Part of
Political Discourse in Central, Eastern and Balkan Europe
Edited by Martina Berrocal and Aleksandra Salamurović
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 84] 2019
► pp. 3968
References (28)
References
Boćkowski, Daniel, and Dzienkiewicz, Anna. (2007). “Katyń – zbrodnia (nadal) chroniona tajemnicą państwową [Crime still Protected as a Official Secret].” In Oprawcy z Katynia [Executioners from Katyn], ed. by Władimir Abarinow, 311–327. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Znak.Google Scholar
Cienciala, Anna, Natalia Lebedeva, and Wojciech Materski (eds). 2007. Katyn. A Crime Without Punishment. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Duma debates. Available at [URL], retrieved 19 June 2016.
Etkind, Alexander, Rory Finnin et al. 2012. Remembering Katyn. Cambridge UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Gur’janov, Aleksandr. 2015. « Dlja nas vopros o poimennoj reabilitacii ubityx v Katyni ključevoj. » Interview 10th November 2015 [The Key Question for Us is the Question of the Rehabilitation of Each and Every Person Killed in Katyn. Available at [URL], retrieved 19 June 2016.
Komersant 2016. Ольга Шкуренко, Как признавали Катынь Журнал “Коммерсантъ Власть” №15 от 19.04.2010, стр. 44. Available at: [URL], retrieved 19 June 2016.
Komorowski 2015. Available at [URL]
Russia-massacre-court 2012. Available at [URL], retrieved 19 June 2016.
Final ruling 2013. Available at [URL], retrieved 19 June 2016.
Pol’skie politiki 2010. RIA novosti 2010. Available at [URL], retrieved 19 June 2016.
Puškov 2015. Available at [URL], retrieved 19 June 2016.
Putin 2010. Available at [URL], retrieved 19 June 2016.
Rathmayr, Renate. 1996. Pragmatik der Entschuldigungen [Pragmatics of Apologies]. Köln-Weimar: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Rogoża 2012. Available at [URL], retrieved 19 June 2016.
Rome Statue 1998. Available at [URL], retrieved 19 June 2016.
Sejm 2013. Książka 2013: 280–292.Google Scholar
Semicvetov 2011. Available at [URL], retrieved 19 June 2016.
Słownik online. Available at [URL], retrieved 19 June 2016.
Tages-Anzeiger 2001. Tages-Anzeiger 11.04.2001Google Scholar
Uchwała Sejmu 2005. Available at [URL] Disable Redirects= true, retrieved 19 June 2016.
Weiss, Daniel. 2012. “Deputaty ljubjat citaty.” In Rusistika segodnja, vypusk 5: Problemy rečevogo obščenija, ed. by Nina N. Rozanova, 64–75, Moskva: Flinta-Nauka.Google Scholar
. 2013a. “Parliamentary Communication: the Case of the Russian Gosduma.” In Approaches to Slavic Interaction, ed. by Nadine Thielemann, and Peter Kosta, 215–237. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013b. “Parlamentsdebatten in der russischen Gosduma: Originalton vs. Transkript [Parliamentary Debates in the Russian Duma: Original Recording vs. Electronic Transcripts].” Wiener Slawistischer Almanach 72: 103–136.Google Scholar
. 2015. “Chula v Gosdume [Criticism in the Russian Duma].” In Chvala i chula v jazyke i kommunikacii. Sbornik statej [Praise and Criticism in Language and Communication. Collection of Articles], ed. by Ljudmila L. Fedorova, 163–186. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo RGGU.Google Scholar
. 2016. “Quotations in the Russian State Duma: Types and Functions.” In: Contemporary Eastern European Political Discourse, Special issue, ed. by Daniel Weiss. Zeitschrift für Slavistik 1: 184–214.Google Scholar
. 2017. “Implizite Argumentation im politischen Diskurs: Metaphern, Vergleiche, intertextuelle Verweise [Implicit Argumentation in Political Discourse]”. In Im Rhythmus der Linguistik. Festschrift für S. Kempgen [In the Rhythm of Linguistics], ed. by Anna-Maria Mayer and Ljilijana Reinkowski, 465–483. Bamberg: University of Bamberg Press.Google Scholar
Zajavlenie TASS 1990: Available at [URL], retrieved 19 June 2016.
Zajavlenie 2010. Available at [URL], retrieved 19 June 2016.