Chapter published in:
Conspiracy Theory DiscoursesEdited by Massimiliano Demata, Virginia Zorzi and Angela Zottola
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 98] 2022
► pp. 215–238
Chapter 10COVID-19 conspiracy theories as affective discourse
Carmen Lee | Chinese University of Hong Kong
This chapter analyzes online reactive comments to news reports on COVID-19 conspiracy theories, with a focus on hate speech on the origin(s) of the coronavirus. Largely mediated by feelings and ‘polarized emotionality’ (Boler and Davis 2018), COVID-origin conspiracy theories mobilize distinct affective publics online: commenters include supporters of China-origin theories and US-origin theories, and non-believers of conspiracy theories respectively. Informed by the theoretical framework of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), this study explores (i) the emotion-triggering discursive strategies surrounding COVID-origin conspiracy theories and (ii) the linguistic devices that realize these strategies. The analysis is based on 849 reactive comments to five Hong Kong-based COVID-origin news reports posted on Facebook. The study has found that such reactive comments to COVID-origin conspiracy theories share similar discourse strategies with those identified in the literature of discriminatory discourse and (covert) hate speech. Both believers and non-believers of conspiracy theories tap into the topoi of danger and threats, and strategically employ referentials, scare tactics, quasi-fallacious argumentations, and intensification/mitigation to legitimize their ideological stances. These strategies stir up negative emotions channeled through COVID-origin conspiracy theories. This chapter reveals the intricate relationship of conspiracy theories, affect, and hate speech in mediatized society.
Keywords: conspiracy theories, COVID-19, hate speech, emotion, affect, discursive strategies, Critical Discourse Analysis
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Conspiracy theories and COVID-19 origins
- 3.Conspiracy theories as mediatized affective discourse
- 3.1Emotion, affect, and online hate speech
- 3.2COVID-origin conspiracy theories as discursive action of affect
- 3.2.1Discursive strategies of negative emotions
- 4.Data and categories of analysis
- 5.Discursive construction of COVID-origin conspiracy theories
- 5.1Nomination/referential strategies
- 5.2Scare tactics and hypothetical future
- 5.3Quasi-rational fallacious argumentation
- 5.4Intensifying and mitigation strategies
- 6.Conclusion
-
Notes -
References
References
Ahmed, Sara
2004 The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Assimakopoulos, Stavros, Fabienne H. Baider, and Sharon Millar
(eds.) 2017 Online Hate Speech in the European Union: A Discourse-Analytic Perspective. Cham: Springer Nature. 
Badjatiya, Pinkesh, Shashank Gupta, Manish Gupta, and Vasudeva Varma
2017 “Deep Learning for Hate Speech Detection in Tweets.” In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion, ed. by Rick Barrett, 759–760. Geneva: International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee.
Baider, Fabienne
2020 “Pragmatics Lost?: Overview, Synthesis and Proposition in Defining Online Hate Speech.” Pragmatics and Society 11 (2): 196–218.
Baider, Fabienne, and Maria Constantinou
2020 “Covert Hate Speech: A Contrastive Study of Greek and Greek Cypriot Online Discussions with an Emphasis on Irony.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 8 (2): 262–287.
Barton, David, and Carmen Lee
2013 Language Online: Investigating Digital Texts and Practices. Abingdon: Routledge.
Bergmann, Eirikur
2018 Conspiracy & Populism: The Politics of Misinformation. Cham: Springer.
2020 “Populism and the Politics of Misinformation.” Safundi 21 (3): 251–265.
Boler, Megan, and Elizabeth Davis
2018 “The Affective Politics of the “Post-Truth” Era: Feeling Rules and Networked Subjectivity.” Emotion, Space and Society 27: 75–85.
Bolsen, Toby, Risa Palm, and Justin T. Kingsland
2020 “Framing the Origins of COVID-19.” Science Communication 42 (5): 562–585.
Bouko, Catherine, and David Garcia
2019 “Citizens’ Reactions to Brexit on Twitter. A Content and Discourse Analysis.” In Discourses of Brexit, ed. by Veronika Koller, Susanne Kopf, and Marlene Miglbauer, 171–190. Abingdon: Routledge.
boyd, danah
2010 “Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications.” In A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites, ed. by Zizi Papacharissi, 39–58. NY: Routledge.
