Part of
Conspiracy Theory DiscoursesEdited by Massimiliano Demata, Virginia Zorzi and Angela Zottola
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 98] 2022
► pp. 241–266
Edited by Massimiliano Demata, Virginia Zorzi and Angela Zottola
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 98] 2022
► pp. 241–266
Chapter 11The ID2020 conspiracy theory in YouTube video comments during COVID-19
Bonding around religious, political, and technological discourses
This chapter explores a dataset of YouTube video comments about the ‘ID2020’ conspiracy theory, which claims that Bill Gates is part of a global conspiracy to mandate a COVID-19 vaccine incorporating a tracking microchip. This conspiracy theory merges religious discourses about the ‘Mark of the Beast’, with discourses about quantum dot and blockchain technologies. The chapter aims to understand the kinds of values that are negotiated by users who interact with ID2020 conspiracy videos by posting in YouTube comment sections. The appraisal and communing affiliation frameworks developed within Systemic Functional Linguistics are used to investigate evaluative language and social bonding in the dataset. The results reveal distinct textual personae bonding around positions such as anti-globalism, anti-technology, political scepticism, and anti-vaccination.
Keywords: COVID-19, conspiracy theories, YouTube, systemic functional linguistics, bonding, affiliation, technology, religion, politics, discourse
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.YouTube and conspiracy theories
- 3.Dataset
- 3.1Sampling strategy for YouTube videos
- 3.2Sampling strategy for comments
- 4.Method: Affiliation analysis
- 4.1Coupling analysis
- 4.2Affiliation analysis
- 5.Results
- 5.1Religious Fanatics
- 5.2Anti-technologists
- 5.3Anti-Globalists
- 5.4Political sceptics
- 5.5Anti-Vaxxers and COVID-19 Denialists
- 5.6Educators
- 6.Bond cluster diagram of personae and their bonds
- 7.Conclusion
-
Notes -
References
References (23)
Allington, Daniel, and Tanvi Joshi. 2020. ““What Others Dare Not Say”: An Antisemitic Conspiracy Fantasy and its YouTube Audience.” Journal of Contemporary Antisemitism 3 (1). 
Cassam, Quassim. 2019. Conspiracy Theories. Cambridge: Polity.
Coady, David. 2012. What to Believe Now: Applying Epistemology to Contemporary Issues. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
Ekman, Mattias. 2014. “The Dark Side of Online Activism: Swedish Right-wing Extremist Video Activism on YouTube.” MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research 30 (56): 79–99.
Finlayson, Alan. 2020. “YouTube and Political Ideologies: Technology, Populism and Rhetorical Form.” Political Studies.
Inwood, Olivia, and Michele Zappavigna. 2021. “Ambient Affiliation, Misinformation and Moral Panic: Negotiating Social Bonds in a YouTube Internet Hoax.” Discourse & Communication 15 (3).
Jane, Emma A., and Chris Fleming. 2014. Modern Conspiracy: The Importance of Being Paranoid. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Knight, Naomi K. 2008. ““Still cool…and american too!”: an SFL analysis of deferred bonds in internet messaging humour.” In Systemic Functional Linguistics in Use. ed. by N. Nørgaard, 481–502. Odense: Odense Working Papers in Language and Communication.
2010. “Laughing our Bonds off: Conversational Humour in Relation to Affiliation.” PhD Thesis, University of Sydney.
2013. “Evaluating Experience in Funny Ways: How Friends Bond through Conversational Humour.” Text & Talk 33 (4–5): 553–574.
Levy, Helton. 2020. “Grammars of Contestation and Pluralism: Paulo Freire’s Action in Brazil’s Periphery and the Rise of Right-wing Discourse on YouTube.” International Communication Gazette 82 (5): 474–489.
Lewis, Rebecca. 2018. “Alternative Influence: Broadcasting the Reactionary Right on YouTube.” New Data & Society [ebook]. Retrieved from: [URL]
Martin, J. R. 2000. “Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English.” In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, ed. by Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson, 142–175. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Martin, J. R., and P. R. R. White. 2005. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mohammed, Shaheed N. 2019. “Conspiracy Theories and Flat-Earth Videos on YouTube.” The Journal of Social Media in Society 8 (2): 84–102.
Paolillo, John C. 2018. “The Flat Earth Phenomenon on YouTube.” First Monday 23 (12).
Pigden, Charles R. 2007. “Conspiracy Theories and the Conventional Wisdom.” Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology 4 (2): 219–232.
Stenglin, Maree. 2008. “Interpersonal meaning in 3D space: How a Bonding Icon Gets its ‘Charge’.” In Multimodal semiotics: Functional analysis in contexts of education, ed. by Len Unsworth, 50–66. London: Continuum.
Strauss, Anselm, and Juliet M. Corbin. 1997. Grounded Theory in Practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Yablokov, Ilya. 2015. “Conspiracy Theories as a Russian Public Diplomacy Tool: The Case of Russia Today (RT).” Politics 35 (3–4): 301–315. .
. Zappavigna, Michele. 2018. Searchable Talk and Social Media Metadiscourse. London: Bloomsbury.
Zappavigna, Michele, and J. R. Martin. 2018. “# Communing affiliation: Social Tagging as a Resource for Aligning Around Values in Social Media.” Discourse, Context & Media 22: 4–12.
Zuk, Piotr, and Paweł Zuk. 2020. “Right-wing Populism in Poland and Anti-vaccine Myths on YouTube: Political and Cultural Threats to Public Health.” Global Public Health 15 (6): 790–804.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Tafi, Vanessa, Bryn Alexander Coles, Simon Goodman, Scott Yates & Christopher Elsey
2024. Scepticism or conspiracy? A discourse analysis of anti-lockdown comments to online newspaper articles. Critical Discourse Studies 21:4 ► pp. 482 ff. 
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.