Cover not available
Part of
Doing Politics: Discursivity, performativity and mediation in political discourse
Edited by Michael Kranert and Geraldine Horan
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 80] 2018
► pp. 385–406

Chapter 16
Red lines and rash decisions

Syria, metaphor and narrative

Obama’s “red lines” metaphor nearly triggered a military intervention in Syria in the summer of 2013. This chapter questions the work that metaphor does in shaping understandings and conduct in international affairs. The term is used by political leaders to express likely behavioural consequences to international rivals and allies and to domestic publics. We explore what difference in diplomatic practice it makes to speak of a line, and a red one, as well as how such metaphors trigger or sustain narratives, and how narratives interact with metaphors. In the context of conflict in Syria we examine the trajectory and remediation of the red lines metaphor, taking as an empirical nexus a series of officials’ speeches in September 2013 by Kerry, Power, Lavrov and other political leaders. We find that the red line initially trapped Obama, leading to rhetorical shifts, before a trajectory shift from the red line to the path forward in mid-September as the US and Russia reach a deal to eliminate the Assad regime’s chemical weapons. The study brings together approaches from International Relations and Cognitive Linguistics to open up theoretical reflection on the function of metaphor and narrative in steering sense-making in diplomatic practice. The political significance of the analysis is to bring into question what alternative metaphors Obama could have used in the first place.
Keywords: metaphor, narrative, foreign policy, Barack Obama, Syria, persuasion, strategic communication
Article outline
  • Introduction: How do narrative and metaphor help explain foreign policy?
  • Metaphors make a difference: The red line compared to possession of WMD
  • Framework and methodology: An ontology of persuasion, strategic narrative and strategic metaphor
  • Analysis: The tale of the line and the path
  • Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 December 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.80.16fer
References (51)
References
Atkins, S., J. Clear, and N. Ostler. 1992. “Corpus Design Criteria.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 7(1): 1–16.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words, ed. by James O. Urmson, and Marina Sbisa. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Belnap, N., and M. Green. 1994. “Indeterminism and the Thin Red Line.” Philosophical Perspectives, 8: 365–388.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bentley, M. 2014. “Strategic Taboos: Chemical Weapons and US Foreign Policy.” International Affairs 90(5): 1033–1048.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berenskoetter, F. 2012. “Parameters of a National Biography,” European Journal of International Relations, Online First, 16 October.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J. S. 1990. Acts of Meaning. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bush, G. W. 2003. The State of the Union Address, 28 January. Available at: [URL] (accessed 2 April 2015).
Buzan, B., O. Wœver, and J. de Wilde. 1998. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, CO and London: Lynne Reinner Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Carver, T., and J. Pikalo (eds) 2008. Political Language and Metaphor: Interpreting and Changing the World. London: Routledge.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. 2005. Politics and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Chilton, P. A. 1996. Security Metaphors: Cold War Discourse from Containment to Common House. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. 1989. (Revised ed.) Memoires for Paul de Man. New York: Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Entman, R. M. 2009. Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and US Foreign Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ferrari, F. 2007a. “Metaphor at Work in the Analysis of Political Discourse: Investigating a ‘Preventive War’ Persuasion Strategy.” Discourse & Society 18: 603–625.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007b. “G. W. Bush’s Public Speeches to the Nation: Exploiting Emotion in Persuasion.” In Discourse and Contemporary Social Change, ed by N. Fairclough, G. Cortese, and P. Ardizzone, 381–404. BERNA, Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2011. “Bush versus Blair: Keywords Heading the Nation.” In Issues in Political Discourse Analysis, ed. by Samuel Gyasi Obeng, 149–176. New York: Nova Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
2012. “’Through a Woman’s Eyes’: Narratives of the Nation: Gender as and Beyond a Category of Analysis.” Journal of Multicultural Discourses 7(3): 243–262.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013. Non solo metafore. (De)costruzione della strategia persuasiva di G. W. Bush Jr. Padova: libreriauniversitaria.it edizioni.Google Scholar
2018. Metaphor and Persuasion in Strategic Communication: Sustainable Perspectives. New York: Routledge.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Freedman, L. 2006. “Networks, Culture, and Narratives.” Adelphi Papers Series No. 45.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gladstone, R., and C. J. Chivers. 2013. Forensic Details in U.N. Report Point to Assad’s Use of Gas. New York Times, 16 September. Available at: [URL] [Accessed 1 July 2016].