Brotherton, Robert, and Christopher C. French
2014 “Belief in Conspiracy Theories and Susceptibility to the Conjunction Fallacy.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 28 (2): 238–248.
Bruns, Axel, Stephen Harrington, and Edward Hurcombe
2020 “Corona? 5G? or Both?’: The Dynamics of COVID-19/5G Conspiracy Theories on Facebook.” Media International Australia 177 (1): 12–29.
Calvert, Clay
1997 “Hate Speech and Its Harms: A Communication Theory Perspective.” Journal of Communication 47 (1): 4–19.
Chen, Meilin, and John Flowerdew
2019 “Discriminatory Discursive Strategies in Online Comments on YouTube Videos on the Hong Kong Umbrella Movement by Mainland and Hong Kong Chinese.” Discourse & Society 30 (6): 549–572.
Chiluwa, Innocent, and Presley Ifukor
2015 “ ‘War Against Our Children’: Stance and Evaluation in# BringBackOurGirls Campaign Discourse on Twitter and Facebook.” Discourse & Society 26 (3): 267–296.
Chow, Gregory
2006 “Are Chinese Official Statistics Reliable?.” CESifo Economic Studies 52 (2): 396–414.
Depoux, Anneliese, Sam Martin, Emilie Karafillakis, Raman Preet, Annelies Wilder-Smith, and Heidi Larson
2020 “The Pandemic of Social Media Panic Travels Faster Than the COVID-19 Outbreak.” Journal of Travel Medicine 27 (3): 1–4.
Douglas, Karen, Aleksandra Cichocka, and Robbie M. Sutton
2020 “Motivations, Emotions and Belief in Conspiracy Theories.” In Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theories, ed. by Michael Butter, and Peter Knight, 181–191. London: Routledge.
Dresner, Eli, and Susan C. Herring
2010 “Functions of the Nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and Illocutionary Force.” Communication Theory 20 (3): 249–268.
Fischer, Agneta, Eran Halperin, Daphna Canetti, and Alba Jasini
2018 “Why We Hate.” Emotion Review 10 (4): 309–320.
Flowerdew, John, and Solomon Leong
2010 “Presumed Knowledge in the Discursive Construction of Socio-Political and Cultural Identity.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (8): 2240–2252.
Garde-Hansen, Joanne and Kristyn Gorton
2013 Emotion Online: Theorizing Affect on the Internet. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gitari, Njagi Dennis, Zhang Zuping, Hanyurwimfura Damien, and Jun Long
2015 “A Lexicon-Based Approach for Hate Speech Detection.” International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering 10 (4): 215–230.
Hart, Christopher
2010 Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Huffaker, David
2010 “Dimensions of Leadership and Social Influence in Online Communities.” Human Communication Research 36 (4): 593–617.
Jaworsky, Bernadette Nadya, and Runya Qiaoan
2020 “The Politics of Blaming: The Narrative Battle between China and the US over COVID-19.” Journal of Chinese Political Science 26 (2): 295–315.
Jones, Rodney
(ed.) 2021 Viral Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
KhosraviNik, Majid
2010 “Actor Descriptions, Action Attributions, and Argumentation: Towards a Systematization of CDA Analytical Categories in the Representation of Social Groups.” Critical Discourse Studies 7 (1): 55–72.
KhosraviNik, Majid, and Johann W. Unger
2016 “Critical Discourse Studies and Social Media: Power, Resistance and Critique in Changing Media Ecologies.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Studies (3rd edition), ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 205–233. London: Sage.
Ksiazek, Thomas B., and Nina Springer
2020 User Comments and Moderation in Digital Journalism: Disruptive Engagement. Abington: Routledge.
Lantian, Anthony, Dominique Muller, Cécile Nurra, Olivier Klein, Sophie Berjot, and Myrto Pantazi
2018 “Stigmatized Beliefs: Conspiracy Theories, Anticipated Negative Evaluation of the Self, and Fear of Social Exclusion.” European Journal of Social Psychology 48 (7): 939–954.
