Chapter 16
Red lines and rash decisions
Syria, metaphor and narrative
Obama’s “red lines” metaphor nearly triggered a military intervention in Syria in the summer of 2013. This chapter questions the work that metaphor does in shaping understandings and conduct in international affairs. The term is used by political leaders to express likely behavioural consequences to international rivals and allies and to domestic publics. We explore what difference in diplomatic practice it makes to speak of a line, and a red one, as well as how such metaphors trigger or sustain narratives, and how narratives interact with metaphors. In the context of conflict in Syria we examine the trajectory and remediation of the red lines metaphor, taking as an empirical nexus a series of officials’ speeches in September 2013 by Kerry, Power, Lavrov and other political leaders. We find that the red line initially trapped Obama, leading to rhetorical shifts, before a trajectory shift from the red line to the path forward in mid-September as the US and Russia reach a deal to eliminate the Assad regime’s chemical weapons. The study brings together approaches from International Relations and Cognitive Linguistics to open up theoretical reflection on the function of metaphor and narrative in steering sense-making in diplomatic practice. The political significance of the analysis is to bring into question what alternative metaphors Obama could have used in the first place.
Article outline
- Introduction: How do narrative and metaphor help explain foreign policy?
- Metaphors make a difference: The red line compared to possession of WMD
- Framework and methodology: An ontology of persuasion, strategic narrative and strategic metaphor
- Analysis: The tale of the line and the path
- Conclusion
-
Notes
-
References
References
Atkins, S., J. Clear, and N. Ostler
1992 “
Corpus Design Criteria.”
Literary and Linguistic Computing 7(1): 1–16.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Austin, J. L.
1962 How to Do Things with Words, ed. by
James O. Urmson, and
Marina Sbisa. New York: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Belnap, N., and M. Green
1994 “
Indeterminism and the Thin Red Line.”
Philosophical Perspectives, 8: 365–388.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bentley, M.
2014 “
Strategic Taboos: Chemical Weapons and US Foreign Policy.”
International Affairs 90(5): 1033–1048.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berenskoetter, F.
2012 “
Parameters of a National Biography,”
European Journal of International Relations, Online First
16 October.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bruner, J. S.
1990 Acts of Meaning. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bush, G. W.
2003 The State of the Union Address 28 January. Available at:
[URL] (accessed 2 April 2015).
Buzan, B., O. Wœver, and J. de Wilde
1998 Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, CO and London: Lynne Reinner Publishers, Inc.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carver, T., and J. Pikalo
(eds) 2008 Political Language and Metaphor: Interpreting and Changing the World. London: Routledge.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Charteris-Black, J.
2005 Politics and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chilton, P. A.
1996 Security Metaphors: Cold War Discourse from Containment to Common House. New York: Peter Lang.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Derrida, J.
1989 (Revised ed.)
Memoires for Paul de Man. New York: Columbia Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Entman, R. M.
2009 Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and US Foreign Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ferrari, F.
2007a “
Metaphor at Work in the Analysis of Political Discourse: Investigating a ‘Preventive War’ Persuasion Strategy.”
Discourse & Society 18: 603–625.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ferrari, F.
2007b “
G. W. Bush’s Public Speeches to the Nation: Exploiting Emotion in Persuasion.” In
Discourse and Contemporary Social Change, ed by
N. Fairclough,
G. Cortese, and
P. Ardizzone, 381–404. BERNA, Peter Lang.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ferrari, F.
2011 “
Bush versus Blair: Keywords Heading the Nation.” In
Issues in Political Discourse Analysis, ed. by
Samuel Gyasi Obeng, 149–176. New York: Nova Publishers Inc.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ferrari, F.
2012 “
’Through a Woman’s Eyes’: Narratives of the Nation: Gender as and Beyond a Category of Analysis.”
Journal of Multicultural Discourses 7(3): 243–262.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ferrari, F.
2013 Non solo metafore. (De)costruzione della strategia persuasiva di G. W. Bush Jr. Padova: libreriauniversitaria.it edizioni.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ferrari, F.
2018 Metaphor and Persuasion in Strategic Communication: Sustainable Perspectives. New York: Routledge.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Freedman, L.
