Cover not available
Part of
Developing New Identities in Social Conflicts: Constructivist perspectives
Edited by Esperanza Morales-López and Alan Floyd
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 71] 2017
► pp. 41–66

Chapter 3
The discursive construction of reality in the context of rhetoric

Constructivist rhetoric

In this chapter, I reflect on the rhetorical origins of the constructivist tradition and its current revival in this latter discipline. I begin with a brief history of the evolution of rhetorical thinking from its origin in antiquity, considering its subsequent conversion into a mere treatise on stylistic resources; this understanding of rhetoric would last for centuries in the West, and would lead it to its decline, until it later recovered during the twentieth century. Its development over the last hundred years is summarised on three levels: (1) restoration of the tradition inherited (inventory of tropes and figures of speech), (2) recovery of all five rhetorical operations and their political and social reuse and (3) configuration of constructivist rhetoric. This third level is my proposal. I define our understanding of the totality of discursive-rhetorical strategies, and the construction of diverse rhetorical speeches, as the way we make conscious our cognitive experiences.
Keywords: rhetoric, constructivism, constructivist rhetoric, discourse analysis, cognitive frame
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The epistemological basis of ancient sophistry (constructivism Avant la Lettre) and its historical disrepute
  • 3.The beginnings of the recovery of rhetoric in the twentieth century
  • 4.The revival of rhetoric and constructivism: The return to elocutio and the third level of revival of rhetorical thinking
  • 5.The connection between rhetoric and discourse analysis
  • 6.A final word
  • References
Published online: 26 July 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.71.03puj
References (90)
References
Albaladejo, Tomás. 1989. Retórica. Madrid: Síntesis.Google Scholar
Althusser, Louis. 1970. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatus (Notes Towards and Investigation)”. In Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, by Louis Althusser (Translation by B. Brewster), 85–126. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Anceschi, Luciano. 1984. L’Ideal del Barocco: Studi su un Problema Estetico. Bolonia: Nuova Alfa.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1989. Teoría y Estética de la Novela. Madrid: Taurus.Google Scholar
Bolívar, Adriana. 2001. “El personalismo en la democracia venezolana y cambios en el diálogo político.” Discurso y Sociedad 3 (1): 103–134.Google Scholar
. 2009. “‘Democracia’ y ‘revolución’ en Venezuela: un análisis crítico del discurso político desde la lingüística basada en corpus.” Oralia 12: 27–54.Google Scholar
. 2016. “El discurso de la afectividad en la interacción política.” In Oralidad y análisis del discurso. Homenaje a Luis Cortés Rodríguez, ed. by Antonio Miguel Bañón Hernández, María del Mar Espejo Muriel, Bárbara Herrero Muñoz-Cobo and Juan Luis López Cruces, 61–79. Almería: Universidad de Almería.Google Scholar
Capra, Fritjof. 1975. The Tao of Physics. Boston: Shambhala Publications.Google Scholar
. 1996. La Trama de la Vida. Una Nueva Perspectiva de los Sistemas Vivos. Barcelona: Anagrama 1998.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analyzing Political Discourse. Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cicero. 1892. De Inventione. Book I. Translated and with an introduction by E. N. P Moor. London: Methuen & Co. ([URL]).
. 1982. De Oratore book III. Translated by Harris Rackham. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press-William Heinemann LTD.Google Scholar
. 1985. De l’Orateur. Translated by Edmond Courbaud. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Damasio, António R. 2010. Y el Cerebro Creó al Hombre. ¿Cómo Pudo el Cerebro Generar Emociones, Sentimientos y el Yo? Barcelona: Destino.Google Scholar
De Man, Paul. 1979. Allegories of Reading. Figural Language in Rousseau, Nietzsche, Rilke, and Proust. New Haven-London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1978. Espolones. Los Estilos de Nietzsche. Valencia: Pre-textos 1981.Google Scholar
Diels, Hermann. 1903. Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Diogenes Laertius. 1925. Lives of Eminent Philosophers, II. London-New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
Duranti, Alexandro. 1997. Antropología Lingüística. Madrid: Cambridge University Press 2000. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman and Wodak, Ruth. 1997. “Análisis crítico del discurso.” In El Discurso como Interacción Social, vol. 2, ed. by Teun A. van Dijk, 367–404. Barcelona: Gedisa 2000.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman and Fairclough, Isabela. 2012. Political Discourse Analysis. A Method for Advances Students. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Frye, Northrop. 1957. Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley. 1989. Práctica sin Teoría: Retórica y Cambio en la Vida Institucional. Barcelona: Destino 1992.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans- Georg. 1960. Verdad y Método II. Salamanca: Sígueme 1992.Google Scholar
