Chapter 3
European populism(s) as a counter-hegemonic discourse?
The rise of Podemos and M5S in the wake of the crisis
In this chapter, we compare the discourse of Podemos and Movimento Cinque Stelle in order to answer the following question: to what extent do these movements pertain to the same political phenomenon? Based on Laclau’s definition of populism, we provide a “snapshot” of both parties’ discourse between 2012 and 2016 by carrying out a corpus-based analysis that combines lexicography and metaphor analysis. The results show that they display a populist logic and represent two counter-discourses against neoliberal hegemony. However, they also display important differences that could prove to be decisive when it comes to seizing political power and building an alternative to the hegemonic order they challenge, as their recent evolutions have shown.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Populism as a reaction against the hegemonic order in a context of crisis
- Populism as a political logic
- Populism against neoliberal hegemony in times of austerity: “Re-politicizing” and “Re-nationalizing” politics
- Corpus and methods
- Similarities between Podemos and M5S’: Two populist counter-discourses against neoliberal hegemony
- Conclusions
-
Notes
-
References
References (51)
References
Albertazzi, Daniele and Duncan McDonnell. 2015. Populists in Power. New York: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bickerton, Christopher. 2012. European Integration: From Nation-States to Member States. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bickerton, Christopher and Carlo Invernizzi-Accetti. 2014. “Democracy Without Parties? Italy After Berlusconi”. The Political Quarterly 85(1): 23–28. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blyth, Mark and Richard S. Katz. 2005. “From Catch-All Politics to Cartelization: The Political Economy of the Cartel Party.” West European Politics 28: 33–60. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Borriello, Arthur. 2017. “’There is no Alternative’: How Italian and Spanish Leaders’ Discourse Obscured the Political Nature of Austerity”. Discourse & Society. Published Online 28 (3): 241–261. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Borriello, Arthur. 2019. “La vertu du sacrifice collectif. Antagonisme et valeurs morales dans le discours d’austérité en Italie et en Espagne Durant la crise de la zone euro (2010-2013).” Langage et société 166: 75–96. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Canovan, Margaret. 1999. “Trust the People ! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy” Political Studies 47(1): 2–16. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2000. “Metaphor and Vocabulary Teaching in ESP Economics.” English for Specific Purposes 19(2): 149–165. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crouch, Colin. 2004. Post-democracy. Cambridge: Polity![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crouch, Colin. 2011. The Strange Non-Death of Neo-Liberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Prat, Cesareo R.-A. 2015. “Semejanzas y diferencias entre el Movimento 5 stelle y Podemos [Similarities and differences between the Five Star Movement and Podemos].” Società Mutamento Politica. Rivista italiana di sociologia 6(11): 51–74.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Della Sala, Vincenzo. 1997. “Hollowing out and Hardening the State: European Integration and the Italian Economy.” West European Politics 20(1): 14–33. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fairclough, Norman. 2001. “Critical Discourse Analysis as a Method in Social Scientific Research.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer: 121–138. London: SAGE.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fairclough, Norman. 2006. Language and Globalization. London and New York: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gauthier, Gilles. 1994. “La métaphore guerrière dans la communication politique [The war metaphor in political communication].” Recherches en communication 1: 131–147. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gerbaudo, Paolo. 2017. The Mask and the Flag. Populism, Citiznism and Global Protest. London: Hurst and Company.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Glynos, Jason and David Howarth. 2007. Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. New York: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hartleb, Florian. 2015. “Here to Stay: Anti-Establishment Parties in Europe.” European View 14(1): 39–49. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Howarth, David. 2000. Discourse. Buckingham, Philadelphia: Open University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Iglesias, Pablo. 2015. Politics in a Time of Crisis. Podemos and the Future of a Democratic Europe. London & New York: Verso.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kioupkiolis, Alexandros. 2016. “Podemos: the Ambiguous Promises of Left-Wing Populism in Contemporary Spain.” Journal of Political Ideologies 21(2): 99–120. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Knight, Daniel M. and Charles Stewart. 2016. “Ethnographies of Austerity: Temporality, Crisis and Affect in Southern Europe.” History and Anthropology 27(1): 1–18. