Chapter published in:
The Discursive Construction of Identities On- and Offline: Personal - group - collective
Edited by Birte Bös, Sonja Kleinke, Sandra Mollin and Nuria Hernández
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 78] 2018
► pp. 133152
References

References

Primary sources

The Student Room

Secondary sources

Adrianson, L., & Hjelmquist, E.
(1991) Group processes in face-to-face and computer-mediated interaction. Behaviour and Information Technology 10(4): 281–296. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Antaki, C., & Widdicombe, S.
(1998) Identity as an achievement and as a tool. In C. Antaki, & S. Widdicombe (Eds.), Identities in Talk (pp. 1–14). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Avgerinakou, A.
(2003) Flaming in computer-mediated interaction. In C. B. Grant (Ed.), Rethinking Communicative Interaction (pp. 273–293). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bamberg, M., De Fina, A., & Schiffrin, D.
(2011) Discourse and identity construction. In S. J. Schwartz, K. Luyckx, & V. L. Vignoles (Eds.), Handbook of Identity Theory and Research (pp. 377–396). Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baron, N. S.
(1984) Computer mediated communication as a force in language change. Visible Language, XVIII(2): 118–141.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J., & Rampton, B.
(2011) Language and superdiversity. Diversities, 13(2): 1–22.Google Scholar
Bolander, B.
(2012) Disagreements and agreements in personal/diary blogs: A closer look at responsiveness. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(12): 1607–1622. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bolander, B., & Locher, M. A.
(2010) Constructing identity on Facebook: Report on a pilot study. In K. Junod, & D. Maillat (Eds.), Performing the Self (pp. 165–185). Tübingen: Narr Francke.Google Scholar
Bou-Franch, P., & Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P.
(2014) Conflict management in massive polylogues: A case study from YouTube. Journal of Pragmatics, 73(1): 19–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bruckman, A.
(2002) Studying the amateur artist: A perspective on disguising data collected in human subjects research on the internet. Ethics and Information Technology, 4(3): 217–231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K.
(2005) Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5): 585–614. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caffi, C.
(1998) Metapragmatics. In J. L. Mey (Ed.), Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics (pp. 581–586). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Culpeper, J., & Haugh, M.
(2014) Pragmatics and the English Language. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davies, B., & Harré, R.
(1990) Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1): 43–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Cillia, R., Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R.
(1999) The discursive construction of national identities. Discourse & Society, 10(2): 149–173. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Fina, A.
(2003) Identity in Narrative: A Study of Immigrant Discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Group identity, narrative and self-representations. In A. De Fina, D. Schiffrin, & M. Bamberg (Eds.), Discourse and Identity (pp. 351–375). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Delahunty, J.
(2012) ‘Who am I?’ Exploring identity in online discussion forums. International Journal of Educational Research, 53: 407–420. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Derks, D., Bos, A. E. R., & von Grumbkow, J.
(2007) Emoticons and social interaction on the internet: The importance of social context. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1): 842–849. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dresner, E., & Herring, S. C.
(2010) Functions of the nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and illocutionary force. Communication Theory, 20(3): 249–268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, A. C., & Jacobs, J. B.
(1999) The eyes of the beholder: Understanding the turn-taking system in quasi-synchronous computer-mediated communication. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32(4): 337–367. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Georgakopoulou, A.
(2003) Computer-mediated communication. In J. Verschueren, J -O. Östman, J. Blommaert, & C. Bulcaen (Eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Graham, S. L.
(2007) Disagreeing to agree: Conflict, (im)politeness and identity in a computer-mediated community. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(4): 742–759. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) A manual for (im)politeness? The impact of the FAQ in electronic communities of practice. In D. Bousfield, & M. A. Locher (Eds.), Impoliteness in Language: Studies on Its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice (pp. 281–304). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hancock, J. T., & Dunham, P. J.