García Berrio, Antonio. 1968. España e Italia ante el Conceptismo. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.Google Scholar
. 1979. “Poética e ideología del discurso clásico.” Revista de Literatura XLI (81): 5–40.Google Scholar
. 1979a. “Lingüística, literaridad/poeticidad (Gramática, Pragmática, Texto).” 1616. Anuario de la Sociedad Española de Literatura General y Comparada 2: 125–170.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Gorgias. 2003. Encomium of Helen. In The Greek Sophists, ed. by John Dillon and Tania Gergel. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Grassi, Ernesto. 1986. La Filosofía del Humanismo. Preeminencia de la Palabra. Barcelona: Anthropos 1993.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. 1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1936. Hölderlin y la Esencia de la Poesía. Barcelona: Anthropos 1989.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell. 1974. Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Jung, Carl Gustav. 1997. Erinnerungen, Träume, Gedanken. Zürich- Düsseldorf: Walter Verlag.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. Chicago: Chicago University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh. The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
. 2002. Moral Politics. How Liberals and Conservatives Think. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Maingueneau, Dominique. 1987. Nouvelles Tendances en Analyse du Discourse. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Maturana, Humberto and Varela, Francisco. 1998. The Tree of Knowledge. The Biological Roots of Human Understanding. Boston: Shambhala.Google Scholar
Maturana, Humberto. 1996. La Realidad: ¿Objetiva o Construida? Vol. 2. Barcelona – México, DF: Anthropos – Universidad Iberoamericana.Google Scholar
. 2006. “Self-consciousness: How? When? Where?” Constructivist Foundations 1 (3): 91–102.Google Scholar
Macdonell, Diane. 1986. Theories of Discourse. An Introduction. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mendiola Mejía, Alfonso. 2003. Retórica, Comunicación y Realidad. La Construcción Retórica de las Batallas en las Crónicas de la Conquista. México: Universidad Iberoamericana.Google Scholar
Morales-López, Esperanza. 2004. “Las aproximaciones americanas al análisis del discurso oral: perspectivas de futuro.” In Caminos de la Semiótica en la última década del siglo XX, ed. by David Pujante, 109–123. Valladolid: University of Valladolid.Google Scholar
. 2011. “Hacia dónde va el Análisis del discurso.” Tonos Digital 21. ([URL]).
Nespereira García, Javier. 2014. Estrategias Discursivas en la Comunicación de Crisis Sanitarias. (Retórica y Teoría de la Argumentación). El Caso de la Gripe A en 2009. PhD diss., University of Valladolid.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 2000. Escritos sobre Retórica. Madrid: Trotta.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor. 2000. “Narrativa.” In El Discurso como Estructura y Proceso. Estudios sobre el Discurso I. Una Introducción Multidisciplinar, ed. by Teun A. van Dijk, 271–303. Barcelona: Gedisa.Google Scholar
Pêcheux, Michel. 1975. Language, Semantics and Ideology. London: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
Poliziano, Angelo. 2015. Praelectio in Priora Aristotelis Analytica, cui Titulus Lamia. [URL]. Accessed November 2, 2015.
Porqueras Mayo, Alberto. 1986. La Teoría Poética en el Renacimiento y Manierismo Españoles. Barcelona: Puvill Libros.Google Scholar
Pujante, David. 1990. “Matizaciones a los orígenes y el concepto de imaginación romántica.” Revista de Literatura LII (103): 179–192.Google Scholar
. 1997. Un Vino Generoso. (Sobre el Nacimiento de la Estética Nietzscheana, 1871–1873). Murcia: Universidad de Murcia.Google Scholar
. 1998. “El discurso político como discurso retórico. Estado de la cuestión.” Teoría/Crítica 5: 307–336.Google Scholar
. 1999. El Hijo de la Persuasión. Quintiliano y el Estatuto Retórico. Second and update edition. Logroño: Gobierno de la Rioja – Instituto de Estudios Riojanos – Ayuntamiento de Calahorra.Google Scholar
. 2003. Manual de Retórica. Madrid: Castalia.Google Scholar
. 2004. “Razón poética, razón retórica. (Los filósofos contra los sofistas: un lugar para María Zambrano en esta polémica tradicional).” Postdata. Revista de Artes, Letras y Pensamiento 26: 191–199.Google Scholar
. 2012. “La operación elocutio, ¿una reina destronable?: su complejo predominio en el discurso retórico.” In Retórica y Política. Los Discursos de la Construcción de la Sociedad, ed. by Emilio del Río, María del Carmen Ruiz de la Cierva and Tomás Albaladejo, 175–188. Logroño: Gobierno de La Rioja – Instituto de Estudios Riojanos – Ayuntamiento de Calahorra.Google Scholar
