Chapter published in:
The Language of Crisis: Metaphors, frames and discourses
Edited by Mimi Huang and Lise-Lotte Holmgreen
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 87] 2020
► pp. 5186
References

References

Bauman, Zygmunt
2006Liquid Fear. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bernárdez, Enrique
2008 “Collective Cognition and Individual Activity: Variation, Language and Culture.” In Body, Language, and Mind. Volume 2. Sociocultural Situatedness, ed. by Roslyn M. Frank, René Dirven, Tom Ziemke, and Enrique Bernárdez, 137–166. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan
2004Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Politicians and Rhetoric. The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chilton, Paul
2004Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dabrowska, Ewa, and Dagmar Divjak
2015Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dirven, René, Frank Polzenhagen, and Hans-Georg Wolf
2007 “Cognitive Linguistics, Ideology, and Critical Discourse Analysis.” In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Dirk Geeraerts, and Hubert Cuyckens, 1222–1240. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
1992Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Frank, Roslyn M., René Dirven, Tom Ziemke, and Enrique Bernárdez
(eds.) 2008Body, Language, and Mind. Volume 2. Sociocultural Situatedness. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk
2010 “Recontextualizing Grammar: Underlying Trends in Thirty Years of Cognitive Linguistics.” In Cognitive Linguistics in Action: From Theory to Application and Back, ed. By Elżbieta Tabakowska, Micha Choinski, and Łukasz Wiraszka, 71–102. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk, and Hubert Cuyckens
(eds.) 2007The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hampe, Beate
(ed.) 2005From Perception to Meaning. Image schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harbulot, Christian, and Éric Delbecque
2012La Guerre Économique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Hart, Christopher
2010Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Discourse, Grammar and Ideology: Functional and Cognitive Perspectives. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
2015 “Discourse.” In Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Ewa Dabrowska, and Dagmar Divjak, 322–346. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holland, Dorothy, and Naomi Quinn
(eds.) 1987Cultural Models in Language and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Mark
1987The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koller, Veronika
2014 “Cognitive Linguistics and Ideology.” In The Bloomsbury Companion to Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Jeanette Littlemore, and John R. Taylor, 234–252. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán
2002Metaphor. A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2005Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Where Metaphors Come From. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, Paul
Lakoff, George
1987Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996Moral Politics. How Liberals and Conservatives Think. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2004Don’t Think of Elephant! Know your Values and Frame the Debate: The Essential Guide for Progressives. New York: Chelsea Green.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
1980Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1999Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Turner
1989More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Musolff, Andreas, and Jorg Zinken
(eds.) 2009Metaphor and Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pishwa, Hanna
(ed.) 2009Language and Social Cognition. Expression of the Social Mind. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rojo López, Ana María, and María Ángeles Orts Llopis
2010 “Metaphorical Pattern Analysis in Financial Texts: Framing the Crisis in Positive or Negative Metaphorical Terms.” Journal of Pragmatics 42: 3300–3313. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schank, Roger C., and Roger P. Abelson
1977Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding. Hillsdale/New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Semino, Elena
2008Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sharifian, Farzad
2009 “On Collective Cognition and Language.” In Language and Social Cognition: Expression of the Social Mind, ed. by Hanna Pishwa, 163–180. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2011Cultural Conceptualizations and Language: Theoretical Framework and Applications. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Soares da Silva, Augusto
2006O Mundo dos Sentidos em Português: Polissemia, Semântica e Cognição [The World of Senses in Portuguese: Polysemy, Semantics and Cognition]. Coimbra: Almedina.Google Scholar
2013 “O que sabemos sobre a crise económica, pela metáfora. Conceptualizações metafóricas da crise na imprensa portuguesa.” [What we know about the economic crisis through metaphor. Metaphorical conceptualizations of the crisis in the Portuguese press] Revista Media & Jornalismo 23 (1): 11–34.Google Scholar
2015 “Discurso na mente e na comunidade. Para a sinergia entre Linguística Cognitiva e Análise (Crítica) do Discurso.” [Discourse in the mind and in the community. Toward a synergy between Cognitive Linguistics and (Critical) Discourse Analysis] Revista Portuguesa de Humanidades – Estudos Linguísticos 19 (1): 53–78.Google Scholar
2016 “The Persuasive (and Manipulative) Power of Metaphor in ‘Austerity’ Discourse: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Embodied and Moral Metaphors of Austerity in the Portuguese Press.” In Exploring Discourse Strategies in Socio-Cognitive Interaction: A Multimodal and Cross-Linguistic Approach, ed. by Manuela Romano, and M. Dolores Porto, 79–108. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Soares da Silva, Augusto, Maria Josep Cuenca, and Manuela Romano
2017 “The Conceptualisation of AUSTERITY in the Portuguese, Spanish and Irish Press.” In Advances in Cultural Linguistics, ed. by Farzad Sharifian, 345–368. Singapore: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steen, Gerard J.
2011 “The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor – Now New and Improved!Review of Cognitive Linguistics 9 (1): 26–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol
2006 “Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy.” In Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy, ed. by Anatol Stefanowitsch, and Stephan Th. Gries, 1–16. Berlin/NewYork: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol, and Stefan Th. Gries
2006Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1988 “Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition.” Cognitive Science 12: 49–100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Vol. I: Concept Structuring Systems. Vol. II: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun
(ed.) 1997Discourse Studies. A Multidisciplinary Introduction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer
(eds.) 2003Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Zlatev, Jordan, Timothy P. Racine, Chris Sinha, and Esa Itkonen
(eds.) 2008The Shared Mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar