Cover not available
Part of
Conspiracy Theory Discourses
Edited by Massimiliano Demata, Virginia Zorzi and Angela Zottola
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 98] 2022
► pp. 465–488

Chapter 20
“Gender ideology” and the discursive infrastructure of a transnational conspiracy theory

ORCID logo | University of Turin
ORCID logo | Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
The formula “gender ideology” has recently gained political traction in several countries. This chapter investigates its conspiracist discursive infrastructure by probing two corpora of far-right media from Brazil and the US. Analysis indicates that “gender ideology” is framed within semantic realms of manipulation, puppeteering, falseness, and danger. It also suggests that anti-gender rhetoric acts as an all-encompassing narrative whereby a cohort of inchoate but ideologically interlinked conspiracy theories are lumped together in a seemingly coherent whole. Comparing datasets from two countries empirically illustrates how anti-gender rhetoric crosses transnational borders and adapts to local specifics along the way.
Keywords: gender, ideology, conspiracy theories, Brazil, USA, corpus-based critical discourse analysis, floating signifier
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Anti-gender conspiracy narratives
  • 3.Data and methodology
  • 4.Analysis
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 1 December 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.98.20zot
References (50)
References
Aciprensa. 2017. Colombia: miles piden sacar ideología de género del acuerdo de paz con las FARC. Available: [URL]. Accessed December 17, 2020.
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid KhosraviNik, Michal Krzyzanowski, Tony McEnery, and Ruth Wodak. 2008. “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse and Society 19 (3): 273–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Paul. 2005. Public Discourses of Gay Men. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barkun, Michael. 2016. “Conspiracy Theories as Stigmatized Knowledge.” Diogenes October 2016: 1–7.Google Scholar
Bernini, Lorenzo. 2020. Queer Theories: From Mario Mieli to the Antisocial Turn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Borba, Rodrigo. 2019. “Gendered Politics of Enmity: Language Ideologies and Social Polarisation in Brazil.” Gender and Language 13 (4): 423–448. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. “Disgusting Politics: Circuits of Affect and the Making of Bolsonaro.” Social Semiotics 31 (5): 677–694. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2022. “Enregistering ‘Gender Ideology’: The Emergence and Circulation of a Transnational Anti-gender Language.” Journal of Language and Sexuality 11 (1): 57–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Byford, Jovan. 2011. Conspiracy Theories. A Critical Introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Deborah. 2020. “Banter, Male Bonding, and the Language of Donald Trump.” In Language in the Trump Era: Scandals and Emergencies, ed. by Janet McIntosh and Norma Mendoza-Denton, 158–167. London: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campana, Maximiliano. 2020. Políticas antigénero en America Latina: Argentina. Rio de Janeiro: ABIA.Google Scholar
Case, Mary Anne. 2019. “Trans Formations in the Vatican’s War on ‘Gender Ideology’.” Signs 44 (3): 639–664. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corrêa, Sonia. 2018. “A política do gênero: um comentário genealógico”. Cadernos Pagu 53: e185301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corrêa, Sonia and Isabela Kalil. 2020. Políticas Antigénero en America Latina: Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: ABIA.Google Scholar
Corredor, Elizabeth. 2019. “Unpacking ‘Gender Ideology’ and the Global Right’s Antigender Countermovement.” Signs 44 (3): 613–638. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delgado, Jaime. 2020. Chile – ¿Estrategias en construcción? Rio de Janeiro: ABIA.Google Scholar
Douglas, Karen, Joseph Uscinski, Robbie Sutton, Aleksandra Cichocka, Turkay Nefes, Chee Siang Ang, and Farzin Deravi. 2019. “Understanding Conspiracy Theories.” Advances in Political Psychology 40 (1): 3–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman, and Ruth Wodak. 1997. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Discourse as Social Interaction, ed. by Teun van Dijk, 258–284. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan. 2018. “Registers in Circulation: The Social Organization of Interdiscursivity.” Signs and Society 6 (1): 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. “Making Registers in Politics: Circulation and Ideologies of Linguistic Authority.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 23 (5): 450–466. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. “Gender and the Discursive Authority of Far-right Politics.” Gender and Language. 15 (1): 96–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garbagnoli, Sara. 2016. “Against the Heresy of Immanence: Vatican’s ‘Gender’ as a New Rhetorical Device against the Denaturalization of the Sexual Order.” Religion & Gender 6 (2): 187–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graff, Agnieszka, and Elzbieta Korolczuk. 2017. “‘Worse than Communism and Nazism put Together’: War on Gender in Poland.” In Anti-gender Campaigns in Europe: Mobilizing against Equality, ed. by Roman Kuhar, and David Paternotte, 175–194. London: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Graff, Agnieszka, Ratna Kapur, and Suzanna Walters. 2019. “Gender and the Rise of the Global Right.” Signs 44 (3): 541–560. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hardie, Andrew. 2012. “CQPweb – Combining Power, Flexibility and Usability in a Corpus Analysis Tool.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 17 (3): 380–409. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huneman, Philippe, and Marion Vorms. 2018. “Is a Unified Account of Conspiracy Theories Possible?” Argumenta 3 (2): 247–270.Google Scholar