(2001) Language use in computer-mediated communication: The role of coordination devices. Discourse Processes, 31(1): 91–110. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S.
(2000) Maintaining the virtual community: Use of politeness strategies in an email discussion group. In L. Pemberton, & S. Shurville (Eds.), Words on the Web: Computer Mediated Communication (pp. 69–78). Exeter/Portland, OR: Intellect Books.Google Scholar
Haugh, M.
(2010) When is an email really offensive? Argumentativity and variability in evaluations of impoliteness. Journal of Politeness Research, 6(1): 7–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hiltz, S. R., Johnson, K., & Turoff, M.
(1986) Experiments in group decision making: Communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. Human Communication Research, 13(2): 225–252. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hübler, A., & Bublitz, W.
(2007) Introducing metapragmatics in use. In W. Bublitz, & A. Hübler (Eds.), Metapragmatics in Use (pp. 1–26). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kleinke, S., & Bös, B.
(2015) Intergroup rudeness and the metapragmatics of its negotiation in online discussion fora. In M. Locher, B. Bolander, & N. Höhn (Eds.), Relational Work in CMC. Special issue of Pragmatics, 25(1): 47–71.Google Scholar
(2018) Indeterminate us and them: The complexities of referentiality, identity and group construction in a public online discussion. In B. Bös, S. Kleinke, N. Hernández, & S. Mollin (eds.), The Discursive Construction of Identities: Personal–Group–Collective (pp. 153–176). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kopytowska, M.
(2012) Editorial: Critical perspectives on ideology, identity and interaction. CADAAD, 5(2): i–xiv.Google Scholar
Locher, M. A.
(2010) Introduction: Politeness and impoliteness in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Politeness Research, 6(1): 1–5. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Locher, M. A., & Bolander, B.
(2015) Humour in microblogging: Exploiting linguistic humour strategies for identity construction in two Facebook focus groups. In M. Dynel, & J. Chovanec (Eds.), Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions (pp. 135–155). Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Locher, M. A., & Hoffmann, S.
(2006) The emergence of the identity of a fictional expert advice-giver in an American internet advice column. Text & Talk, 26(1): 67–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L., & Zyzik, E.
(2008) Online interactions and L2 learning: Some ethical challenges for L2 researchers. In S. Sieloff Magnan (Ed.), Mediating Discourse Online (pp. 331–355). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Page, R.
(2011) Stories and Social Media: Identities and Interaction. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tanskanen, S -K.
(2007) Metapragmatic utterances in computer-mediated interaction. In W. Bublitz, & A. Hübler (Eds.), Metapragmatics in Use (pp. 87–106). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) ”Eipäs nyt puhuta omia”: Metapragmaattiset kommentit opiskelijoiden keskustelupalstoilla. In M -L. Helasvuo, M. Johansson, & S -K. Tanskanen (Eds.), Kieli verkossa: Näkökulmia digitaaliseen vuorovaikutukseen (pp. 51–74). Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
Thompson, D., & Filik, R.
(2016) Sarcasm in written communication: Emoticons are efficient markers of intention. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(2): 105–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, T.
(1998) Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Verschueren, J.
(2000) Notes on the role of metapragmatic awareness in language use. Pragmatics, 10(4): 439–456. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Waugh, L. R.
(2008) Shifting linguistic identities in interaction: The case of a French-English bilingual. In M. Mantero, P. Miller, & J. Watzke (Eds.), Readings in Language Studies: Volume 1: Language Across Disciplinary Boundaries (pp. 211–227). St Louis, MO: International Society for Language Studies, Inc.Google Scholar
(2010) Pronominal choice in French conversational interaction: Indices of national identity in identity acts. In S -K. Tanskanen, M -L. Helasvuo, M. Johansson, & M. Raitaniemi (Eds.), Discourses in Interaction (pp. 81–100). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R., de Cillia, R., Reisigl, M., & Liebhart, K.
(1999) The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Zhao, S., Grasmuck, S., & Martin, J.
(2008) Identity construction on Facebook: Digital empowerment in anchored relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5): 1816–1836. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Xie, Chaoqun, Francisco Yus & Hartmut Haberland
2021.  In Approaches to Internet Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 318],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.