2006 “
Networks, Culture, and Narratives.”
Adelphi Papers Series No. 45.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gladstone, R., and C. J. Chivers
2013 Forensic Details in U.N. Report Point to Assad’s Use of Gas.
New York Times 16 September. Available at:
[URL] [Accessed 1 July 2016].
Goldberg, J.
2016 The Obama Doctrine.
The Atlantic,
April. Available at:
[URL] (accessed 1 July 2016).
Hoskins, A.
2004 Televising War: From Vietnam to Iraq. London: Continuum.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kovecses, Z.
2002 Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krebs, R. R., and P. T. Jackson
2007 “
Twisting Tongues and Twisting Arms: The Power of Political Rhetoric.”
European Journal of International Relations, 13(1): 35–66.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, G.
1993 “
The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor.” In
Metaphor and Thought (2nd edn), ed. by
A. Ortony, 202–251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, G.
1995 “
Metaphor, Morality, and Politics, Or, Why Conservatives Have Left Liberals in the Dust.”
Social Research 62(2): 177–213.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson
2003 [1980] Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lizza, R.
2011 The Consequentialist.
The New Yorker 2 May. Available at:
[URL] (accessed 2 April 2015)
Marks, M. P.
2011 Metaphors in International Relations Theory. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McGregor, R., and D. Dombey
2011 “
Foreign Policy: A Reticent America.”
Financial Times,
March 23. Available at:
[URL] (accessed 8 February 2015).
Mean, L. J.
2012 “
Discourses, Discursive Processes, Intertextuality and Identity.”
Journal of Multicultural Discourses 7(2): 145–152.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Miskimmon, A., B. O’Loughlin, and L. Roselle
2013 Strategic Narratives: Communication Power and the New World Order. New York: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Miskimmon, A., B. O’Loughlin, and L. Roselle
2015 “
Great Power Politics and Strategic Narratives of War.” In
Shaping Societies for War: Public Support, Strategic Narratives and the War in Afghanistan, 2001 until the Present, ed. by
B. De Graaf,
G. Dimitriu, and
J. Ringsmose, 57–76. London: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Miskimmon, A., B. O’Loughlin, and L. Roselle
(eds) 2017 Forging the World: Strategic Narratives and International Relations. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moretti, F.
1996 Modern Epic: the World-System from Goethe to García Márquez. London: Verso.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Musolff, A.
2010 Metaphor, Nation and the Holocaust: The Concept of the Body Politic, London: Routledge.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Obama, B.
2013 Full Transcript: President Obama’s press conference with Swedish Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt in Stockholm.
The Washington Post 4 September. Available at:
[URL] (accessed 5 March 2017).
Obama, B.
2012 Remarks by the President to the White House Press Corps 20 August. Available at:
[URL] (accessed 2 April 2015).
Obama, B.
2010 The National Security Strategy of the United States.
May. Available at:
[URL] (accessed 3 April 2015).
Partington, A.
2006 “
Metaphors, Motifs and Similes across Discourse Types: Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (CADS) at Work.” In
Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy, ed. by
A. Stefanowitsch, and
S. Th. Gries, 267–304. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Partington, A.
(
2004) “
Corpora and Discourse, a Most Congruous Beast.” In
Corpora and Discourse, ed. by
A. Partington,
J. Morley, and
L. Haarman. Bern: Peter Lang.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Price, M.
2015 Free Expression, Globalism, and the New Strategic Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roselle, L., A. Miskimmon, and B. O’Loughlin
2014 “
Strategic Narrative: A New Means to Understand Soft Power.”
Media, War & Conflict 7(1): 70–84.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Searle, J.
1962 “
Meaning and Speech Acts.”
The Philosophical Review 71(4): 423–432.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stubbs, M.
2001 Words and Phrases: Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Todorov, T.
1977 The Poetics of Prose. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Williams, M. C.
2003 “
Words, Images, Enemies: Securitization and International Politics.”
International Studies Quarterly 47(4): 511–531.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
Ferrari, Federica
2023.
Media reverberations on the ‘red line’: Syria, metaphor and narrative in news media.
Media, War & Conflict 16:3
► pp. 325 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.