Chapter published in:

Persuasion in Public Discourse: Cognitive and functional perspectives
Edited by Jana Pelclová and Wei-lun Lu
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 79] 2018
► pp. 227–258

Chapter 10. Persuasion in academic discourse

Cross-cultural variation in Anglophone and Czech academic book reviews

Olga Dontcheva-Navrátilová

This chapter studies persuasion in academic book reviews from a cross-cultural perspective. After discussing the rhetorical structure of book reviews, the study explores the strategic means used by the authors of reviews to represent themselves as expert members of the disciplinary community, show authorial involvement, and open a dialogic space for the negotiation of their opinions and views. The analysis of citation practices, personal structures, and evaluation acts is carried out on a corpus of book reviews published in the linguistics journals Journal of English for Academic Purposes and Slovo a Slovesnost. The findings indicate that while both Anglophone and Czech linguists exploit these linguistic means for persuasive purposes, there is cross-cultural variation in their rate of occurrence and rhetorical functions.

Keywords: personal pronouns, persuasion, genre, book reviews, academic discourse, evaluative acts, citations, cross-cultural variation, rhetorical moves

Published online: 08 August 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.79.11don

References

Bennett, Karen

2009 “English academic style manuals: A survey.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 8: 43–54.

Bednárek, Monika

2008 Evaluation in Media Discourse: Analysis of a Newspaper Corpus. London/New York: Continuum.

Bhatia, Vijay K.

1993 Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.

2004 Worlds of Written Discourse. A Genre-Based View. New York: Continuum.

Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson

1987 Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bülow-Møller

2005 “Persuasion in business negotiation.” In Persuasion across Genres, ed. by Helena Halmari and Tuija Virtanen, 27–58. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Chamonikolasová, Jana

2005 “Comparing the Structures of Academic Texts Written in English and Czech.” In Slovak Studies in English 1, ed. by Maria Huttová, 77–84. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského.

Clark, Herbert C.

1992 Arenas of Language Use. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Clyne, Michael

1987 “Cultural Differences in the Organisation of Academic Texts.” Journal of Pragmatics 11: 211–247.

Čmejrková, Svetla

1996 “Academic Writing in Czech and in English.” In Academic Writing, ed. by Eija Ventola, and Anna Mauranen, 137–152. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Čmejrková, Svetla, and František Daneš

1997 “Academic Writing and Cultural Identity: The Case of Czech Academic Writing.” In Culture and Styles of Academic Discourse, ed. by Anna Duzsak, 40–62. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Diani, Giuliana

2009 “Reporting and Evaluation in English Book Review Articles: A Cross-Disciplinary Study.” In Academic Evaluation: Review Genres in University Settings, ed. by Ken Hyland and Giuliana Diani, 87–104. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Dontcheva-Navrátilová, Olga

2012 “Cross-cultural Differences in the Construal of Authorial Voice in the Genre of Diploma Theses.” In Insights into Academic Genres, ed. by Carol Berkenkotter, Vijay K. Bhatia, and Maurizio Gotti, 301–328. Bern: Peter Lang.

2013a “Authorial Presence in Academic Discourse: Functions of Author-reference Pronouns.” Linguistica Pragensia 23 (1): 9–30.

2013b “The Changing Face of Czech Academic Discourse.” In The Semiperiphery of Academic Writing, ed. by Karen Bennett, 39–61. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

2015 “Cross-cultural Variation in Citation Practices: A Comparative Analysis of Citations in Czech English-medium and International English-medium Linguistics Journals.” In English as a Scientific and Research Language, ed. by Ramon Plo Alastrué, and Carmen Pérez-Llantada, 185–205. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.

Duszak, Anna

1997 “Cross-cultural Academic Communication: A Discourse Community View.” In Culture and Styles of Academic Discourse, ed. by Anna Duzsak, 11–39. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter,

Felber, Lynette

2002 “The Book Review: Scholarly and Editorial Responsibility.” Journal of Scholarly Publishing 33 (3): 166–172.

Fløttum, Kjersti, Trine Gedde-Dahl and Torodd Kinn

2006 Academic Voices Across Languages and Disciplines. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Flowerdew, John

2000 “Discourse Community, Legitimate Peripheral Participation, and the Nonnative-English-speaking Scholar.” TESOL Quarterly 34 (1): 127–150. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3588099.

Flowerdew, Lynne

2004 “The Argument for Using English Specialized Corpora to Understand Academic and Professional Language.” In Discourse in the Professions, ed. by Ulla Connor, and Thomas Upton, 11–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

2012 “Grammar and the Research Article.” In Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ed. by Carol Chapelle, 2394–2399. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Gea Valor, Luisa M.

2000 A Pragmatic Approach to Politeness and Modality in the Book Review Articles. SELL Monograph. Valencia. Universitat de Valencia.

Giannoni, Davide S.

2009 “Negotiating Research Values across Review Genres: A Case Study in Applied Linguistics.” In Academic Evaluation: Review Genres in University Settings, ed. by Ken Hyland and Giuliana Diani, 17–33. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Goffman, Erving

1967 Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face to Face Behavior. Garden City: New York.