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2004. “The Populist Challenge.” West European Politics 37(2): 361–378. doi: ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kriesi, Hanspeter, and Takis S. Pappas (eds). 2015. European Populism in the Shadow of the Great Recession. Colchester: ECPR Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Laclau, Ernesto. 1990. New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time. London and New York: Verso.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Laclau, Ernesto. 2005. On Populist Reason. London: Verso.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Laclau, Ernesto and Chantal Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marchart, Oliver. 2007. Post-Foundational Political Thought: Political Difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mair, Peter. 2013. Ruling the Void : The Hollowing-Out of Western Democracy. London : Verso.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mazzolini, Samuele, and Arthur Borriello. 2017. “Southern European Populisms as Counter-Hegemonic Discourses? Podemos and M5S in Comparative Perspective.” In Podemos and the New Political Cycle, ed. by Marco Briziarelli and Oscar Garcia Agustin: 227–254. Palgrave.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mény, Yves and Yves Surel. 2002. “The Constitutive Ambiguity of Populism” In Democracies and the Populist Challenge, ed. by Yves Mény, and Yves Surel: 1–21. Palgrave MacMillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moffitt, Benjamin. 2015. “How to Perform Crisis: A Model for Understanding the Key Role of Crisis in Contemporary Populism.” Government and Opposition 50(2): 189–217. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mouffe, Chantal. 1998. “The Radical Centre. A Politics without Adversary” Soundings 9: 11–23.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mouffe, Chantal. 2005. On the Political. London and New York: Routledge![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mudde, Cas. 2004. “The Populist Zeitgeist.” Government and Opposition 39(4): 542–563. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Muñoz, Jordi and Jacques Fontaine. 2016. “De l’hypothèse populiste à la nouvelle gauche. Origine et bases électorales de Podemos.” Pôle Sud 45: 43–64. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nerghes, Adina, and al. 2015. “A Toxic Crisis: Metaphorizing the Financial Crisis.” International Journal of Communication 9: 106–132.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Prentoulis, Marina and Lasse Thomassen. 2013. “Political Theory in the Square: Protest, Representation and Subjectification.” Contemporary Political Theory. 12(3): 166–184. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rancière, Jacques. 2005. La haine de la démocratie. Paris: La Fabrique. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roux, Christophe. 2016. “Partis émergents en Europe du Sud. Une introduction compare.” Pôle Sud 45: 5–19. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Semenzin, Silvia. 2015. “La comunicación política en tiempos de crisis: una comparación entre Italia y España [Political communication in times of crisis: a comparison between Italy and Spain].” Documentación de las Ciencias de la Información 38: 83–102.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sommerer, Erwan. 2005. “L’école d’Essex et la théorie politique du discours: une lecture “post-marxiste” de Foucault [The Essex school and the political theory of discourse: a “post-Marxist” reading of Foucault].” Raisons Politiques 19: 193–209. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stavrakakis, Yannis and al. 2016. “A New Populism Index at Work: Identifying Populist Candidates and Parties in the Contemporary Greek Context.” European Politics and Society.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Straehle, Carolyn, and al. 1999. “Struggle as metaphor in European Union discourses on unemployment.” Discourse & Society 10(1): 67–99. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Torfing, Jacob and David Howarth (eds). 2005. Discourse Theory in European Politics. Identity, Policy and Governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vaara, Eero. 2014. “Struggles over Legitimacy in the Eurozone Crisis: Discursive Legitimation Strategies and their Ideological Underpinnings.” Discourse & Society 25(4): 500–518. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vittori, Davide. 2017. “Podemos and the Five-star Movement: populist, nationalist or what?” Contemporary Italian Politics 9(2): 142–161. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
White, Michael. 2003. “Metaphor and economics: The case of growth.” English for Specific Purposes 22(2): 131–151. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wodak, Ruth and al. (eds). 2013. Right-Wing Populism in Europe. Politics and Discourse. London and New York: Bloomsbury. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Tarazona Vento, Amparo
2024.
Megaprojects in austerity times: Populism, politicisation, and the breaking of the neoliberal consensus.
Urban Studies ![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Serafis, Dimitris, E. Dimitris Kitis & Stavros Assimakopoulos
Bickerton, Christopher J. & Carlo Invernizzi Accetti
2021.
Technopopulism,
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.