Lee, Carmen
2020 “Doxxing as Discursive Action in a Social Movement.” Critical Discourse Studies.
2021 “#HateIsAVirus: Talking about COVID-19 ‘Hate’.” In Viral Discourse, ed. by Rodney Jones, 61–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, Carmen, and Dennis Chau
2018 “Language as Pride, Love, and Hate: Archiving Emotions Through Multilingual Instagram Hashtags.” Discourse, Context & Media 22: 21–29.
Lee, Francis L. F., and Joseph M. Chan
2018 Media and Protest Logics in the Digital Era: The Umbrella Movement in Hong Kong. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leggitt, John S., and Raymond W. Gibbs
2000 “Emotional Reactions to Verbal Irony.” Discourse Processes 29 (1): 1–24.
Martin, James R., and Peter R. White
2005 The Language of Evaluation. Vol. 2. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
moonshot
. “From #Coronaviruscoverup to #NukeChina.” April 29 2020 http://moonshotcve.com/covid-19-conspiracy-theories-hate-speech-twitter/
Papacharissi, Zizi
2015 Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
2005 Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.
2016 “The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA).” In Methods of Critical Discourse Studies (3rd edition), ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 23–61. London: Sage.
Reyes, Antonio
2011 “Strategies of Legitimization in Political Discourse: From Words to Actions.” Discourse & Society 22 (6): 781–807.
Sahlane, Ahmed
2012 “Argumentation and Fallacy in the Justification of the 2003 War on Iraq.” Argumentation 26 (4): 459–488.
Schild, Leonard, Chen Ling, Jeremy Blackburn, Gianluca Stringhini, Yang Zhang, and Savvas Zannettou
2020 ““Go Eat a Bat, Chang!”: An Early Look on the Emergence of Sinophobic Behavior on Web Communities in the Face of Covid-19.” Preprint. http://arxiv.org/abs/2004.04046
Sierra, Sylvia
(2021) A Mexican Autodefensa Facebook Group’s use of binarity, legitimization strategies, and topoi of religion, family and struggle. Discourse, Context & Media, 42, 100497.
Stieglitz, Stefan, and Linh Dang-Xuan
2013 “Emotions and Information Diffusion in Social Media – Sentiment of Microblogs and Sharing Behavior.” Journal of Management Information Systems 29 (4): 217–248.
Van Dijk, Teun A.
1993 Elite Discourse and Racism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Van Leeuwen, Theo
2009 “Discourse as the Recontextualization of Social Practice: A Guide.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Studies (2nd edition), ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 144–161. London: Sage.
Van Leeuwen, Theo, and Ruth Wodak
1999 “Legitimizing Immigration Control: A Discourse-Historical Analysis.” Discourse Studies 1 (1): 83–118.
Wellman, Barry
2002 “Little Boxes, Glocalization, and Networked Individualism.” In Digital Cities II: Computational and Sociological Approaches, ed. by Makoto Tanabe, Peter Van den Besselaar, and Toru Ishida, 10–25. Heidelberg: Springer.
Wesch, Michael
2009 “YouTube and You: Experiences of Self-Awareness in the Context Collapse of the Recording Webcam.” Explorations in Media Ecology 8 (2): 19–34.
Wodak, Ruth
(2008) Us’ and ‘them’: Inclusion and exclusion-Discrimination via discourse. Identity, belonging and migration, 54–77.
2014 “Critical Discourse Analysis,” In Routledge Companion to English Studies ed. by Constant Leung, Brian V. Street, 332–346. Abingdon: Routledge.
Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer
2009 “Critical Discourse Analysis: History, Agenda, Theory and Methodology.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Studies (2nd edition), ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 1–33. London: Sage.
Ziegele, Marc, Mathias Weber, Oliver Quiring, and Timo Breiner
2018 “The Dynamics of Online News Discussions: Effects of News Articles and Reader Comments on Users’ Involvement, Willingness to Participate, and the Civility of Their Contributions.” Information, Communication & Society 21 (10): 1419–1435.