Pujante, David and Morales-López, Esperanza. 2008. “A Political Action Against Popular Opinion: Aznar’s Final Speech before the Spanish Parliament Justifying the War in Iraq (December 2003).” Journal of Language and Politics 7 (1): 71–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Qvintiliani, M. Fabi. 1970. Institutionis Oratoriae Libri Duodecim. Recognovit brevique adnotatione critica instrvxit M. Winterbottom, t. I-II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Salvador, Vicent. 2014. “El debate social sobre las fuentes de energía: representaciones semánticas y gestión social de los conocimientos.” Culture, Language and Representation 13: 221–243.Google Scholar
Santayana, George. 1946. The Idea of Christ in the Gospels; or, God in Man: A Critical Essay. New York: Scribner’s.Google Scholar
Sextus Empiricus. 1949. Against Professors. Translation by R. G. Bury. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996. Outlines of Pyrrhonism. Translation by B. Mates. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Steiner, George. 1978. Heidegger. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica 1986.Google Scholar
. 1997. Errata. El Examen de una Vida. Madrid: Siruela 1998.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. 1987. Racismo y Análisis Crítico de los Medios. Barcelona: Paidós 1997.Google Scholar
1993. Racismo y Discurso de las Élites. Barcelona: Gedisa. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998. Ideology. A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar
2003. Ideología y Discurso. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
2008. Discourse and Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vico, Giambattista. 1725. Scienza nuova, The First New Science, edited and translated by Leon Pompa, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2002.Google Scholar
. 1730/1744. The New Science. Revised translation of the third edition by Thomas Goddard Bergin and Max Harold Fisch. New York: Cornell University Press 1948.Google Scholar
Vizmanos, Francisco de B. (ed.). 1949. Las Vírgenes Cristianas de la Iglesia Primitiva, Madrid: Biblioteca de Autores Cristianos.Google Scholar
Vives, Juan Luis. 1531. De Disciplinis. Savoir et Enseigner. Paris: Les Belles Lettres 2013.Google Scholar
Voloshinov, Valentin N. 1929. El Marxismo y la Filosofía del Lenguaje. Madrid: Alianza 1992.Google Scholar
Watzlawick, Paul (ed.). 1981. The Invented Reality: How Do We Know What We Believe We Know? New York: Norton 1984.Google Scholar
White, Hayden. 1973. Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press 2014.Google Scholar
. 1978. Tropics of Discourse. Essays in Cultural Criticism. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
. 1999. Figural Realism. Studies in the Mimesis Effect. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
. 2003. El Texto Histórico como Artefacto Literario. Barcelona: Paidós.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1921. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Madrid: Alianza Editorial 1973.Google Scholar
. 1992. Lecciones y Conversaciones sobre Estética, Psicología y Creencia Religiosa. Barcelona: Paidós – Universidad de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, De Cillia, Rudolf, Reisigl, Martin and Liebhart, Karin. 1999. The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth and van Dijk, Teun A (eds.). 2000. Racism at the Top. Parliamentary Discourses on Ethnic Issues in Six European Countries. Klagenfurt/Cevolec: Drava Verlag.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth and Chilton, Paul (eds.). 2005. A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth and Koller, Veronika (eds.). 2008. Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere. Berlin: Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth and Meyer, Michael. 2009. “Critical Discourse Analysis: History, Agenda, Theory and Methodology.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, second edition, 1–33. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Amezcua, David
2019. Hauntologizing the (un)foreseen present: The 2008 financial crisis in Antonio Muñoz Molina’s La noche de los tiempos and Todo lo que era sólido. Journal of European Studies 49:3-4 ► pp. 324 ff. DOI logo
Morales-López, Esperanza
2019. Discourse Analysis: The Constructivist Perspective and Transdisciplinarity. In Complexity Applications in Language and Communication Sciences, ► pp. 187 ff. DOI logo
Morales-López, Esperanza
2022. What Does “¡Quédate en casa!” (‘Stay at Home!') Mean for a Poor Woman?. In Handbook of Research on Historical Pandemic Analysis and the Social Implications of COVID-19 [Advances in Human Services and Public Health, ], ► pp. 164 ff. DOI logo
Valdivia, Pablo
2019. Narrating crises and populism in Southern Europe: Regimes of metaphor. Journal of European Studies 49:3-4 ► pp. 282 ff. DOI logo
Valdivia, Pablo
2020. Cultural Narratives of Crisis and Populism in Spain: Metaphor, Nation-branding, and Social Change. In Languages of Resistance, Transformation, and Futurity in Mediterranean Crisis-Scapes, ► pp. 101 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.