Chapter 1
Constructionism in historical writing
Even though it is not a science in the modernist sense of the term, history remains foundational – a necessary presupposition – of modern social sciences. History serves as a paradigm referent for contrast with both abstract natural sciences and literary or artistic fictions. Indeed, history serves as the very antonym of fiction in discussions of the nature of a fact. And yet, history considered as a domain of events that are “real” rather than “imaginary,” can be shown on analysis to be as much “constructed” as “found” in the data it considers to be evidence of the reality of its referent (the past). Construction in historiography begins with the initial description of its referent as a historical phenomenon, moves on through the establishment of the “factuality” of this phenomenon and ends in the composition of a series of historical facts as a story. Stories are not pictures of reality or even representations thereof; they are presentations in fictional modes of an unobservable past treated as reality.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction: Theoretical background
- 2.How does symbolization work in historical discourse?
-
Notes
-
References
References (14)
References
Burke, Kenneth. 1969. A Grammar of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Croce, Benedetto. 1938. History as the Story of Liberty. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund Inc. 2000.
Danto, Arthur C. 1985. Narration and Knowledge. New York: Columbia University Press 1985.
Derrida, Jacques. 1970. “Structure, Sign, and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences.” In The Languages of Criticism and the Sciences of Man, ed. by Richard Macksey and Eugenio Donato, 247–265. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
Goodman, Nelson. 1984. Of Mind and Other Matters. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Foucault, Michel. 1966. The Order of Things: An Archeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Pantheon Books 1970.
Koselleck, Reinhart. 2002. The Practice of Conceptual History: Timing History, Spacing Concepts. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Mink, Louis O. 1987. Historical Understanding. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Momigliano, Arnaldo. 1981. “The History of Rhetoric and the Rhetoric of History.” In Comparative Criticism: A Yearbook, ed. by E. E. Sheffer, 259–268. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Momigliano, Arnaldo. 2016. “The Rules of the Game in the Study of Ancient History.” History and Theory 55 (1): 39–45.
Rice, Donald and Schofer, Peter. 1983. Rhetorical Poetics: Theory and Practice of Figural and Symbolic Reading in Modern French Literature. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Rousseau, George. 1999. “No Sex Please, We’re Americans: Erotophobia, Liberation, and Cultural History.” In Cultural History After Foucault, ed. by John Neubauer, 3–36. New York: De Gruyter.
White, Hayden. 1973. Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in 19th Century Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Williams, Bernard. 2002. Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Pawluch, Dorothy
2019.
On the Unbearable Lightness of Being a Constructionist.
The American Sociologist 50:2
► pp. 204 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.