking intimacy and handling ‘troubles talk’ (Jefferson 1984; Jefferson et al. 1987). This paper focuses on the former of these functions and argues that laughables are a resource to propose co-membership (Erickson and Schultz 1982) and that epistemics (Heritage 2012b; Stivers et al 2011) are central to this process. While previous studies have documented the interrelation of professional and other social categories, this chapter shows that laughables are used by participants to foreground (or background) the relevance of shared identities and that this can work to bridge differences in either professional identities or other identities. The chapter furthermore shows how the shared common sense knowledge proposed by the laughable reveals broader structures of meaning and ideologies involved in local negotiations of identities and category memberships (Billig 1991; Billig 2005; Tranekjær 2014; Tranekjær 2015; Wetherell 1998).
Keywords: Membership Categorization Analysis, Co-membership, Laughables, Intraculturality, Common sense laughable, affiliation, religion, second-language interactions, student counselling, construction sites, internship interviews, ideology
Article outline
  • Introduction
    • Laughables, identity struggles and co-membership
  • Membership categorisation and epistemics
  • Data
  • Analysis
  • Conclusion
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 26 April 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.69.10tra
References (63)
References
Alexander, Bryant Keith. 2004. Passing, Cultural Performance, and Individual Agency: Performative Reflections on Black Masculine Identity. Cultural Studies. Critical Methodologies 4: 377–404. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Angouri, Jo. 2011. ‘We are in a masculine profession … ‘: Constructing gender identities in a consortium of two multinational engineering companies. Gender and Language 5: 373–403. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Angouri, Jo and Meredith Marra (eds) 2011. Constructing Identities at Work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Angouri, Jo and Marlene Miglbauer. 2014. ‘And then we summarise in English for the others’: The lived experience of the multilingual workplace. Multilingua-Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication 33: 147–72.Google Scholar
Antaki, Charles and Sue Widdicombe (eds) 1998. Identities in Talk. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Billig, Michael. 1991. Ideology and Opinions. Studies in Rhetorical Psychology London: Sage.Google Scholar
. 2005. Laughter and Ridicule. Towards a Social Critique of Humour. London: Sage. 24Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary and Kira Hall. 2008. Finding identity: Theory and data. Multilingua-Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication 27: 151–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Button, Graham. 1992. Answers as Interactional Products: Two Sequential Practices Used in Job Interviews. In Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 200–12. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Sarah and Celia Roberts. 2007. Migration, ethnicity and competing discourses in the job interview: synthesizing the institutional and personal. Discourse & Society 18: 243–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Catherine Evans. 2010. Joking as boundary negotiation among "good old boys": "White trash" as a social category at the bottom of the Southern working class in Alabama. Humor 23: 179–200.Google Scholar
Day, Dennis. 1998. Being Ascribed, and Resisting, Membership of an Ethnic Group. In Identities in Talk, ed. by Charles Antaki and Sue Widdicombe, 151–71. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Dervin, Fred and Karen Risager (eds) 2015. Researching Identity and Interculturality. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Erickson, Frederick and Jeffrey Schultz. 1982. The Counselor as Gatekeeper: Social Interaction in Interviews. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Evnitskaya, Natalia and Tom Morton. 2011. Knowledge construction, meaning-making and interaction in CLIL science classroom communities of practice. Language and Education 25: 109–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fogtmann, Christina. 2007. Samtaler med Politiet. Copenhagen: Copenhagen University.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1971. The Discourse on Language. The Archeology of Knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books. 25Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold and Harvey Sacks. 1970. On Formal Structures of Practical Actions. In Theoretical Sociology, ed. by John C. McKinney and Edward A. Tiryakian, 337–66. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Glenn, Phillip. 2003. Laughter in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Interviewer laughs: Shared laughter and asymmetries in employment interviews. Journal of Pragmatics 42: 1485–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John. 2012a. The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45: 30–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012b. Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45: 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John and D. Rod Watson. 1979. Formulations as conversational objects. In Everyday Language. Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas, 123–62. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
Heritage, John and Geoffrey Raymond. 2005. The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Talk-in-Interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly 68: 15–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hester, Stephen and Peter Eglin. 1997. Membership Categorization Analysis: An Introduction. Culture in Action. In Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis, ed. by Stephen Hester and Peter Eglin, 1–25. Washington D.C.: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis & University Press of America.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet. 2006a. Gendered Talk at Work: Constructing Gender Identity through Work-Place Discourse. New York, Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006b. Sharing a laugh: Pragmatic aspects of humor and gender in the workplace. Journal of Pragmatics 38: 26–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Monitoring organisational boundaries: Diverse discourse strategies used in gatekeeping. Journal of Pragmatics 39: 1993–2016. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet and Meredith Marra. 2002a. Having a laugh at work: how humour contributes to workplace culture. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 1683–710.Google Scholar
