List of Tables
Table 2.1
Le Figaro’s (LF) and
Le Monde’s (LM) circulation, website visits and reach
19
Table 2.2
Le Monde’s “concentric network of socio-cultural identities”
24
Table 2.3
Le Monde’s uses of its individual (I) and collective (C) socio-cultural identities to construct
“European-ness”
24
Table 2.4
Corpora construction
28
Table 2.5
Toulmin’s model of argumentation (1958)
33
Table 2.6
Corpora and types of analysis for each case study
34
Table 3.1
“
Europe” and “
européen/ne/s” in
Le Monde’s headlines
49
Table 3.2
Role of “
Union européenne” and “
Commission européenne” in
Le Monde’s
headlines
50
Table 3.3
Number of mentions of European State names in print and online headlines
51
Table 3.4
Le Monde’s use of its collective identity values in internal French matters, European matters, or world
matters for the representation of various States
57
Table 4.1
Preliminary selection of articles for the European institutional framework
69
Table 4.2
Actors in the Brexit all-genre corpus
72
Table 5.1
States mentioned in the primary corpus
87
Table 5.2
States mentioned in the text of the articles of the primary corpus
89
Table 5.3
Group of States mentioned in the text of the articles of the primary corpus
90
Table 5.4
Positive and negative stances in headlines of the primary corpus
91
Table 5.5
Headlines with a positive stance
93
Table 5.6
Number of mentions of « communisme » in the text
93
Table 5.7
Main results of the headline analysis
97
Table 5.8
Semantic clusters in the Poland sub-corpus
103
Table 5.9
Semantic clusters in the Hungary sub-corpus
104
Table 5.10
Semantic clusters in the Romania sub-corpus
104
Table 5.11
Semantic clusters and their significant references to Europe, Russia, or Communism
106
Table 6.1
Thematic clusters in the corpus Ukraine / Europe
119
Table 6.2
Lemmas related to EU values
120
Table 6.3
List of the most frequent lemmas in the corpus on Ukraine / Europe and its cluster 8
121
Table 7.1
Semantic clusters in the all-genre Belarus corpus
147
Table 7.2
Most common lemmas in the Belarus corpus
157
Table 7.3
Lemma in collocation with
Loukachenko
158
Table 8.1
Semantic clusters in the all-genre Turkey corpus
168
Table 8.2
Semantic clusters of the editorial Turkey corpus
169
Table 8.3
Classification of Turkey editorials according to their rhetorical analysis
186
Table 9.1
Available response strategies to institutional demands
203
Table 9.2
A model of responses to conflicting institutional demands
203
Table 9.3
Number of mentions of “Pologne” in
Le Monde’s headlines before and after the Eurosceptic PiS’ access to
power
211
Table 9.4
Number of mentions of “Hongrie” and “Orban” in
Le Monde’s headlines before and after the Eurosceptic Fidesz’s
access to power
212