Chapter 11
Displaced Ukrainians
Russo-Ukrainian discussions of victims from the conflict zone in Eastern Ukraine
This paper compares several discourse representations of migrants in the British media with the data on Ukrainian displaced people from the conflict zone in Eastern Ukraine. The comparison shows that mainstream media in Russia and Ukraine attempt to depict displaced Ukrainians sympathetically, to win the hearts and minds of the people from the disputed conflict zone and to evoke approval from the international community. Participants in online debates in both countries actively use different techniques of negativisation of the images of migrants. They often either rely on a novel vocabulary for abuses or adapt old disparaging expressions activating cultural prejudices. The paper concludes that Russian and Ukrainian sets of abuse developed during the confrontation reinforce the specifics of the national vision of the conflict development.
Keywords: humanitarianism, negativisation, numerical elements, scroungers, catastrophe scenario, Russia, Ukraine, social media, official media, stereotypes, disparaging expressions
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Data and method
- 3.“Numbers”, “figures”, and “masses”: Are they perceived as a threat?
- 3.1Numbers and figures
- 3.2Masses of water
- 4.Agents of evil as activators of topoi of economic burden and threat
- 4.1Use of “parasite”-terminology
- 4.2Russian stereotypes about Ukrainians
- 4.3New names for terrorists and victims of propaganda
- 5.Representations of victims and aggressors
- 5.1Refugees as victims
- 5.2Blending victims and persecutors
- 5.3IDPs as supporters of the aggressor
- 6.Conclusions
-
Notes
-
References
References (32)
References
BBC news. 2006. “The Press in Ukraine” (31 October), [URL] (last accessed 20 June, 2016).
BBC Monitoring. 2008. “The Press in Russia”. (16 May). [URL]. (last accessed 20 June, 2016)
Cisneros, J. David. 2008. “Contaminated Communities: The Metaphor of ‘Immigrant as Pollutant’ in Media Representations of Immigration.” Rhetoric and Public Affairs 11 (4):569–601.
Dugin, Alexandr. 2005. Поп-культура и знаки времени. [Pop culture and signs of the time]. Saint Petersburg: Amfora.
Gienger, Viola. 2015. “Ukraine's 'Invisible Crisis': 1.5 Million Who Fled War with Russia”, United States Institute of Peace. November 23. [URL] (last accessed 20 May, 2016)
Hamilton, L. David, and Jeffrey W. Sherman. 1994. “Stereotypes”. In Handbook of Social Cognition, Vol.2, ed. by Robert S. Wyer, and Thomas K. Srull, 1–68. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Holyoak, J. Keith, and Peter C. Gordon. 1984. “Information processing and social cognition”. In Handbook of Social Cognition. Vol.1, ed. by Robert S. Wyer, and Thomas K. Srull, 39–71. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
KhosraviNik, Majid, Krzyzanowski, Michal, Wodak, Ruth. 2012 “Dynamics of Representation in Discourse: Immigration in the British Press.” In Migrations: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, ed. by Michi Messer, Renee Schroeder, and Ruth Wodak, 283–295. Vienna: Springer.
Konoplyov, Sergei, and Alexander Urbanskiy. 2016. "Hybrid war in Ukraine: what is next?" Countering Hybrid Threats: Lessons Learned from Ukraine. ed. byIancu Niculae, Andrei Fortuna Cristian Barna Mihaela Teodor. IOS press: Amsterdam, Clifton, Tokyo, Beijing. 96–101.
Magocsi, Paul Robert. 1996. A History of Ukraine. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Musolff, Andreas. 2011. “Migration, Media and ‘Deliberate’ Metaphors.” Metaphoric.de 21: 7–19.
Musolff, Andreas. 2012. “Immigrants and Parasites: ‘The History of a Bio-Social Metaphor’”. In Migrations: Interdisciplinary perspectives ed. by Michi Messer, Renée Schroeder, and Ruth Wodak, 249–258. Vienna: Springer.
Pohl, Walter, and Wodak, Ruth. 2012. “The Discursive Construction of Migrants and Migration.” Migrations: Interdisciplinary perspectives ed. by Michi Messer, Renee Schröder, and Ruth Wodak, 205–212. Vienna: Springer.
Raskin, Victor. 1985. Semantic Mechanisms of Humour. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Reid, Anna. 1997. Borderland. A Journey through the History of Ukraine. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
Rozenko, Pavlo 2015. “Each Temporary Displaced Person to Receive Social Assistance Timely. Press Service of the Ministry of Social Policy”. Web Portal of Ukrainian Government. (7 April). [URL] (last accessed 2 August, 2016)
Stepova, Olena 2016. “Мы и они: что дальше? Вдовы.” [Us and Them: What is Ahead? Widows]. All be Ukraine! (14 March). [URL]. (last accessed 5 August, 2016).
Subtelny, Orest. 1994. (second edition). Ukraine: A History. Toronto: University of Toronto Press/Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies.
TASS, Russian News Agency. 2014. “Russian PM Stresses Need for Assistance to Ukrainian Refugees in Russia”. (24 September). [URL] (last accessed 2 August, 2016)
UHNCR (UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR REFUGEES). 2017a. Opereation: Russian Federation. (24 November). [URL] (last accessed 28 April, 2018).
UNHCR (UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR REFUGEES). 2017b. Ukraine. Fact sheet. (31 December). [URL] (last accessed 28 April, 2018).
Van Dijk, Teun Adrianus. 1991. Racism and the Press: Critical Studies in Racism and Migration. London: Routledge.
Van Dijk, Teun Adrianus. 2012. “The Role of the Press in Reproduction of Racism”. Migrations: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, ed. by Michi Messer, Renée Schroeder, and Ruth Wodak. 15–29. Vienna: Springer.
Wodak, Ruth 1996. “The Genesis of Racist Discourse in Austria since 1989.” In Text and Practices: Readings in CDA, ed. by Caldas-Coulthard Cr, M. Coulthard, 107–128. London: Routledge.
Wodak, Ruth 2011. The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. Basingsoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wodak, Ruth, and Teun Adrianus van Dijk (eds). 2000. Racism at the Top: Parliamentary Discourses on Ethnic Issues in Six European States. Klagenfurt: Drava.
Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer (eds). 2001. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: SAGE.
Zinken, Jörg. 2003. “Ideological Imagination: Intertextual and Correlational Metaphors in Political Discourse”. Discourse and Society 14: 507–523.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Palomino-Manjón, Patricia
2022.
Book Review: Natalia Knoblock (ed.), Language of Conflict: Discourses of the Ukrainian Crisis.
Discourse Studies 24:1
► pp. 135 ff.
Moen-Larsen, Natalia
2020.
“Suitcase – shelling – Russia”: narratives about refugees from Ukraine in Russian media.
East European Politics 36:1
► pp. 124 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.