Cover not available
Part of
Political Discourse in Central, Eastern and Balkan Europe
Edited by Martina Berrocal and Aleksandra Salamurović
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 84] 2019
► pp. 239–264

Chapter 10
Under One Sun?

Semiotic transformation of the cognitive model nation in the Republic of Macedonia on the occasion of the 20th Anniversary of Independence in 2011

The present chapter examines the semiotic transformation of the cognitive model nation as communicated and discursively constructed in commemorative and jubilee speeches concerning the wider context of the 20th Anniversary of Independence in the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM). Theoretically, it draws on the socio-cognitive approach to collective identity and cognitive pragmatics. The methodological framework is based both on quantitative (using corpus linguistics tools) and qualitative analysis. We focused especially on the use of the metonymy “Macedonia”, which is the most frequent term in analysed speeches. Polysemous referentiality and accompanied semiotic events induce, from the point of view of cognitive pragmatics, great contextual effects of this metonymy. Furthermore, ethnonyms, syntactic structures and argumentation patterns are analysed in order to test the hypothesis of discursively erased distinction between different ethnic groups. Finally, the analysis considers possible differentiations caused by participants involved in practices around text, i.e. political figures delivering jubilee speeches.
Keywords: Macedonia, metonymy, collective identity, staatsnation, kulturnation, socio-cognitive approach, cognitive pragmatics, jubilee speeches
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical background
  • 3.Corpus
  • 4.Methodological framework
  • 5.United nation under one sun?
    • 5.1Quantitative findings
    • 5.2macedonia as a cognitive concept and a pragmatic tool
    • 5.3Other social actors in speeches
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 23 July 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.84.10sal
References (32)
References
Anderson, Benedict. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Baker, Paul. 2006. Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London, New Delhi, New York, Sidney: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, and Tony McEnery. 2013. “Sketching Muslims: A Corpus Driven Analysis of Representations Around the World ‘Muslim’ in the British Press 1998–2009.” Applied Linguistics 34 (3): 255–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brdar, Mario. 2009. “Metonymy-induced polysemy and the role of suffixation in its resolution in some Slavic languages.” Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 7(1): 58–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brunnbauer, Ulf. 2002. “The Implementation of the Ohrid Agreement: Ethnic Macedonian Resentments.” JEMIE: Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe, Available at: [URL], <Retrieved: March 2017>.
Brunnbauer, Ulf, and Christian Voss (eds). 2008. Inklusion und Exklusion auf dem Westbalkan [Inclusion and Exclusion in the Western Balkans]: 45. Internationale Hochschulwoche der Südosteuropa-Gesellschaft in Tutzing, 9–13. 10. 2006 München: Sagner.Google Scholar
Ensink, Titus, and Christoph Sauer. 2003. “A Discourse Analytic Approach to the Commemorative Speeches about the Warsaw Uprising.” In The Art of Commemoration. Fifty Years after the Warsaw Uprising, ed. by Titus Ensink, and Christoph Sauer, 19–40. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grassmann, Susanne. 2013. “Word Learning by Exclusion – Pragmatics, Logic and Processing.” In Beyond Words, Content, Context, and Inference, ed. by Frank Liedtke, and Cornelia Schulze, 67–90. Berlin, Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hart, Christopher, and Piotr Cap (eds.). 2014. Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Hart, Christopher. 2014. “Construal Operations in Online Press Reports of Political Protests.” In Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies, ed. by Christopher Hart, and Piotr Cap, 167–188. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Ilievski, S. (: Илиевски, С. 2006. “Скопје – двојазичен или тројазичен град. [Skopje – Bilingual or Trilingual City]” In Јазичната политика и статусот на македонскиот јазик: зборник на трудови од научен собир, одржан на 30–31 март 2005 [Language Policy and Status of the Macedonian Language: Edited Volume with Presentations from the Conference held on March 30–31 2015], ed. by Велковска, С. 96–100. Скопје: Институт за македонски јазик „Крсте Мисирков”.Google Scholar
Koller, Veronika. 2012. “How to Analyse Collective Identity in Discourse: Textual and Contextual Parameters.” Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines 5 (2): 19–38. Available at: [URL], retrieved March 2017.
. 2014a. „Applying Social Cognition Research to Critical Discourse Studies.” In Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies, ed. by Christopher Hart and Piotr Cap, 147–166. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
. 2014b. “Cognitive Linguistics and Ideology.” In The Bloomsbury Companion to Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Jeannette Littlemore and John R. Taylor, 234–252. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Liedtke, Frank, and Cornelia Schulze (eds). 2013. Beyond Words, Content, Context, and Inference. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Littlemore, Jeanette. 2015. Metonymy: Hidden Shortcuts in Language, Thought and Communication. Cambridge: University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Markert, Katja, and Malvina Nissim. 2006. “Metonymic Proper Names: A Corpus-based Account.” In Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy, ed. by Anatol Stefanowitsch, and Stefan Th. Gries, 152–174. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Maiilat, Didier, and Steve Oswald. 2011. “Constraining Context: a Pragmatic Account of Cognitive Manipulation.” In Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition, ed. by Christopher Hart, 65–80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oswald, Steve. 2014. “It is easy to Miss Something You are Not Looking for: A Pragmatic Account of Covert Communicative Influence for (Critical) Discourse Analysis.” In Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies, ed. by Christopher Hart, and Piotr Cap, 97–120. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Pouscoulous, Nausica. 2013. “Early Pragmatics with Words.” In Beyond Words, Content, Context, and Inference, ed. by Frank Liedtke, and Cornelia, Schulze, 121–146. Berlin, Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radden, Günter, and Zoltán Kövecses. 1999. “Towards a Theory of Metonymy.” In Metonymy in Language and Thought, ed. by Klaus-Uwe Panther, and Günther Radden, 17–60, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reisigl, Martin. 2007. Nationale Rhetorik in Fest- und Gedenkreden [National Rhetoric in Jubilee and Commemorative Speeches]. Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag Brigitte Narr GmbH.Google Scholar
. 2008. Rhetoric of Political Speeches. In Handbooks of Applied Linguistics Vol. 4, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Veronika Keller, 243–269. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2014. “Argumentation Analysis and the Discourse-Historical Approach: A Methological Framework.” In Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies, ed. by Christopher Hart, and Piotr Cap, 67–96, London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Ristovski, B.: Ристовски, Б. 2006. “Статусот на македонскиот јазик денеска [Contemporary Status of the Macedonian language]” In Јазичната политика и статусот на македонскиот јазик: зборник на трудови од научен собир, одржан на 30–31 март 2005, ed. By Велковска, С. 7–24. Скопје: Институт за македонски јазик „Крсте Мисирков”.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco J., and Lorena Perez Hernandez. 2003. “Cognitive Operations and Pragmatic Implication.” In Metonymy and Pragmatic Inferencing, ed. by Klaus-Uwe Panther, and Linda L. Thornburg, 23–49. Amsterdam Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco J. 2014. “On the Nature and Scope of Metonymy in Linguistic Description and Explanation.” In The Bloomsbury Companion to Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Jeannette Littlemore, and John R. Taylor, 143–166. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Salamurović, Aleksandra. 2012. „Die Sprache im gegenwärtigen politischen und medialen Diskurs in Serbien und Kroatien zwischen Euroskeptizismus und Populismus [Language use in Contemporary discourse of politics and media in Serbia and Croatia between Euroscepticism and Populism]” Südosteuropa. Zeitschrift für Politik und Gesellschaft, Sonderheft “Euroskeptizismus und Populismus in Südosteuropa”, ed. by Florian, Bieber, Daniela, Mehler and Ksenija, Petrović 2: 239–263, Regensburg: Institut für Ost- und Südosteuropaforschung.Google Scholar
Schäffner, Christina. 2003. “Framing the past. An analysis of John Major’s address.” In The Art of Commemoration. Fifty Years after the Warsaw Uprising, ed. by Titus Ensink, and Christoph Sauer, 116–140. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soldić, Marko. 2012. “Ilinden. Linking a Macedonian Past, Present and Future.” In Transforming National Holidays. Identity Discourse in the West and South Slavic countries, 1985–2010, ed. by Ljiljana Šarić, Karen Gammelsgaard, and Kjetil Ra Hange, 191–212. Amsterdam Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson. 1995. Relevance. Communication and Cognition. 2nd edition. Oxford and Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Rudolf de Cillia. 2007. “Commemorating the Past: the Discursive Construction of Official Narratives about the ‘Rebirth of the Second Austrian Republic’.” Discourse & Communication 1(3): 337–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Salamurović, Aleksandra
2023. The Metonymy EUrope as a Means of Legitimizing Nations in the Western Balkans. In Konzepte der NATION im europäischen Kontext im 21. Jahrhundert [Linguistik in Empirie und Theorie/Empirical and Theoretical Linguistics, ], ► pp. 219 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.