Part of
Participation, Engagement and Collaboration in Newsmaking: A postfoundational perspective
Edited by Jana Declercq, Geert Jacobs, Felicitas Macgilchrist and Astrid Vandendaele
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 94] 2021
► pp. 4366
Arnoldi, Jakob
2007 “Universities and the Public Recognition of Expertise.” Minerva 45 (1): 49-61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cotter, Colleen, and Daniel Perrin
(eds) 2017The Routledge Handbook of Language and Media. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Della Giusta, Marina
2018 “Economists, unlike Scientists, Do a Poor Job of Communicating via Twitter.” LSE Business Review. Accessed January 6, 2020. [URL].Google Scholar
Della Giusta, Marina, Danica Vukadinovic-Greetham, and Sylvia Jaworska
2018 “Tweeting Economists: Antisocial in the Socials?” University of Reading. Working Paper.Google Scholar
2015 “The Spiral of Silence – How Anti-TTIP Groups Dominate German Online Media and Set the Tone for TTIP Opinion.” Accessed January 6, 2020. [URL].Google Scholar
2018a “How to Make Trade Policy Cool Again on Social Media.” Accessed January 6, 2020. [URL].Google Scholar
2018b “Trade is Here to Stay.” Accessed January 6, 2020. [URL].Google Scholar
2018c “Why Trade-NOW.” Accessed January 6, 2020. [URL].Google Scholar
2018d “How to Prepare for the next Anti-Free Trade Campaign.” Accessed January 6, 2020. [URL].Google Scholar
2018e “‘This is Not a Love Song’.” Accessed January 6, 2020. [URL].Google Scholar
2018f “Fake News and How to Use Twitter in a Meaningful Way for Policy Debates: Lessons from the European Commission’s “Digital Tax” Campaign.” Accessed January 6, 2020. [URL].Google Scholar
2019 “About Us.” Accessed January 6, 2020. [URL].Google Scholar
Franklin, Bob
2014 “The Future of Journalism.” Journalism Studies 15 (5): 481-499. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gheyle, Niels
2019Trade Policy with the Lights on: the Origins, Dynamics, and Consequences of the Politicization of TTIP. PhD diss., Ghent University.Google Scholar
Gheyle, Niels, and Ferdi De Ville
2017 “How Much is Enough? Explaining the Continuous Transparency Conflict in TTIP.” Politics and Governance 5 (3): 16-28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glynos, Jason, and David J. Howarth
2007Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gstöhl, Sieglinde, and Dirk De Bièvre
2017The Trade Policy of the European Union. Basingstoke: Macmillan International Higher Education.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Geert
2018a “Organizations and Corporate Communication.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Media, ed. by Colleen Cotter and Daniel Perrin. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Thomas
2018b “Poststructuralist Discourse Theory as an Independent Paradigm for Studying Institutions: Towards a New Definition of ‘Discursive Construction’ in Institutional Analysis.” Contemporary Political Theory 18 (3): 379-401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019a “The Strategic Turn in Post-Marxist Discourse Theory.” Global Discourse 9 (2). [URL].Google Scholar
2019b “The Dislocated Universe of Laclau and Mouffe: An Introduction to Post-Structuralist Discourse Theory.” Critical Review 30 (3–4): 294-315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, Marianne, and Louise Phillips
2002Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe
2001Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso Trade.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto
1990New Reflections on the Revolution of our Time. London: Verso.Google Scholar
2005On Populist Reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Macgilchrist, Felicitas
2016 “Fissures in the Discourse-scape: Critique, Rationality and Validity in Post-Foundational Approaches to CDS.” Discourse & Society 27 (3): 262–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Macgilchrist, Felicitas, and Inse Böhmig
2012 “Blogs, Genes and Immigration: Online Media and Minimal Politics.” Media, Culture & Society 34 (1): 83-100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Macgilchrist, Felicitas
2007 “Positive Discourse Analysis: Contesting Dominant Discourses by Reframing the Issues.” Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines 1 (1): 74-94.Google Scholar
Nonhoff, Martin
2019 “Hegemony Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Research Practice.” In Discourse, Culture and Organization, ed. by Tomas Marttila, 63-104. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peterson, M. A.
2015 “Speaking of news: Press, democracy, and metapragmatics in a changing India.” American Ethnologist 42 (4): 673–687. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Phelan, Sean, and Lincoln Dahlberg
(eds) 2011Discourse Theory and Critical Media Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo
2007 “Legitimation in Discourse and Communication.” Discourse & Communication 1 (1): 91-112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verschueren, J.
1985 “International news reporting. Metapragmatic metaphors and the U-2”. In Pragmatics & beyond, ed. by Herman Parret & Jeff Verschueren (5th ed., Vol. 6, Issue VI:5). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verschueren, Jef
1999Understanding Pragmatics. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
2004 “Notes on the Role of Metapragmatic Awareness in Language Use. Jef Verschueren.” In Metalanguage: Social and Ideological Perspectives, ed. by Adam Jaworski, Nikolas Coupland, and Dariusz Galasinski, 53-74. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verschueren, Jef, and Jan-Ola Östman
(eds) 2009Key Notions for Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zienkowski, Jan
2017Articulations of Self and Politics in Activist Discourse. Berlin: Springer International Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zienkowski, Jan, Jan-Ola Östman, and Jan Verschueren
(eds) 2011Discursive Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar