Cover not available
Part of
The Discursive Construction of Identities On- and Offline: Personal - group - collective
Edited by Birte Bös, Sonja Kleinke, Sandra Mollin and Nuria Hernández
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 78] 2018
► pp. 133–152

Identity and metapragmatic acts in a student forum discussion thread

| University of Helsinki, Finland
Starting with the idea that identity is dynamic, interactive and contextualised, the present study offers a close reading of a discussion thread from an online student discussion forum. During the discussion, the interactants both construct identity with language and use identity in order to frame and evaluate their own and others’ contributions. The discussion turns into a metapragmatic debate in which the interactants move away from the topic of the discussion to talk about who is allowed to say what on the topic. The analysis shows how a participant whose identity is flexible is challenged by the other participants, for whom her identity is defined from the beginning, as she self-positions as an outsider. Her contributions are evaluated against this positioning, and for the others her identity resists change.
Keywords: identity construction, metapragmatic acts, positioning, self-positioning, negotiation, evaluation, online interaction, discussion forum
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Constructing identity
    • 2.1Identity and interaction
    • 2.2Identity and metapragmatics
  • 3. Material: The Student Room
  • 4.Identity and metapragmatic acts in the Freshers Week discussion
    • 4.1Laurelei’s self-positioning as continental
    • 4.2Laurelei’s self-positioning as British
    • 4.3Laurelei’s self-positioning as someone with a dual nationality
  • 5.Discussion and conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 23 July 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.78.06tan
References (47)
References
Primary sources
The Student Room. Retrieved from: [URL]
Secondary sources
Adrianson, L., & Hjelmquist, E. (1991). Group processes in face-to-face and computer-mediated interaction. Behaviour and Information Technology 10(4): 281–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Antaki, C., & Widdicombe, S. (1998). Identity as an achievement and as a tool. In C. Antaki, & S. Widdicombe (Eds.), Identities in Talk (pp. 1–14). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Avgerinakou, A. (2003). Flaming in computer-mediated interaction. In C. B. Grant (Ed.), Rethinking Communicative Interaction (pp. 273–293). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bamberg, M., De Fina, A., & Schiffrin, D. (2011). Discourse and identity construction. In S. J. Schwartz, K. Luyckx, & V. L. Vignoles (Eds.), Handbook of Identity Theory and Research (pp. 377–396). Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baron, N. S. (1984). Computer mediated communication as a force in language change. Visible Language, XVIII(2): 118–141.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J., & Rampton, B. (2011). Language and superdiversity. Diversities, 13(2): 1–22.Google Scholar
Bolander, B. (2012). Disagreements and agreements in personal/diary blogs: A closer look at responsiveness. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(12): 1607–1622. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolander, B., & Locher, M. A. (2010). Constructing identity on Facebook: Report on a pilot study. In K. Junod, & D. Maillat (Eds.), Performing the Self (pp. 165–185). Tübingen: Narr Francke.Google Scholar
Bou-Franch, P., & Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P. (2014). Conflict management in massive polylogues: A case study from YouTube. Journal of Pragmatics, 73(1): 19–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruckman, A. (2002). Studying the amateur artist: A perspective on disguising data collected in human subjects research on the internet. Ethics and Information Technology, 4(3): 217–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5): 585–614. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caffi, C. (1998). Metapragmatics. In J. L. Mey (Ed.), Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics (pp. 581–586). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Culpeper, J., & Haugh, M. (2014). Pragmatics and the English Language. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1): 43–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Cillia, R., Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (1999). The discursive construction of national identities. Discourse & Society, 10(2): 149–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Fina, A. (2003). Identity in Narrative: A Study of Immigrant Discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). Group identity, narrative and self-representations. In A. De Fina, D. Schiffrin, & M. Bamberg (Eds.), Discourse and Identity (pp. 351–375). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delahunty, J. (2012). ‘Who am I?’ Exploring identity in online discussion forums. International Journal of Educational Research, 53: 407–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derks, D., Bos, A. E. R., & von Grumbkow, J. (2007). Emoticons and social interaction on the internet: The importance of social context. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1): 842–849. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dresner, E., & Herring, S. C. (2010). Functions of the nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and illocutionary force. Communication Theory, 20(3): 249–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garcia, A. C., & Jacobs, J. B. (1999). The eyes of the beholder: Understanding the turn-taking system in quasi-synchronous computer-mediated communication. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32(4): 337–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Georgakopoulou, A. (2003). Computer-mediated communication. In J. Verschueren, J -O. Östman, J. Blommaert, & C. Bulcaen (Eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graham, S. L. (2007). Disagreeing to agree: Conflict, (im)politeness and identity in a computer-mediated community. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(4): 742–759. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). A manual for (im)politeness? The impact of the FAQ in electronic communities of practice. In D. Bousfield, & M. A. Locher (Eds.), Impoliteness in Language: Studies on Its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice (pp. 281–304). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hancock, J. T., & Dunham, P. J. (2001). Language use in computer-mediated communication: The role of coordination devices. Discourse Processes, 31(1): 91–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S. (2000). Maintaining the virtual community: Use of politeness strategies in an email discussion group. In L. Pemberton, & S. Shurville (Eds.), Words on the Web: Computer Mediated Communication (pp. 69–78). Exeter/Portland, OR: Intellect Books.Google Scholar
Haugh, M. (2010). When is an email really offensive? Argumentativity and variability in evaluations of impoliteness. Journal of Politeness Research, 6(1): 7–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiltz, S. R., Johnson, K., & Turoff, M. (1986). Experiments in group decision making: Communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. Human Communication Research, 13(2): 225–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hübler, A., & Bublitz, W. (2007). Introducing metapragmatics in use. In W. Bublitz, & A. Hübler (Eds.), Metapragmatics in Use (pp. 1–26). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kleinke, S., & Bös, B. (2015). Intergroup rudeness and the metapragmatics of its negotiation in online discussion fora. In M. Locher, B. Bolander, & N. Höhn (Eds.), Relational Work in CMC. Special issue of Pragmatics, 25(1): 47–71.Google Scholar
(2018). Indeterminate us and them: The complexities of referentiality, identity and group construction in a public online discussion. In B. Bös, S. Kleinke, N. Hernández, & S. Mollin (eds.), The Discursive Construction of Identities: Personal–Group–Collective (pp. 153–176). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kopytowska, M. (2012). Editorial: Critical perspectives on ideology, identity and interaction. CADAAD, 5(2): i–xiv.Google Scholar
Locher, M. A. (2010). Introduction: Politeness and impoliteness in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Politeness Research, 6(1): 1–5. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Locher, M. A., & Bolander, B. (2015). Humour in microblogging: Exploiting linguistic humour strategies for identity construction in two Facebook focus groups. In M. Dynel, & J. Chovanec (Eds.), Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions (pp. 135–155). Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Locher, M. A., & Hoffmann, S. (2006). The emergence of the identity of a fictional expert advice-giver in an American internet advice column. Text & Talk, 26(1): 67–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L., & Zyzik, E. (2008). Online interactions and L2 learning: Some ethical challenges for L2 researchers. In S. Sieloff Magnan (Ed.), Mediating Discourse Online (pp. 331–355). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Page, R. (2011). Stories and Social Media: Identities and Interaction. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tanskanen, S -K. (2007). Metapragmatic utterances in computer-mediated interaction. In W. Bublitz, & A. Hübler (Eds.), Metapragmatics in Use (pp. 87–106). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). ”Eipäs nyt puhuta omia”: Metapragmaattiset kommentit opiskelijoiden keskustelupalstoilla. In M -L. Helasvuo, M. Johansson, & S -K. Tanskanen (Eds.), Kieli verkossa: Näkökulmia digitaaliseen vuorovaikutukseen (pp. 51–74). Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
Thompson, D., & Filik, R. (2016). Sarcasm in written communication: Emoticons are efficient markers of intention. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(2): 105–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, T. (1998). Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Verschueren, J. (2000). Notes on the role of metapragmatic awareness in language use. Pragmatics, 10(4): 439–456. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waugh, L. R. (2008). Shifting linguistic identities in interaction: The case of a French-English bilingual. In M. Mantero, P. Miller, & J. Watzke (Eds.), Readings in Language Studies: Volume 1: Language Across Disciplinary Boundaries (pp. 211–227). St Louis, MO: International Society for Language Studies, Inc.Google Scholar
(2010). Pronominal choice in French conversational interaction: Indices of national identity in identity acts. In S -K. Tanskanen, M -L. Helasvuo, M. Johansson, & M. Raitaniemi (Eds.), Discourses in Interaction (pp. 81–100). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R., de Cillia, R., Reisigl, M., & Liebhart, K. (1999). The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Zhao, S., Grasmuck, S., & Martin, J. (2008). Identity construction on Facebook: Digital empowerment in anchored relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5): 1816–1836. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Pakkala-Weckström, Mari
2023. When your neighbor becomes a threat. Internet Pragmatics 6:2 ► pp. 219 ff. DOI logo
Mullan, Kerry
2022. On the "Dark Side". The European Journal of Humour Research 10:2 ► pp. 96 ff. DOI logo
Schneider, Klaus P.
2022. Referring to Speech Acts in Communication: Exploring Meta-Illocutionary Expressions in ICE-Ireland. Corpus Pragmatics 6:2 ► pp. 155 ff. DOI logo
Johansson, Marjut, Sanna-Kaisa Tanskanen & Jan Chovanec
2021. Practices of Convergence and Controversy in Digital Discourses. In Analyzing Digital Discourses, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Tanskanen, Sanna-Kaisa
2021. “Stop Arguing”: Interventions as Metapragmatic Acts in Discussion Forum Interaction. In Analyzing Digital Discourses, ► pp. 219 ff. DOI logo
Tanskanen, Sanna-Kaisa
2024. Chapter 4. “Ding ding ding we have a hypocrite!”. In The Pragmatics of Hypocrisy [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 343], ► pp. 74 ff. DOI logo
Xie, Chaoqun, Francisco Yus & Hartmut Haberland
2021. Introduction. In Approaches to Internet Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 318], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.