Goldberg, J. 2016. The Obama Doctrine. The Atlantic, April. Available at: [URL] (accessed 1 July 2016).
Hoskins, A. 2004. Televising War: From Vietnam to Iraq. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Kovecses, Z. 2002. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krebs, R. R., and P. T. Jackson. 2007. “Twisting Tongues and Twisting Arms: The Power of Political Rhetoric.” European Journal of International Relations, 13(1): 35–66.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. 1992. “Metaphor and War: The Metaphor System used to Justify War in the Gulf.” In Thirty Years of Linguistic Evolution: Studies in Honour of Rene Dirven on the Occasion of his Sixtieth Birthday. ed. by M. Putz, 463–481. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company: Matsunaga Institute for Peace.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993. “The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor.” In Metaphor and Thought (2nd edn), ed. by A. Ortony, 202–251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995. “Metaphor, Morality, and Politics, Or, Why Conservatives Have Left Liberals in the Dust.” Social Research 62(2): 177–213.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson. 2003 [1980]. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lizza, R. 2011. The Consequentialist. The New Yorker, 2 May. Available at: [URL] (accessed 2 April 2015)
Marks, M. P. 2011. Metaphors in International Relations Theory. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McGregor, R., and D. Dombey. 2011. “Foreign Policy: A Reticent America.” Financial Times, March 23. Available at: [URL] (accessed 8 February 2015).
Mean, L. J. 2012. “Discourses, Discursive Processes, Intertextuality and Identity.” Journal of Multicultural Discourses 7(2): 145–152.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miskimmon, A., B. O’Loughlin, and L. Roselle. 2013. Strategic Narratives: Communication Power and the New World Order. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2015. “Great Power Politics and Strategic Narratives of War.” In Shaping Societies for War: Public Support, Strategic Narratives and the War in Afghanistan, 2001 until the Present, ed. by B. De Graaf, G. Dimitriu, and J. Ringsmose, 57–76. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(eds). 2017. Forging the World: Strategic Narratives and International Relations. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moretti, F. 1996. Modern Epic: the World-System from Goethe to García Márquez. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Musolff, A. 2010. Metaphor, Nation and the Holocaust: The Concept of the Body Politic, London: Routledge.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Obama, B. 2013. Full Transcript: President Obama’s press conference with Swedish Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt in Stockholm. The Washington Post, 4 September. Available at: [URL] (accessed 5 March 2017).
2012. Remarks by the President to the White House Press Corps, 20 August. Available at: [URL] (accessed 2 April 2015).
2010. The National Security Strategy of the United States. May. Available at: [URL] (accessed 3 April 2015).
Partington, A. 2006. “Metaphors, Motifs and Similes across Discourse Types: Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (CADS) at Work.” In Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy, ed. by A. Stefanowitsch, and S. Th. Gries, 267–304. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2004). “Corpora and Discourse, a Most Congruous Beast.” In Corpora and Discourse, ed. by A. Partington, J. Morley, and L. Haarman. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Price, M. 2015. Free Expression, Globalism, and the New Strategic Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roselle, L., A. Miskimmon, and B. O’Loughlin. 2014. “Strategic Narrative: A New Means to Understand Soft Power.” Media, War & Conflict 7(1): 70–84.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. 1962. “Meaning and Speech Acts.” The Philosophical Review 71(4): 423–432.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steen, G. 1999. “From Linguistic to Conceptual Metaphor In Five Steps.” In Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by R. W. Gibbs, and G. J. Steen, 57–77. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, M. 2001. Words and Phrases: Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Todorov, T. 1977. The Poetics of Prose. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Tognini-Bonelli, E. 2001. Corpus Linguistics at Work. Amsterdam and New York, NY: John Benjamins Publishing.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, M. C. 2003. “Words, Images, Enemies: Securitization and International Politics.” International Studies Quarterly 47(4): 511–531.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Ferrari, Federica
2023. Media reverberations on the ‘red line’: Syria, metaphor and narrative in news media. Media, War & Conflict 16:3 ► pp. 325 ff. DOI logo
Ullmann, Stefanie
2020. Chapter 5. “Today, the long Arab winter has begun to thaw”. In The Language of Crisis [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 87], ► pp. 137 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.