Chapter published in:
Developing New Identities in Social Conflicts: Constructivist perspectives
Edited by Esperanza Morales-López and Alan Floyd
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 71] 2017
► pp. 2–15

Constructionism in historical writing

Even though it is not a science in the modernist sense of the term, history remains foundational – a necessary presupposition – of modern social sciences. History serves as a paradigm referent for contrast with both abstract natural sciences and literary or artistic fictions. Indeed, history serves as the very antonym of fiction in discussions of the nature of a fact. And yet, history considered as a domain of events that are “real” rather than “imaginary,” can be shown on analysis to be as much “constructed” as “found” in the data it considers to be evidence of the reality of its referent (the past). Construction in historiography begins with the initial description of its referent as a historical phenomenon, moves on through the establishment of the “factuality” of this phenomenon and ends in the composition of a series of historical facts as a story. Stories are not pictures of reality or even representations thereof; they are presentations in fictional modes of an unobservable past treated as reality.
Keywords: constructionism, the Past, story, plot, tropes
Published online: 26 July 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.71.01whi
References

References

Burke, Kenneth
1969 A Grammar of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Croce, Benedetto
1938 History as the Story of Liberty. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund Inc. 2000.Google Scholar
Danto, Arthur C.
1985 Narration and Knowledge. New York: Columbia University Press 1985.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques
1970 “Structure, Sign, and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences.” In The Languages of Criticism and the Sciences of Man, ed. by Richard Macksey and Eugenio Donato, 247–265. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, Nelson
1984 Of Mind and Other Matters. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel
1966 The Order of Things: An Archeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Pantheon Books 1970.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart
2002 The Practice of Conceptual History: Timing History, Spacing Concepts. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mink, Louis O.
1987 Historical Understanding. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Momigliano, Arnaldo
1981 “The History of Rhetoric and the Rhetoric of History.” In Comparative Criticism: A Yearbook, ed. by E. E. Sheffer, 259–268. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2016 “The Rules of the Game in the Study of Ancient History.” History and Theory 55 (1): 39–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rice, Donald and Schofer, Peter
1983 Rhetorical Poetics: Theory and Practice of Figural and Symbolic Reading in Modern French Literature. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, George
1999 “No Sex Please, We’re Americans: Erotophobia, Liberation, and Cultural History.” In Cultural History After Foucault, ed. by John Neubauer, 3–36. New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
White, Hayden
1973 Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in 19th Century Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard
2002 Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Pawluch, Dorothy
2019. On the Unbearable Lightness of Being a Constructionist. The American Sociologist 50:2 ► pp. 204 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 05 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.