Cover not available
Part of
Discourse Studies in Public Communication
Edited by Eliecer Crespo-Fernández
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 92] 2021
► pp. 39–58

Chapter 2
Political and journalistic discourse regarding the Catalan declaration of independence

A critical analysis

ORCID logo | Instituto de Lingüística Aplicada, Universidad de Cádiz, Spain
As van Dijk argues, ideologies are social beliefs which are usually transmitted through discourse, and therefore journalistic and political texts are seen to be two trusted means of communication which are ideal for that function. Within the framework of the relation between language and ideology, my aim is to carry out a critical discourse analysis of various texts of this type. I shall begin by comparing the content of seven different newspapers published on 28 October 2017, the day after the Catalan Parliament’s unilateral declaration of independence (UDI). Four of these are national in scope (ABC, El País, El Mundo, and La Razón) and three are published in Catalonia (La Vanguardia, El Periódico de Catalunya, and Ara). I then focus my attention on the information expressed in two of these, namely ABC and La Vanguardia, with the aim of examining the different ways the same information is treated and the linguistic mechanisms used to downplay or enhance the same facts for different ideological purposes. In a similar vein, I go on to analyse the different discourse approaches adopted by the main political parties when dealing with the concept of the State in their respective manifestos for the 2019 general election.
Keywords: political discourse, journalistic discourse, ideology, nationalism, propaganda, Spain, Catalonia
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Journalistic language, political language, and ideology
  • 3.The treatment of the unilateral declaration of independence in the Spanish and Catalan press
  • 4.The concept of Spain in the political discourse of the 2019 general election
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 7 April 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.92.02esc
References (20)
References
Bowell, Tracy, and Kemp, Gary. 2002. Critical Thinking. A Concise Guide. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casas Gómez, Miguel. 2009. “Towards a New Approach to the Linguistic Definition of Euphemism.” Language Sciences 31: 725–739. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crespo-Fernández, Eliecer. 2013. “Words as Weapons for Mass Persuasion: Dysphemism in Churchill’s Wartime Speeches.” Text & Talk 33 (3): 310–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. “Euphemism as a Discursive Strategy in US Local and State Politics.” Journal of Language and Politics 17 (6): 789–811. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Fernández Lagunilla, Marina. 1999. La lengua en la comunicación política II: La palabra del poder [Language in political communication: The word of power]. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Fernández Smith, Gérard. 2017a. “Aspectos pragmáticos y discursivos de los usos eufemísticos en la comunicación pública [Pragmatic and discursive aspects of euphemistic uses in public communication].” RILCE 33 (3): 1142–1170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017b. “Instrumentos lingüísticos de los discursos de odio en la prensa digital [Linguistic tools of the discourse of hate in online press].” Fragmentum 50: 99–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernández Smith, Gérard, and Casas Gómez, Miguel. 2018. “From Lexicon to Discourse in the Linguistic Expression of Taboo: Configuring New Social Realities.” In Taboo in Discourse. Studies on Attenuation and Offence in Communication, ed. by Eliecer Crespo-Fernández, 25–52. Bern: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forgas Berdet, Esther. 2013. “Ideología y lenguaje periodístico. Los titulares en la prensa hispana [Ideology and journalistic language. Headings in Hispanic press].” In Actas del XXVI Congreso Internacional de Lingüística y de Filología Románicas, ed. by Emili Casanova Herrero, and Cesáreo Calvo Rigual, 487–498. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina. 1999. La organización informativa del texto [The informative structure of texts]. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
García Rodríguez, Rocío I. 2005. “Mecanismos de cohesión léxica: análisis comparativo de algunas propuestas clasificatorias [Mechanisms of lexical cohesion: A comparative analysis of some proposals for classification].” Interlingüística 16 (1): 503–515.Google Scholar
Martín Rojo, María Luisa. 2003. “El análisis crítico del discurso. Fronteras y exclusión social en los discursos racistas [Critical Discourse Analysis. Borders and social exclusion].” In Análisis del discurso. Manual para las ciencias sociales [Discourse Analysis. Handbook of social sciences], ed. by Lupicinio Íñiguez Rueda, 157–191. Barcelona: UOC.Google Scholar
Martínez Albertos, José Luis. 1989. El lenguaje periodístico [Journalistic language]. Madrid: Paraninfo.Google Scholar
Musolff, Andreas. 2010. Metaphor, Nation and the Holocaust. The Concept of the Body Politic. New York and London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sánchez García, Francisco José. 2018. Eufemismos del discurso político. Las claves lingüísticas del arte del disimulo [Euphemisms in political discourse. Linguistic keys for the art of concealment]. Madrid: Visor.Google Scholar
Tittle, Peg. 2011. Critical Thinking. An Appeal to Reason. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. 1999. “El análisis crítico del discurso [Critical Discourse Analysis].” Anthropos 186: 23–36.Google Scholar
2003. Ideología y discurso. Una introducción multidisciplinaria [Ideology and discourse. A multidisciplinary introduction]. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer. 2015. “Critical Discourse Studies: History, Agenda, Theory and Methodology.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 1–22. London: SAGE.Google Scholar