Cover not available
Part of
Migration and Media: Discourses about identities in crisis
Edited by Lorella Viola and Andreas Musolff
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 81] 2019
► pp. 115–136

Chapter 5
Aspects of threat construction in the Polish anti-immigration discourse

Proximization Theory (PT) (Cap 2008, 2010, 2013, 2017; among others) is a cognitive-critical model that accounts for the ways in which the discursive construction of closeness and remoteness can be manipulated in the political sphere and bound up with fear, security and conflict. This article applies PT in the domain of state political discourse in today's Poland, outlining strategies whereby anti-immigration stance and policies are legitimized by discursively constructed fear appeals and other coercion patterns. It demonstrates how the ‘emerging’, ‘growing’, ‘gathering’ threats – physical as well as ideological – are construed by the Polish right-wing government, who thus claim their right to oppose EU immigration agreements and pursue strict anti-immigration measures.
Keywords: anti-immigration discourse, Poland, Law & Justice Party, threat construction, legitimization, proximization
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Discourse space: Cognitive representations and the forcing of worldviews
    • 2.1Deictic Space Theory (DST)
    • 2.2Proximization Theory (PT)
  • 3.Threat construction in the L&J discourse: From ‘cultural unbelonging’ to ‘terrorist risk’
    • 3.1The corpus for analysis
    • 3.2The US
    • 3.3The THEM
    • 3.4The THEM against US proximization scenario
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 7 March 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.81.06cap
References (26)
References
Cap, Piotr. 2006. Legitimization in Political Discourse: A Cross-disciplinary Perspective on the Modern US War Rhetoric. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
. 2008. “Towards the Proximization model of the analysis of legitimization in political discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 40: 17–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “Axiological aspects of Proximization.” Journal of Pragmatics 42: 392–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Proximization: The Pragmatics of Symbolic Distance Crossing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. The Language of Fear: Communicating Threat in Public Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. “Discourse space theory: Geometry, brain and shifting viewpoints.” Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 3: 78–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chovanec, Jan. 2010. “Legitimation through Differentiation: Discursive Construction of Jacques Le Worm Chirac as an Opponent to Military Action.” In Perspectives in Politics and Discourse, ed. By Urszula Okulska, and Piotr Cap, 61–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cienki, Alan, Bertie Kaal, and Isa Maks. 2010. “Mapping World View in Political Texts Using Discourse Space Theory: Metaphor as an Analytical Tool.” Paper presented at RaAM 8 conference, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Dunmire, Patricia. 2011. Projecting the Future through Political Discourse: The Case of the Bush Doctrine. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Festinger, Leon. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filardo Llamas Laura. 2010. “Discourse Worlds in Northern Ireland: The Legitimisation of the 1998 Agreement.” In Political Discourse and Conflict Resolution. Debating Peace in Northern Ireland, ed. by Katy Hayward, and Catherine O'Donnell, 62–76. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2013. “Committed to the ideals of 1916. The language of paramilitary groups: The case of the Irish republican Army.” Critical Discourse Studies 10: 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filardo Llamas, Laura Bertie Kaal, and Christopher Hart (eds). 2015. Time, Space and Evaluation in Ideological Discourse. Special issue of Critical Discourse Studies (12).Google Scholar
Gavins, Joanna. 2007. Text World Theory: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hart, Christopher. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Discourse, Grammar and Ideology: Functional and Cognitive Perspectives. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Hart, Christopher, and Piotr Cap (eds). 2014. Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Jowett, Garth S., and Victoria O'Donnell. 1992. Propaganda and Persuasion. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Kaal, Bertie. 2012. “Worldviews: The spatial ground of political reasoning in Dutch election manifestos.” CADAAD 6: 1–22.Google Scholar
Levelt, William J. 1989. Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003. Space in Language and Cognition: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mann, William, and Sandra Thompson. 1988. “Rhetorical structure theory: A theory of text organization.” Text 8: 243–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musolff, Andreas. 2016. Political Metaphor Analysis: Discourse and Scenarios. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Werth, Paul. 1999. Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Kisić, Jelena Jorgačević & Aleksandra Salamurović
2023. Migration Discourse in Serbian Media – Analysis of National Dailies Politika, Danas and Vecernje novosti. In The Representation of REFUGEES and MIGRANTS in European National Media Discourses from 2015 to 2017 [Linguistik in Empirie und Theorie/Empirical and Theoretical Linguistics, ], ► pp. 251 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.