Gosden, Hugh

1993 “Discourse Functions of Subject in Scientific Research Articles.” Applied Linguistics 14: 56–75.

Gotti, Maurizio

2009 “Introduction.” In Communality and Individuality in Academic Discourse, ed. by Maurizion Gotti, 9–21. Bern: Peter Lang.

Halliday, Michael A. K.

1985 An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.

Harwood, Nigel

2005 “ ‘We Do Not Seem to Have a Theory … The Theory I Present Here Attempts to Fill This Gap’: Inclusive and Exclusive Pronouns in Academic Writing.” Applied Linguistics 26: 343–375.

2009 “An Interview-based Study of the Functions of Citations in Academic Writing across Two Disciplines.” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (3): 497–518.

Hewings, Ann, Theresa Lillis, and Dimitra Vladimirou

2010 “Who’s Citing Whose Writings? A Corpus Based Study of Citations as Interpersonal Resource in English Medium National and English Medium International Journals.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9: 102–115.

Hogan, Michael

2013 “Persuasion in the Rhetorical Tradition.” In The SAGE Handbook of Persuasion: Developments in Theory and Practice, ed. by James Price Dillard and Lijiang Shen, 2–19. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Hunston, Susan and Geoff Thompson

(eds) 1999 Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hyland, Ken

1998 Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

1999 “Academic Attribution: Citation and the Construction of Disciplinary Knowledge.” Applied Linguistics 20 (3): 341–367.

2000 Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Harlow, England: London/New York: Pearson Education.

2001 “Humble Servants of the Discipline? Self-mention in Research Articles.” English for Specific Purposes 18: 207–226.

2002 “Authority and Invisibility: Authorial Identity in Academic Writing.” Journal of Pragmatics 34: 1091–1112.

2004a “A Convincing Argument: Corpus Analysis and Academic Persuasion.” In Discourse in the Professions, ed. by Ulla Connor and Thomas A. Upton, 87–112. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

2004b Disciplinary Discourses. Michigan: University of Michigan.

2005 “Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse.” Discourse Studies 7 (2): 173–192.

2008 “Persuasion, Interaction and the Construction of Knowledge: Representing Self and Others in Research Writing.” International Journal of English Studies 8 (2): 1–23.

Hyland, Ken and Giuliana Diani

(eds) 2009 Academic Evaluation: Review Genres in University Settings. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Hyland, Ken and Carmen Sancho Guinda

(eds.) (2012) Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Jucker, Andreas

1997 “Persuasion by Inference: Analysis of a Party Political Broadcast.” In Political Linguistics, Special issue of Belgian Journal of Linguistics 11, ed. by Jan Blummaert, and Chris Bulcaen, 121–137.

Kress, Gunther

1985 Linguistic Processes in Sociocultural Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kreutz, Heinz and Annette Harres

1997 “Some Observations on the Distribution and Function of Hedging in German and English Academic Writing.” In Culture and Styles of Academic Discourse, ed. by Anna Duzsak, 181–201. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Kuhn, Thomas

1970 The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Kuo, Chih-Hua

1999 “The Use of Personal Pronouns: Role Relationships in Scientific Journal Articles.” English for Specific Purposes 18 (2): 121–138.

Livnat, Zohar

2012 Dialogue, Science and Academic Writing. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Lorés Sanz Rosa

2009 “(Non-)critical Voices in the Reviewing of History Discourse: A Cross-cultural Study of Evaluation.” In Academic Evaluation: Review Genres in University Settings, ed. by Ken Hylandm and Giuliana Diani, 143–160. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Martin, James and Peter White

2005 The Language of Evaluation. Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave.

Martin, James R.

2000 “Beyond Exchange: Appraisal Systems in English.” In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, ed. by Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson, 142–175. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mauranen, Anna

1993 “Contrastive ESP Rhetoric: Metatext in Finnish-English Economic Texts.” English for Specific Purposes 12 (3): 3–22.

Moreno, Anna I., and Lorena Suarez

2008 “A Study of Critical Attitude across English and Spanish Academic Book Reviews.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 7 (1): 15–26.

2009 “Academic Book Reviews in English and Spanish: Critical Comments and Rhetorical Structure.” In Academic Evaluation: Review Genres in University Settings, ed. by Ken Hyland, and Giuliana Diani, 161–178. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Motta-Roth, Desirée

1996 “Same Genre, Different Discipline: A Genre-based Study of Book-reviews in Academe.” The ESPecialist 17 (2): 99–131.

1998 “Discourse Analysis and Academic Book Reviews: A Study of Text and Disciplinary Cultures.” In Genre Studies in English for Academic Purposes, ed. by Immaculada Fortanet, Santiago Posteguillo, Juan C. Palmer, and Juan F. Coll, 29–58. Castello de la Plana: Publicacions de la Universitat Jaume I.

