Chapter published in:
Persuasion in Public Discourse: Cognitive and functional perspectives
Edited by Jana Pelclová and Wei-lun Lu
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 79] 2018
► pp. 21–42

Patterns of persuasion in Hungarian medical discourse domain from the 16th and 17th centuries

This study focuses on the persuasive patterns and conceptual domains of 16th and 17th century Hungarian medical recipes. From a theoretical perspective, the study is set in a functional cognitive framework, with heavy reliance on historical pragmatics and sociolinguistics. From a methodological perspective, the research is based on the concept of genre as script, which is an organized form of everyday knowledge, and on the metonymic model of speech acts. From the qualitative analysis of eight historical and representative collections of recipes, three main conclusions were drawn. First, persuasion can be best described with the help of persuasive intent within linguistic. Second, persuasion cannot be interpreted without its sociocultural context. Last, certain persuasive patterns can be delineated that are closely associated with the norms of the analyzed genre.
Keywords: early Hungarian medical recipes, linguistic patterns of persuasion, medical discourse domain, conceptual categories, script, genre, scenario model of speech acts
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 08 August 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.79.02kun
References

Sources

AM = Váradi Lencsés, György: Ars Medica cca 1577 In: Attila Szabó T. & Zsolt Bíró (2000), Gramma 3.1. & 3.2.Google Scholar
HP = Házi patika cca 1663 In: Hoffmann, Gizella (ed.) 1989 Medicusi és borbélyi mesterség. Régi magyar ember- és állatorvosló könyvek. Radvánszky Béla gyűjtéséből. Szeged: József Attila Tudományegyetem Irodalomtörténeti Tanszék. pp.227–246.Google Scholar
KP = Váradi Vásárhelyi, István: Kis patika 1628 In: Gizella Hoffmann (1989), pp.211–225. Google Scholar
MBM = Becskereki Váradi Szabó, György: Medicusi és borbélyi mesterség [1668–1703] In: Gizella Hoffmann (1989), pp.341–434.Google Scholar
MOR = Mindenféle orvosságoknak rendszedésse 2nd part of the 17th c. In: Gizella Hoffmann (1989), pp.459–472.Google Scholar
OK = Orvosságos könyv 1677 In: Margit S. Sárdi (fc.). Recept korpusz, Ms. 690. [http://​receptek​.elte​.hu/].Google Scholar
OLO = Török, János: Orvoskönyv lovak orvoslása before 1619 In: Gizella Hoffmann (1989), pp.77–171.Google Scholar
TOK = Szentgyörgyi, János: Testi orvosságok könyve cca 1619 In: Gizella Hoffmann (1989), pp.173–201.Google Scholar