. 2002b. Humour as a discursive boundary marker in social interaction. In Us and Others, ed. by Anna Duszak, 377–400. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet, Mereith Marra. 2011. Leadership discourse in a Maori workplace: negotiating gender, ethnicity and leadership at work. Gender and Language 5: 317–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haakana, Marku. 1999. Laughing Matters. A Conversation Analytical Study of Laughter in Doctor-Patient Interaction. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1984. On the organization of laughter in talk about troubles. In Structures of Social Action Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by John Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 346–69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail, Harvey Sacks and Emanuel Schegloff. 1977. Preliminary Notes on the Sequential Organization of Laughter. In Pragmatics Microfiche. Cambridge: Cambridge University.Google Scholar
. 1987. Notes on laughter in the pursuit of intimacy. In Talk and Social Organization, ed. by Graham Button and J. R.E. Lee, 152–205. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Karrebæk, Martha Sif. 2013. “Don’t speak like that to her!” Linguistic minority childrens socialisation into an ideology of monolingualism. Journal of Sociolinguistics 17: 355–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kerekes, Julie A. 2006. Winning an interviewer’s trust in a gatekeeping encounter. Language in Society 35: 27–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kirilova, Marta. 2012. All Dressed Up and Nowhere to Go: Linguistic, Cultural and Ideological Aspects of Job Interviews with Second Language Speakers of Danish. University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Landgrebe, Jeannette. 2012. Epistemic and Material Resources for Sense- and Decisionmaking in Collaborative Processes of Innovation and Design. Kolding: University of Southern Denmark.Google Scholar
Lepper, Georgia. 2000. Categories in Text and Talk. London: Sage Publication. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lynch, Owen. 2010. Cooking with humor: In-group humor as social organization. Humour 23: 127–59.Google Scholar
Marra, Meredith and Janet Holmes. 2008. Constructing ethnicity in New Zealand workplace stories. Text & Talk 28.397–419. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Elizabeth R. 2013. Positioning selves, doing relational work and constructing identities in interview talk. Journal of Politeness Research-Language Behaviour Culture 9: 75–95.Google Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza. 2004. Ways of ‘Doing Being Plurilingual’ in International Work Meetings. In Second Language Conversations, ed by Rod Gardner and Johannes Wagner, 18–39. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey and John Heritage. 2006. The Epistemics of Social Relations: Owning Grandchildren. Language in Society 35: 677–705. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Celia and Srikant Sarangi (eds) 1999. Talk, Work and Institutional Order: Discourse in medical, mediation and management settings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1972a. An Initial Investigation of the Usability of Conversational Data for Doing Sociology. In Studies in Social Interaction, ed. by David Sudnow, 31–74. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
. 1972b. On the Analyzability of stories by children. In Directions in Sociolinguistics, ed. by John Gumperz and Dell Hymes, 329–45. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
. 1995a. Lecture 6: The MIR Membership Categorization Device, Fall 1964-Spring 1965. In Lectures on Conversation, ed. by Gail Jefferson, 40–48. Cambridge: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995b. Lecture 8 ‘We;’ Category-bound activities, Spring 1966. In Lectures on conversation, ed. by Gail Jefferson, 333–40. Cambridge: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverman, David. 1998. Harvey Sacks. Social Science & Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Speer, Susan A. 2009. Passing as a transsexual woman in the gender identity clinic. In Theorizing Identities and Social Action, ed. by Margaret Wetherell, 116–38. Bassingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, Mondada, Lorenza, Jakob Steensig (ed.) 2011. The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stokoe, Elizabeth. 2012. Moving forward with membership categorization analysis: Methods for systematic analysis. Discourse Studies 14: 277–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tranekjær, Louise. 2011. I praktik som dansker. Nordand – Nordisk tidsskrift for andrespråksforskning 6: 7–35.Google Scholar
. 2014. Discursive ethnography – a microanalytical perspective on cultural performance and common sense in student counseling interviews. Identity and Interculturaliy – Reflexivity in Research Methodology, ed. by Fred Dervin and Karen Risager, 125–150. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2015. Interactional Categorisation and Gatekeeping: Institutional Encounters with Otherness. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Van De Mieroop, Dorien and Stephanie Schnurr. 2014. Negotiating meaning and co-constructing institutionalisable answers: Leadership through gate-keeping in performance appraisal interviews. Journal of Pragmatics 67: 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watson, Rod. 1997. Some General Reflections on ‘Categorization’ and ‘Sequence’ in the Analysis of Conversation. In Culture in Action: studies in Membership Categorization Analysis, ed. by Stephen Hester and Peter Eglin, 49–75. Washington D.C.: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis and University Press of America.Google Scholar
Wetherell, Margaret. 1998. Positioning and interpretative repertoires: conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse & Society 9: 387–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yeadon-Lee, Tracey. 2012. Doing Identity with Style: Service Interaction, Work Practices and the Construction of ‘Expert’ Status in the Contemporary Hair Salon. Sociological Research Online 17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, Don H. 1998. Identity, Context and Interaction. In Identities in Talk, ed. by Charles Antaki and Sue Widdicombe, 87–106. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Al-Khulaifi, Afra & Dorien Van De Mieroop
2024. “Why not the thoub and the abaya?” An interactional sociolinguistic approach to the interplay between nationality, gender, and professional identity in the Qatari academic workplace. Journal of Arabic Sociolinguistics 2:1 ► pp. 94 ff. DOI logo
Kappa, Katherine
2019. The Social Integration of Asylum Seekers and Refugees: An Interactional Perspective. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 17:3 ► pp. 353 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. Discursive Navigation of Employable Identities in the Narratives of Former Refugees [Studies in Narrative, 27], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.