Chapter 3
Metaphor as a (de-)legitimizing strategy in leadership discourse
The language of crisis in Winston Churchill’s Cold War speeches
This chapter investigates Churchill’s Cold War speeches as a case of how cognitive and corpus linguistics may serve as a useful tool for analyzing how political leaders legitimize their agendas via linguistic means. We find that Churchill’s rhetoric makes extensive use of the source domains person, journey, and building. The argumentative purpose is at least twofold. First, journey and building metaphors give positive value to the country’s prospects. Second, the journey metaphor is found to co-occur with personification, with the purpose of seeking partnership between the United States and the United Kingdom. We conclude by discussing how political leaders linguistically represent and conceptually frame a crisis, especially via metaphorical means, convincing their people of the usefulness of certain proposals and thus legitimizing their agendas, with Churchill as a representative example.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Analytical framework
- 3.Data and method
- 4.Findings and analysis
- 4.1Personification in Churchill’s Cold War speeches
- 4.2
journey metaphor in Churchill’s Cold War speeches
- 4.3
building metaphor in Churchill’s Cold War speeches
- 5.Conclusion
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
References
-
Corpus and database consulted
References (34)
References
Cameron, Lynne, and Graham Low. 1999. Researching and Applying Metaphor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cap, Piotr. 2006. Legitimization in Political Discourse. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2004. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. New York: Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2005. Politicians and Rhetoric. New York: Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chilton, Paul Anthony. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Churchill, Winston S. 1930. A Roving Commission: My Early Life. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coulson, Seana. 2008. “Framing and Blending in Persuasive Discourse.” In Frames, Corpora and Knowledge Representation, ed. by Rema Rossini Favretti, 33–42. Bologna: Bolonia University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crespo-Fernández, Eliecer. 2013. “Words as Weapons for Mass Persuasion.” Text & Talk 33 (3): 311–330. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Edelman, Murray. 1977. Political Language: Words That Succeed and Policie That Fail. New York: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner. 2002. The Way We Think. New York: Basic Books.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, Charles. 1982. “Frame semantics.” In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, ed. by The Linguistic Society of Korea, 111–137. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geis, Michael L. 1987. The Language of Politics. New York: Springer-Verlag. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goatly, Andrew. 1997. The Language of Metaphors. New York: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hart, Christopher. 2014. Discourse, Grammar and Ideology. London: Bloomsbury.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johnson, Mark. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jowett, Garth, and Victoria O'Donnel. 1992. Propaganda and Persuasion. London and Newbury Park: Sage.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kilgarriff, Adam, Pavel Rychlý, Pavel Smrž, and David Tugwell. 2004. “The Sketch Engine.” In Proceedings of the Eleventh EURALEX International Congress, ed. by Geoffrey Williams, and Sandra Vessier, 105–116. Lorient, France: Universite de Bretagne-Sud.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kövecses, Zoltan. 2002. Metaphor: A practical Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, George. 1993. “The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor.” In Metaphor and Thought, ed. by Andrew Ortony, 202–251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, George. 2004. Don't Think of an Elephant. White River Junction: Chelsea Green Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, George. 2008. The Political Mind. New York: Penguin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, George, and Mark Turner. 1989. More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. London: University of Chicago Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lu, L.Wei-lun. 2008. “From Textual Prompts to Cognitive Models: A Context-oriented Perspective on Metaphor Interpretation in Taiwanese Presidential Speeches.” Language and Linguistics 9 (2): 341–358.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lu, L.Wei-lun, and Kathleen Ahrens. 2008. “Ideological Influence on BUILDING Metaphors in Taiwanese Presidential Speeches.” Discourse & Society 19 (3): 383–408. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lu, Wei-lun. 2017. “Religion and Worldview in Metaphor Use: Cultural Conceptualisations of Death in Taiwanese Buddhist and Christian Eulogistic Idioms.” In Advances in Cultural Linguistics ed. by Farzad Sharifian, 49–64. New York: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Macmillan Dictionary. 2009–2015
Pelclová, Jana. 2010. Persuasive Strategies in Advertising Discourse. A Lexico-grammatical and Socio-pragmatic Analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Brno: Masaryk University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. 1981. “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice.” Science 211 (4481): 453–458. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Dijk, Teun. 1995. “Discourse Analysis as Ideology Analysis.” In Language and Peace, ed. by Christina Shaffner, and Anita L. Wendon, 17–33. Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Leeuwen, Theo, and Ruth Wodak. 1999. “Legitimizing Immigration Control:A Discourse-historical Analysis.” Discourse Studies 10 (1): 83–118. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Corpus and database consulted
Selected Speeches of Winston Churchill. 2011. [URL].
The British National Corpus, version 3 (BNC XML Edition). 2007. Distributed by Oxford University Computing Services on behalf of the BNC Consortium.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Berrocal, Martina & Aleksandra Salamurović
Kashiha, Hadi
2022.
On persuasive strategies: Metadiscourse practices in political speeches.
Discourse and Interaction 15:1
► pp. 77 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Salama, Amir H. Y.
2022.
Cross-textual reconceptualisation of the deictic space of “victory” in political discourse: Donald Trump versus Joseph Biden.
Discourse and Interaction 15:1
► pp. 101 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.