Chapter published in:

Persuasion in Public Discourse: Cognitive and functional perspectives
Edited by Jana Pelclová and Wei-lun Lu
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 79] 2018
► pp. 43–62

Chapter 2. Construction of the speaker’s persuasive image in public discourse

Classical rhetoric revisited

Janja Žmavc

This chapter presents Greco-Roman conceptualizations of rhetorical ethos in order to show that classical rhetoric, when properly reconstructed in the framework of its (relevant) sociocultural context, can fruitfully contribute to the research and analysis of persuasive strategies in contemporary public discourse. A reconstruction of a model for analysis of rhetorical ethos is proposed and applied to selected contemporary data. The analysis presents a case study of persuasion through character in formal addresses of Slovenian Prime Minister-designates. Two issues are explored in particular: (1) the relevance of rhetorical ethos as a persuasive strategy and (2) the characteristics of rhetorical ethos in these speeches.

Keywords: classical rhetoric, rhetorical ethos, authority, means of persuasion, public discourse, argumentation, political speech

Published online: 08 August 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.79.03zma

References

Sources

Transcription of the first extraordinary session of the Slovenian National Assembly, November 9 2004:https://www.dz-rs.si/wps/portal/Home/deloDZ/seje/evidenca?mandat=IV&=sz&=DD6F1A725B2FD4A3C1256F4D00463C1E%20(retrieved%20July%2024,%202018.) (retrieved February 9, 2009).

Transcription of the first extraordinary session of the Slovenian National Assembly, November 7 2008:https://www.dz-rs.si/wps/portal/Home/deloDZ/seje/evidenca?mandat=V&=sz&=779AC0B7B10CC0B2C1257501002FA8A3 (retrieved February 9, 2009).

References

Amossy, Ruth

2001 “Ethos at the Crossroads of Disciplines: Rhetoric, Pragmatics, Sociology.” Poetics Today 22 (1): 1–23.

2009 “Argumentation in Discourse: A Socio-discursive Approach to Arguments.” Informal Logic 29 (3): 252–267.

Aristotle

(2006) Art of Rhetoric, trans. by John Henry Freese. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London: Harvard University Press.

Blair, Anthony J.

2012 “Argumentation as Rational Persuasion.” Argumentation 26: 71–81.

Booth, Wayne C.

2004 The Rhetoric of RHETORIC: The Quest for Effective Communication. Malden, Oxford, Carlton: Blackwell Publishing.

Brinton, Alan

1986 “Ethotic argument.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 3: 245–258.

Buxton, Richard G. A.

1982 Persuasion in Greek Tragedy. A Study of Peitho. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cicero. 19541

(1999repr.). Rhetorica ad Herennium. With an English Translation by Harry Caplan. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London: Harvard University Press.

Conley, Thomas M.

1990 Rhetoric in the European Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Corbett, Edward P. J., and Robert J. Connors

1999 Classi1cal Rhetoric for the Modern Student, 4th ed. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fahnestock, Jeanne

1999 Rhetorical Figures in Science. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Halmari, Helena, and Tuija Virtanen

(eds.) 2005 Persuasion across Genres. A Linguistic Approach. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Isocrates

1963 Isocrates with an English Translation in Three Volumes by George Norlin. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Jamieson, Kathleen Hall, and Karlyn Kohrs Campbell

1982 “Rhetorical Hybrids: Fusion of Generic Elements.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 68 (2): 146–157.

Kennedy, George A.

1963 The Art of Persuasion in Greece. New Jersey, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

1972 The Art of Rhetoric in the Roman World 300 B.C.–A. D. 300. New Jersey, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

1998 Comparative Rhetoric. An Historical and Cross-cultural Introduction. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

Kalyvas, Andreas

2009 “The Democratic Narcissus: The Agonism of the Ancients Compared to that of the (Post)moderns.” In Law and Agonistic Politics, ed. by Andrew Schaap, 15–41. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.

Kohrs Campbell, Karlyn, and Kathleen Hall Jamieson

1985 “Inaugurating the Presidency.” Presidential Studies Quaterly 15 (2): 394–411.

Leff, Michael

2003 “Rhetoric and Dialectic in Martin Luther King’s ‘Letter from Birmingham Jail.” In Anyone Who Has a View: Theoretical Contributions to the Study of Argumentation, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, J. Anthony Blair, Charles A. Willard, and A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, 255–268. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

2009 “Perelman, ad Hominem Argument, and Rhetorical Ethos.” Argumentation 23: 301–311.

Lunsford, Andrea A., Kirt H. Wilson, and Rosa A. Eberly

(eds.) 2009 The SAGE Handbook of Rhetorical Studies. London and New Delhi: SAGE Publications.

May, James M.

1988 Trials of Character. The Eloquence of Ciceronian Ethos. Chapel Hill and London: The University of North Carolina Press.

O’Keefe, Daniel J.

2002 Persuasion: Theory and Research, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Östman, Jan-Ola

2005 “Persuasion as Implicit Anchoring: The Case of Collocations.” In Persuasion across Genres. A Linguistic Approach, ed. by Helena Halmari, and Tuija Virtanen, 183–212. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Plato

1925 Lysis. Symposium. Gorgias. Volume III, trans. by Walter R. M. Lamb, Loeb Classical Library 166. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Rubinelli, Sara

2009 Ars Topica: The Classical Technique of Constructing Arguments from Aristotle to Cicero. Argumentation Library, 15. Dordrecht: Springer.

Tindale, Cristopher W.

1999 Acts of Arguing. A Rhetorical Model of Argument. Albany: State University of New York Press.

2004 Rhetorical Argumentation: Principles of Theory and Practice. London: Sage.

van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst

2004 A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, Francisca A. Snoeck, Bart Verheij, and Jean H. M. Wagemans

(eds.) 2014 Handbook of Argumentation Theory. Dordrecht: Springer.

Verhagen, Arie

2007 Constructions of Intersubjectivity: Discourse, Syntax, and Cognition. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

Verschueren, Jef

1999 Understanding Pragmatics. London: Arnold.

2012 Ideology in Language Use. Pragmatic Guidelines for Empirical Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Walton, Douglas

1998 Ad Hominem Arguments. Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press.

Walton, Douglas, Christopher Reed, and Fabrizio Macagno

2008 Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Wisse, Jakob

1989 Ethos and Pathos from Aristotle to Cicero. Amsterdam: Hakkert.

Žmavc, Janja

2009 “Govorniške zvrsti in sredstva prepričevanja v zgodnji rimski retoriki: metaretorika v nastajanju [Branches of Oratory and Rhetorical Means of Persuasion in Early Roman Rhetoric].” Annales. Series Historia et Sociologia 19 (1): 1–14.

2012 “The Ethos of Classical Rhetoric: From Epieikeia to Auctoritas.” In Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory: Twenty Exploratory Studies, Vol. 22, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, and Bart Garssen, 181–191. Dordrecht: Springer.