References (47)
References
Allan, Keith, and Kate Burridge. 2006. Forbidden Words. Taboo and the Censoring of Language. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anthony, Lawrence. 2019. AntConc (Version 3.5.8) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University. [URL]
Bell, Allan. 1998. “The Discourse Structure of News Stories.” In Discourse Studies, ed. by Teun A. van Dijk, 58–89. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Ulla Connor, and Thomas A. Upton. 2007. Discourse on the Move. Using Corpus Analysis to Describe Discourse Structure. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, Paul. 2017. The Online Journalism Handbook. Skills to Survive and Thrive in the Digital Age. Oxon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Deborah. 1995. Verbal Hygiene. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Casado Velarde, Manuel. 2008. “Algunas estrategias discursivas en el lenguaje periodístico de hoy [Some discursive strategies in journalistic discourse today].” Boletín Hispánico Helvético 12: 71–89.Google Scholar
. 2011. “El poder de las palabras: lenguaje y manipulación [The power of words: language and manipulation].” Nueva Revista de Política, Cultura y Arte 134: 162–174.Google Scholar
Casas Gómez, Miguel. 2012. “El realce expresivo como función eufemística: a propósito de la corrección política de ciertos usos lingüísticos [Expressive reinforcement: regarding political correctness of certain linguistic uses].” In Political Correctness. Aspectos politicos, sociales, literarios y mediaticos de la censura política [Political correctness. Social, literary, and mediatic aspects of political censorship], ed. by Ursula Reutner, and Elmar Schafroth, 61–79. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2018. “Lexicon, Discourse and Cognition: Terminological Delimitations in the Conceptualizations of Linguistic Taboo.” In Linguistic Taboo Revisited. Novel Insights from Cognitive Perspectives, ed. by Andrea Pizarro Pedraza, 13–31. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coseriu, Eugenio. 1955–56. “Determinación y entorno. Dos problemas de una lingüística del hablar [Determination and surroundings. Two problems for a linguistics of speech].” Romanistisches Jährbuch 7: 29–54.Google Scholar
Crespo-Fernández, Eliecer. 2013. “Words as Weapons for Mass Persuasion: Dysphemism in Churchill’s Wartime Speeches.” Text & Talk 33 (3): 310–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. “Eufemismo y política: un estudio comparativo del discurso político local británico y español [Euphemism and politics: A comparative study of British and Spanish political discourse].” Pragmalingüística 24: 8–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. “Euphemism as a Discursive Strategy in US Local and State Politics.” Journal of Language and Politics 17 (6): 789–811. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deutscher, Guy. 2011. Through the Language Glass. Why the World Looks Different in Other Languages. London: Arrow.Google Scholar
Díaz Noci, Javier, and Ramón Salaverría Aliaga (eds). 2003. Manual de redacción ciberperiodística [The handbook of ciber-journalistic writing]. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Media Discourse. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
. 2003. “‘Political Correctness’: The Politics of Culture and Language.” Discourse & Society 14 (1): 17–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. “Semiosis, Ideology and Mediation: A Dialectical View.” In Mediating Ideology in Text and Image. Ten Critical Studies, ed. by Inger Lassen, Jeanne Strunck, and Torben Vestergaard, 19–35. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernández Lagunilla, Marina. 2002. “La ‘mala lengua’ de los políticos [Foulmouthed politicians].” In Anàlisi del discurs polític: producción, mediació i recepció [Political discourse analysis: Production, mediation, and reception], ed. by Clara U. Lorda, and Montserrat Ribas, 63–80. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Google Scholar
Fernández Smith, Gérard. 2015. “Los límites de la política y planificación lingüísticas [The boundaries of language policy and planning].” Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 10: 34–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. “Instrumentos lingüísticos de los discursos del odio en la prensa digital [Linguistic instruments of hatred discourses in digital press].” In Os discursos de intimidação: de onde eles vêm e para onde vão? [Intimidating speeches: Where do they come from and where do they go?], ed. by Juan Manuel López Muñoz, and Paola Capponi. Fragmentum 50: 99–122.Google Scholar