Junqueira, Rogério. 2019. “‘A invenção da “ideologia de gênero’: a emergência de um cenário político-discursivo e a elaboração de uma retórica reacionária antigênero.” Psicologia Política 18 (43): 449–502.Google Scholar
Katsiveli, Stamatina, and Elvis Coimbra-Gomes. 2020. “Discursive Construction of the Enemy through Metonymy. The Case of CitizenGo`s Anti-genderist E-petitions.” Anglistica AION 24 (1): 9–23.Google Scholar
Korolczuk, Elzbieta, and Agnieszka Graff. 2018. “Gender as ‘Ebola from Brussels’: The Anticolonial Frame and the Rise of Illiberal Populism.” Signs 43 (4): 797–821. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuhar, Roman, and David Paternotte. 2017. Anti-gender Campaigns in Europe: Mobilizing against Equality. London: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Mad’arová, Zuzana. 2015. “Love and fear: Argumentative Strategies against Gender Equality in Slovakia.” In Anti-gender Movements on the Rise? Strategising for Gender Equality in Central and Eastern Europe, ed. by Heinrich Böll Foundation, 33–42. Berlin: Heinrich Böll Foundation.Google Scholar
Marchlewska, Marta, Aleksandra Cichoka, Filip Lozowski, Paulina Górska, and Mikolaj Winiewski. 2019. “In Search of an Imaginary Enemy: Catholic Collective Narcissism and the Endorsement of Gender Conspiracy Beliefs.” Journal of Social Psychology 156 (6): 766–779. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McEnery, Tony, and Andrew Hardie. 2012. Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McIntyre, Lee. 2018. Post-Truth. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press Essential Knowledge Series. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mendoza-Denton, Norma. 2020. “‘Ask the gays’: How to use Language to Fragment the Public Sphere.” In Language in the Trump Era: Scandals and Emergencies, ed. by Janet McIntosh, and Norma Mendoza-Denton, 47–51. London: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meneses, Daniela. 2019. “Con mi hijos no te metas: un estudio de discurso y poder en un grupo de Facebook peruano opuesto a la “ideologia de género”.” Antropologica 42: 129–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miskolci, Richard, and Maximiliano Campana. 2017. “’Ideologia de gênero’: notas para a genealogia de um pânico moral contemporâneo.” Sociedade e Estado 32 (3): 725–747. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moragas, Mirta. 2020. Políticas Antigénero en America Latina: El Caso de la Organización de los Estados Americanos (OEA). Rio de Janeiro: ABIA.Google Scholar
Muelle, Camila. 2017. “Como hacer necropolíticas en casa: ideología de género y acuerdos de paz en Colombia.” Sexualidad, Salud y Sociedad 27: 172–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Leary, Dale. 1997. The Gender Agenda – Redefining equality. Lafayette: Vital Issues.Google Scholar
Procházka, Ondrej, and Jan Blommaert. 2021. “Ergoic Framing in New Right Online Groups: Q, the MAGA Kid, and the Deep State Theory.” Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 44 (1): 4–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramírez, Gabriela. 2020. “Ideología de género”: la herramienta retórica del conservadurismo religioso en la contienda política y cultural. Rio de Janeiro: ABIA.Google Scholar
Rodrigues Gomide, Andressa. 2020. Corpus Linguistics software: Understanding their Usages and Delivering Two New Tools. PhD thesis, Lancaster University. DOI logo
Sauntson, Helen, and Rodrigo Borba. 2021. “Silence and Sexuality in School Settings: A Transnational Perspective.” In The Handbook of Solitude, Silence and Loneliness, ed. by Julien Stern, Malgorzata Walejko, Christopher Sink, and Wong Ho, 174–188. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Souza, Juliana, Carla Cerqueira, Nelson Souza, and Daniela Drummond. 2020. “‘Gender Ideology’ in Journalistic Coverage in Brazil and Portugal: Comparing Discursive Political Disputes.” In Gender Performativities in Democracy under Threat, ed. by Maria Manuel Baptista, and Alexandre Almeida, 137–148. Coimbra: Grácio.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass, and Adrian Vermeule. 2009. “Symposium on Conspiracy Theories. Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (2): 202–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tribble, Christopher. 2010. “What are Concordances and How Are They Used?” In Routledge Handbooks in Applied Linguistics, ed. by Anne O’Keefe, and Michael McCarthy, 167183. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Trujillo, Alfonso López (ed.). 2007. “Lexicon: Ambiguous and Debatable Terms regarding Family Life and Ethical Questions.” In Pontifical Council for the Family (ed), xiii–xxii. Front Royal, VA: Human Life International.Google Scholar
Viteri, Maria Amelia. 2020. Ecuador – la instrumentalización de la “ideología de género”. Rio de Janeiro: ABIA.Google Scholar
Zottola, Angela. 2021. Transgender Identities in the Press. A Corpus-based Discourse Analysis. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Jones, Lucy
2023. Language, gender and sexuality in 2022. Gender and Language 17:2 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Bogetić, Ksenija
2022. Politics of resignification. Gender and Language 16:3 ► pp. 195 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.