Mur-Dueňas, Pilar

2007 “I/we Focus on …: A Cross-cultural Analysis of Self-mentions in Business Management Research Articles.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 6 (2): 143–162.

2009 “Citation in Business Management Research Articles.” In Cross-Linguistic and Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Academic Discourse, ed. by Eija Suomela-Salmi, and Fred Dervin, 49–60. Amsterdam/New York: John Benjamins.

Petersen, Margrethe, and Philip Shaw

2002 “Language and Disciplinary Differences in a Biliterate Context.” World Englishes 21 (3): 357–374.

Povolná, Renata

2012 “Cross-cultural Variation in the Degree of Dialogicality in Research Articles: On Some Text-organizing Devices.” In Coherence and Cohesion in English Discourse, by Dontcheva-Navrátilová, Olga, Renata Jančaříková, Gabriela Miššíková, and Renata Povolná, 29–58. Brno: Masaryk University.

Salager-Mayer, Francoise, and María Angeles Alcaraz Ariza

2007 “Negative Appraisals in Academic Book Reviews: A Cross-linguistic Approach.” In Intercultural Aspects of Specialized Communication, 2nd ed., ed. by Christopher N. Candlin, and Maurizio Gotti, 149–171. Bern: Peter Lang.

Sancho Guinda, Carmen and Ken Hyland

2014 Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Shaw, Peter

2004 “How Do We Recognise Implicit Evaluation in Academic Book Reviews.” In Academic Discourse – New Insights into Evaluation, ed. by Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti, and Elena Tognini Bonelli, 121–140. Bern: Peter Lang.

Shaw, Philip

2006 “Evaluative Language in Evaluative and Promotional Genres.” In Variation in Business and Economic Discourse: Diachronic and Genre Perspactives, ed. by Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti, Marina Dosena, and Belinda Crawford, 152–165. Roma: Officina Edizioni.

2009 “The Lexis and Grammar of Explicit Evaluation in Academic Book Reviews, 1913 and 1993.” In Academic Evaluation: Review Genres in University Settings, ed. by Ken Hyland, and Giuliana Diani, 217–235. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Shaw, Philip, and Irena Vassileva

2009 “Co-evolving Ecademic Rhetoric across Culture: Britain, Bulgaria, Denmark, Germany in the 20th Century.” Journal of Pragmatics 4 (2): 290–305.

Sperber, Dan, Fabrice Clément, Christophe Heintz, Olivier Mascaro, Hugo Mercier, Gloria Origgi, and Deirdre Wilson

2010 “Epistemic Vigilance.” Mind and Language 25: 359–393.

Stašková, Jaroslava

2005 “Options of Identity: Authorial Presence in Research Articles Abstracts.” In Slovak Studies in English 1, ed. by Maria Huttová, 201–207. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského.

Sudková, Marcela

. 2012. “Vyjadřování interpersonální funkce v českých a anglických odborných textech. Kontrastivní studie.” [Expressing the interpersonal function in Czech and English academic texts. A contrastive study.] Časopis pro moderní filologie 2012 (1): 31–42.

Swales, John M.

1990 Genre Analysis. English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

2004 Research Genres. Exploration and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tang, Ramona, and Suganthi John

1999 “The ‘I’ in Identity: Exploring Writer Identity in Student Academic Writing through the First Person Pronoun.” English for Specific Purposes 18: 23–39.

Thieme, Katja

2010 “Constitutive Rhetoric as an Aspect of Audience Design: The Public Texts of Canadian Suffragists.” Written Communication 27 (1): 36–56.

Thompson, Geoff

2001 “Interaction in Academic Writing: Learning to Argue with the Reader.” Applied Linguistics 22 (1): 58–78.

Thompson, Geoff and Susan Hunston

1999 “Evaluation: An introduction.” In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, ed. by Susan Hunston, and Geoff Thompson, 1–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Vanderbiesen, Jeroen

2016 “Mixed Viewpoints and the Quotative-reportive Cline in German: Reported Speech and Reported Eventuality.” In Viewpoint and the Fabric of Meaning, ed. by Barbara Dancygier, Wei-lun Lu, and Arie Verhagen, 41–91. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.

Vassileva, Irena

1998 “Who Am I/Who Are We in Academic Writing?” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 8 (2): 163–192.

Verhagen, Arie

2016 “Introduction: On tools for Weaving Meaning Out of Viewpoint Threads.” In Viewpoint and the Fabric of Meaning, ed. by Barbara Dancygier, Wei-lun Lu, and Arie Verhagen, 1–10. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.

Virtanen, Tuija, and Helena Halmari

2005 “Persuasion across Genres: Emerging Perspectives.” In Persuasion across Genres, ed. Helena Halmari, and Tuija Virtanen, 3–24. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Cited by

Cited by other publications

Povolná, Renata

2019. CROSS-CULTURAL VARIATION IN THE EXPRESSION OF PERSUASIVE POWER IN THE GENRE OF TECHNICAL MANUALS: THE CASE OF DIRECTIVES. Discourse and Interaction 12:1 ► pp. 47 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 june 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.