References

Alonso-Almeida, Francisco, and Mercedes Cabrera-Abreu
2002 “The Formulation of Promise in Medieval English Medical Recipes: A Relevance-Theoretic Approach.” Neophilologus 86: 137–154.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle
[1984] “Rhetoric”. In The Rhetoric and Poetics of Aristotle, trans. by W. Rhys Roberts, 1–218. New York: The Modern Library.Google Scholar
Benke, József
2007 Az orvostudomány története [The History of Medicine]. Budapest: Medicina Könyvkiadó.Google Scholar
Eamon, William
1994 Science and the Secrets of Nature: Books of Secters in Medieval and Early Modern Culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Halmari, Helena, and Tuija Virtanen
(eds) 2005 Persuasion across Genres. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, Tony
1990 Popular Medicine in Thirteenth-Century England: Introduction and Texts. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.Google Scholar
Jones, Claire
1998 “Formula and Formulation: ‘Efficacy Phrases’ in Medieval English Medical Manuscripts.” Neuphilologische Mitteilungen. 99: 199–209.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H.
1997 “Persuasion by Inference. Analysis of a Party Political Broadcast.” In Political Linguistics. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 11, ed. by Jan Blommaert, and Chris Bulcean, 121–137.Google Scholar
Keszler, Borbála
2011 “A meggyőzés eszközei a régi magyar orvosi receptekben [Persuasion in Early Medical Recipes].” Magyar Orvosi Nyelv 11 (1): 22–26.Google Scholar
Kinneavy, James L.
1971 A Theory of Discourse: The Aims of Discourse. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentices-Hall.Google Scholar
Kuna, Ágnes
2011 A 16–17. századi magyar nyelvű orvosi recept szövegtipológiai és pragmatikai vizsgálata funkcionális-kognitív keretben [The Discourse Typologycal and Pragmatic Investigation of 16th and 17th cxe in Functional Cognitive Framework]. Dissertation. Budapest: Eötvös Loránd University.Google Scholar
2013 “Stylistic Patterns in 16th and 17th c. Medical Recipes. Hystorical Stylistic Analysis from Cognitive Linguistic Perspective.” Studia Linguistica Hungarica (Formerly Annales Sectio Linguistica). The Linguistic Journal of the Faculty of Humanities Eötvös Loránd University, 28: 167–192.Google Scholar
2014a “Strategies of Persuasion in a 16th century Hungarian Remedy Book.” In Specialisation and Variation in Language Corpora, ed. by Ana Diáz Negrillo, and Francisco Javier Díaz Pérez, 187–213. Frankfurt (Main): Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2014b “Illness-Conceptions in the Persuasive Sections of Hungarian Medical Recipes from the 16th and17th centuries.” In Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, Volume II, ed. by Martin Hilpert, and Susanne Flach, 51–68. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
2016 “Genre in a Functional Cognitive Framework: Medical Recipe as a Genre in 16th and 17th Century Hungarian.” In Genre in Language, Discourse and Cognition, ed. by Ninke Stukker, Wilbert Spooren, and Gerard Steen, 193–224. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
2017 “Die sprachlichen Muster von Anweisungen in ungarischen medizinischen Rezepten des 16.–17. Jahrhunderts.” In Sprachgeschichte und Medizingeschichte. Texte – Termini – Interpretationen, ed. Jörg Riecke, 195–210. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018., Nyelv, meggyőzés, gyógyítás. A meggyőzés nyelvi mintázatai a 16–17. századi orvosi receptben. [Languages, persuasion, healing. Patterns of persuasion in 16th and 17th c. medical recipe.] Budapest: Tinta Kiadó.
McVaugh, Michael Rogers
1997 “Two Montpellier Recipe Collections.” Manuscripta 20: 175–180.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Gerald R.
1980 “On Being Persuaded: Some Basic Distinctions.” In Persuasion: New Directions in Theory and Research, ed. by Michael E. Roloff, and Gerald Miller, 11–28. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Oláh, Andor
1986 “Újhold, új király!” (A magyar népi orvoslás életrajza) [Hungarian Medical Ethnography]. Budapest: Gondolat Kiadó.Google Scholar
Ortak, Nuri
2004 Persuasion. Zur textlinguistischen Beschreibung eines dialogischen Strategiemusters. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Östman, Jan-Ola
2005 “Persuasion as Implicit Anchoring. The Case of Collocations.” In Persuasion across Genres, ed. by Helena Halmari, and Tuija Virtanen, 183–212. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pahta, Päivi and Irma Taavitsainen
2004 “Vernacularisation of Scientific and Medical Writing in its Sociohistorical Context.” In Medical and Scientific Writing in Late Medieval English, ed. by Irma Taavitsainen, and Päivi Pahta, 1–19. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Panther, Klaus-Uwe, and Linda L. Thornburg
1997 “Speech Act Metonymies.” In Discourse and Perspective in Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Wolf-Andreas Liebert, Gisela Redeker, and Linda Waugh, 205–219. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
1998 “A Cognitive Approach to Inferencing in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 30 (6): 755–769.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Petty, Richard E., and John T. Cacioppo
1986 Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, José, and Wilbert Spooren
1997 “Perspective, Subjectivity and Modality from a Cognitive Linguistic Point of View.” In Discourse and Perspective in Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Wolf-Andreas Liebert, Gisele Redeker, and Linda Waugh, 85–112. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sinha, Chris
2001 “The Epigenesis of Symbolization.” In Modeling Cognitive Development in Robotic Systems, ed. by Christian Balkenius, Jordan Zlatev, Hideki Kozima, Kerstin Dautenhahn, and Cynthia Breazeal, 85–95. Lund: Lund University Cognitive Studies.Google Scholar
Stannard, Jerry
1982 “Rezeptliteratur als Fachliteratur.” In Studies on Medieval Fachliteratur, ed. by William Eamon (Scripta 6), 59–73. Brussels: Omirel.Google Scholar
Szabó T. Attila, and Zsolt Bíró
2000 Ars Medica Electronica: Váradi Lencsés György (1530–1593) CD-ROM. BioTár Electronic, Gramma 3.1. & 3.2. MTA – EME – BDF – VE, Budapest/Kolozsvár/Szombathely/Veszprém.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma
2001 “Middle English Recipes: Genre Characteristics, Text Type Features and Underlying Ttraditions of Writing.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 2 (1): 85–113.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, and Andreas H. Jucker
2010 Trends and Developments in Historical Pragmatics. In Historical Pragmatics, ed. by Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen, 3–30. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, and Päivi Pahta
1998 “Vernacularisation of Medical Writing in English: A Corpus-Based Study of Scholastic Style.” Early Science of Medicine 3: 157–185.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vanderbiesen, Jeroen
2016 Mixed viewpoints and the quotative-reportive cline in German: Reported speech and reportive evidentiality. In Viewpoint and the Fabric of Meaning. Form and Use of Viewpoint Tools across Languages and Modalities ed. by Barbara Dancygier, Wei-lun Lu and Arie Verhagen, 41–91. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Varga, Katalin
(ed.) 2011 A szavakon túl. Kommunikáció és szuggesztió az orvosi gyakorlatban [Suggestive Communication in Medicine]. Budapest: Medicina Kiadó.Google Scholar
Virtanen, Tuija, and Helena Halmari
2005 “Persuasion across Genres Emerging Perspectives.” In Persuasion across Genres, ed. by Helena Halmari, and Tuija Virtanen, 3–24. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossrefGoogle Scholar