. 2019. “Adecuación textual y géneros discursivos en la comunicación periodística, o por qué no se debe siempre matar al mensajero [Textual appropriateness and discourse genres, or why the messenger should not always be shot].” In Lengua, cultura, discurso [Language, Culture, Discourse], ed. by Ramón González Ruiz, Inés Olza, and Óscar Loureda Lamas, 241–254. Pamplona: EUNSA.Google Scholar
Fernández Smith, Gérard, and Miguel Casas Gómez. 2018. “From lexicon to discourse in the linguistic expression of taboo: Configuring new social realities.” In Taboo in Discourse: Studies on Attenuation and Offence in Communication, ed. by Eliecer Crespo-Fernández, 25–52. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flores Treviño, Maria Eugenia. 2016. “Violencia, género y sexismo: una muestra de estrategias argumentativas en el discurso político mexicano [Violence, gender, and sexism: A sample of argumentative strategies in Mexican political discourse].” In Estrategias argumentativas y discurso político [Argumentative strategies and political dicourse], ed. by Catalina Fuentes Rodríguez, 75–105. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina. 2016. “El discurso político: argumentación, imagen y poder [Political discourse: Argumentation, image, and power].” In Estrategias argumentativas y discurso político [Argumentative strategies and political discourse], ed. by Catalina Fuentes Rodríguez, 17–48. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Guerrero Salazar, Susana. 2007. La creatividad en el lenguaje periodístico [Creativity in journalistic discourse]. Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar
. 2019. Las demandas a la RAE sobre el sexismo del diccionario: La repercusión del discurso mediático [The requirements to the Spanish Academy of Language on sexism in the dictionary: The influence of media discourse]. Doxa Comunicación 29: 43–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez Vidrio, Silvia. 2010. “Discurso periodístico: una propuesta analítica [Jounalistic discourse: an analyitical approach].” Comunicación y Sociedad 14: 169–198.Google Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michał. 2016. “Recontextualisation of Neoliberalism and the Increasingly Conceptual Nature of Discourse: Challenges for Critical Discourse Studies.” Discourse & Society 27 (3): 308–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laborda Gil, Xavier. 2011. Lágrimas de cocodrilo. Análisis del discurso político [Crocodile tears. Political discourse analysis]. Barcelona: UOC.Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin. 2018. “The Discourse-Historical Approach.” In The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, ed. by John Flowerdew, and John E. Richardson, 44–59. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sánchez García, Francisco José. 2018. Eufemismos del discurso político. Las claves lingüísticas del arte del disimulo [Euphemisms in political discourse. Linguistic keys for the art of concealment]. Madrid: Visor.Google Scholar
Strate, Lance. 2017. Media Ecology: An Approach to Understanding the Human Condition. Bern: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. 1980. Macrostructures. An Interdisciplinary Study of Global Structures in Discourse, Interaction, and Cognition. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
1991. Racism and the Press. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
1999. “El Análisis Crítico del Discurso [Critical Discourse Analysis].” Anthropos 186: 23–36.Google Scholar
2001. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen, and Heidi E. Hamilton, 352–371. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun. A. 2003. Ideología y discurso. Una introducción multidisciplinaria [Ideology and discourse. A multidisciplinary introduction]. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. 2010. “Discurso, conocimiento, poder y políticas. Hacia un análisis crítico epistémico del discurso [Discourse, knowledge, power, and policies. Towards a critical epistemic analysis of discourse].” Revista de Investigación Lingüística 13: 167–215.Google Scholar
2014. Discourse and Knowledge: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2000. “Recontextualisation and Transformation of Meanings.” In Discourse and Social Life, ed. by Srikant Sarangi, and Malcolm Coulthard, 185–207. London: Longman.Google Scholar
. 2001. “The Discourse-historical Approach.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 63–94. London: Sage.Google Scholar
. 2011. “The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual.” Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Bernhard Forchtner (eds). 2018. The Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics. Oxon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer (eds). 2001. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar